news Canadian News
Good Afternoon Guest | login or register
  • Home
    • Canadian News
    • Popular News
    • News Voting Log
    • News Images
  • Forums
    • Recent Topics Scroll
    •  
    • Politics Forums
    • Sports Forums
    • Regional Forums
  • Content
    • Achievements
    • Canadian Content
    • Famous Canadians
    • Famous Quotes
    • Jokes
    • Canadian Maps
  • Photos
    • Picture Gallery
    • Wallpapers
    • Recent Activity
  • About
    • About
    • Contact
    • Link to Us
    • Points
    • Statistics
  • Shop
  • Register
    • Gold Membership
  • Archive
    • Canadian TV
    • Canadian Webcams
    • Groups
    • Links
    • Top 10's
    • Reviews
    • CKA Radio
    • Video
    • Weather

Man who stabbed police dog had rights breached

Canadian Content
20662news upnews down
Link Related to Canada in some say

Man who stabbed police dog had rights breached


Law & Order | 206619 hits | Mar 25 9:37 pm | Posted by: Hyack
10 Comment

A judge has stayed two charges against an Edmonton man who stabbed a police dog, ruling that police breached his charter rights even though the Crown had proven in both his guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

Comments

  1. by avatar mikewood86
    Fri Mar 26, 2010 5:02 am
    Aren't police dogs considered equal to that of a police officer? I'm just curious if he had stabbed an actual police officer what the judge would be saying.

    Should have been a head shot and we wouldn't have to deal with this doucher.

  2. by avatar Yogi
    Fri Mar 26, 2010 5:39 am
    "mikewood86" said
    Aren't police dogs considered equal to that of a police officer? I'm just curious if he had stabbed an actual police officer what the judge would be saying.

    Should have been a head shot and we wouldn't have to deal with this doucher.


    That's good for +1 R=UP

  3. by avatar PublicAnimalNo9
    Fri Mar 26, 2010 10:41 am
    Where the FUCK do they get these asshat judges from?????????

  4. by avatar GreenTiger
    Fri Mar 26, 2010 12:48 pm
    This judge is a confirmed thug hugger.

    I'm amazed to begin with that the officer allowed this thug to keep on breathing after stabbing the dog. The officer fired 7 times it should have been 8 and he should have been taken to autopsy not to the hospital. Now this thug will go free get millions in compensation and move to Miami Beach or Hawaii.

    I imagine if this judge or a member of his family were to be the victim of violence he would have an "epiphany".

  5. by avatar Heavy_Metal
    Fri Mar 26, 2010 12:58 pm
    "mikewood86" said
    Aren't police dogs considered equal to that of a police officer? I'm just curious if he had stabbed an actual police officer what the judge would be saying.

    Should have been a head shot and we wouldn't have to deal with this doucher.


    'tis what i though as well, but it is not so, the dog is not considered equal in the eyes of the law. There is also case law stating that a person can attach and hit the dog and get off if that person believes that the dog may kill them.

    but that doesn't mean that person can stab the dog.

    but wtf is this judge on, yeah ok judge by police dog is getting stabbed, i'll just run in there and get shanked myself so that i don't hurt this mans civil rights.

    I mirror the statement WHERE THE F*CK DO WE GET THESE JUDGES?!?!?!?!!?

  6. by avatar Brenda
    Fri Mar 26, 2010 1:28 pm
    7 bullets... What a waste... One should have been enough. Where the fuck do we train those officers? ;-)

  7. by avatar Newsbot
    Fri Mar 26, 2010 8:43 pm
    Man shot by cops released on Charter breaches
    Law & Order
    Posted By:
    2010-03-26 13:40:21

  8. by avatar uwish
    Fri Mar 26, 2010 8:43 pm
    I would say so. If that was you or me who shot at a fleeing suspect who commited a crime against me, we would be in jail!

  9. by avatar putz
    Fri Mar 26, 2010 8:44 pm
    I just don't get our justice system anymore..... I could understand if he was shot in the back running away but come on! 20ft or less is not a long distance. Everyone thinks knife versus gun, but, you can close that distance very fast.

  10. by avatar uwish
    Fri Mar 26, 2010 8:48 pm
    I will also say this. Likely the reason judges are so 'all over the place' with these kinds of decisions is because it is up to the judge to determine what is excessive force. We really need to re-define or 'better' define reasonable force, what is reasonable for some is not for others, it is simply to subjective.

    I am not saying it would be easy to do this, but from the wide range of rulings we see for somewhat similar circumstances, I think it is high time this is seriously looked at.

    as a side note, someone please explain to me how 'running and gunning' in this case is any different to the jeweller in BC who fired about as many times and killed that thug who threatened his wife with a gun? I sure remember all the armchair QB's coming out of the woodwork lambasting this guy for defending his and his wifes life saying how he shouldn't fire indiscriminately. Hum, good thing only police have guns right??? :roll:



view comments in forum
Page 1

You need to be a member of CKA and be logged into the site, to comment on news.

  • Login
  • Register (free)
 Share  Digg It Bookmark to del.icio.us Share on Facebook


Share on Facebook Submit page to Reddit
CKA About |  Legal |  Advertise |  Sitemap |  Contact   canadian mobile newsMobile

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2025 by Canadaka.net