'British sniper investigated for not shouting warning in Iraq'Military | 207162 hits | Jan 20 12:48 am | Posted by: N_Fiddledog Commentsview comments in forum Page 1 2 You need to be a member of CKA and be logged into the site, to comment on news. |
|
What complete and utter BULLSHIT.....1,200 metres.....had he been issued a megaphone, as his voice surely would not have been heard at that distance......
Another case of bullshit inquiries and lawsuits being filed by the ambulance chasers....
What complete and utter BULLSHIT.....1,200 metres.....had he been issued a megaphone, as his voice surely would not have been heard at that distance......
Another case of bullshit inquiries and lawsuits being filed by the ambulance chasers....
And funded by the UK taxpayer.
I wonder when our commissions will start.
Trudeau and company will probably set something up like this for Afghanistan.
Huh? Harper and his company already did.
Do we really have that much guilt because of our superior tactics and training that we have to now give away those advantages in the name of political correctness? A guy hides among civilians and kills soldiers from afar, and allied soldiers must give a verbal warning before letting him know his actions are not viewed as friendly? Fuck that. A bullet in the face is all that's needed, and publicly, as a warning to the others.
Insanity.
What was the motto of the Canadian Airborne Sniper corp? "Without warning, Sans Remorse."?
Trudeau and company will probably set something up like this for Afghanistan.
Huh? Harper and his company already did.
Care to provide any proof, or is this just more anti-Harper bullshit from the economist.
Oh wait it's the Brits, it'd be more like, "Pardon me my good chap, but it appears you're being rather uncivilized and if you don't stop, I shall be forced to write the UN a strong letter of consternation."
Disclaimer: Not making fun of the soldiers, just the idiot ROE they now have to put up with.
Care to provide any proof, or is this just more anti-Harper bullshit from the economist.
"More anti-Harper bullshit"? When have I ever posted any anti-Harper bullshit in the past for this to be more of it?
You posted what I believe was a moronic, partisan, completely untrue, unfounded speculation against Trudeau. Once you've proven your outlandish claim, I'll support my reply to it.
Care to provide any proof, or is this just more anti-Harper bullshit from the economist.
"More anti-Harper bullshit"? When have I ever posted any anti-Harper bullshit in the past for this to be more of it?
You posted what I believe was a moronic, partisan, completely untrue, unfounded speculation against Trudeau. Once you've proven your outlandish claim, I'll support my reply to it.
So nothing, just what I thought.
It's the same idiocy that prosecutes Canadian soldiers for mercy killings of an enemy so the enemy soldier doesn't have to die slowly of sepsis.
Do we really have that much guilt because of our superior tactics and training that we have to now give away those advantages in the name of political correctness? A guy hides among civilians and kills soldiers from afar, and allied soldiers must give a verbal warning before letting him know his actions are not viewed as friendly? Fuck that. A bullet in the face is all that's needed, and publicly, as a warning to the others.
Insanity.
What was the motto of the Canadian Airborne Sniper corp? "Without warning, Sans Remorse."?
Actually that case seemed to have a lot of support for prosecution from CKA members. I forget what the verdict was. They probably should have prosecuted, but then found the officer not guilty.