Canadian Editorials Home | Archive | Topics Submit Article

Earthquake Chalk River Nuclear Reactor

Posted on Thursday, January 17 at 14:54 by philowl

Contributed By


Article Rating

 (0 votes) 


We should be in the streets shouting with clenched fist to get the government to move the reactor away from Chalk River. It sits in a active earthquake zone. On Dec. 20, 2007, a 3.0-magnitude tremor, centred 13 kilometres east of Pembroke, was felt. Two days later, a 3.6-magnitude quake struck 22 kilometres northeast of Deep River. McGee, vice-president of AECL, also reassured the CNSC that the upgraded pumps at the reactor can withstand tremors of up to a magnitude of 6 on the Richter scale. "A magnitude of 6!" The area has had a magnitude of 6.2 already! The following is from the US Geological Survey: Timiskaming, Quebec, Canada 1935 November 1 UTC Magnitude 6.2 Heavy damage occurred in the Timiskaming area, Canada. In the United States, chimneys and plaster sustained minor damage at Cortland, New York, about 50 kilometers south of Syracuse. Felt in eastern Maine, south to Washington, D.C., and west to Wisconsin, including 17 States and three Canadian Provinces. Timiskaming is "just north" of Chalk River. To make the situation more dangerous, now, at this moment, earthquakes are increasing in frequency and magnitude, this is related directly to the meltdown of the polar caps. The southern continent, Antartica, contains enough ice to raise ocean levels by about 60 metres, a deluge that would put every major coastal city in the world deep under water and uproot hundreds of millions of people. Also, most alarming of all, with the melting of the poles and the redistribution of water, the earth's crust is absorbing the weight and cracking under the load. Up to 2001, the number of "significant earthquakes" was 5 per year; since then it averages over 50 per year! See:

You need to be a member and be logged into the site, to comment on stories.

Latest Topics in Canadian Forums