Kenyans dress non-Muslims in Islamic garb to save lives in al-Shabab attack

Another bullshit story? We know all Muslims are in league with the terrorists and hate the Christians, so why would they help out these ones?

They must need the 'infidel' tax income.

They must need the 'infidel' tax income.

I know this is sarcasm, but since Kenya is 83% Christian, I doubt they have that tax. Guess they treat their Muslims well enough that they're willing to help the kafirs, instead of the demonizing of Muslims we see in places that just drives the Muslims into the arms of the jihadis.

The article must be a hoax. All we're ever told is that Muslims exist only to kill non Muslims and destroy civilisation.

I'm quite surprised the Somalis didn't kill everyone on the bus. And btw the Kenyan Muslims have no qualms about killing Somali Muslims. The skinnies are not well loved in Kenya.

I love the way there's a special kind of reasoning skill that can allow those using it to say "Some means all," while they're mocking others with the false accusation they're saying "Some means all."

I call it prog logic. I've also heard it called magic-think or fantasy-think where a thing becomes true if you want to believe it, and it doesn't matter if it makes sense.

The way we see it displayed here is, "All critics of Mohammed's twisted ideology, now believe that none of his followers are ever capable basic humanity."

In this case of the terrorists attacking the bus there are followers who are willing to kill based on what they believe are commands from the death cult manual called the Koran, but there are other followers who would appear to defy the same teachings. How is that possible?

I could explain it, of course, but rational explanation doesn't work with the Regressive-Progressive. There appears to be some sort of mental block associated with the disorder.

Instead I'll point out that by stressing only the significance of the humanity of the bus passengers while ignoring the barbarism of the gunmen, they have again suggested "some means all" with the passengers now becoming the some that means alls.

What we see is a symptom of a mental disorder. I wish there was a "some does not mean all" pill for it, but there isn't.

Yeah. Cause all of the haters here have proved over and over again that they distinguish between good and bad Muslims.

Now as to the 'Jizya' or the "Kufar tax" commanded by Mohammed - the believers were commanded to subjugate the unbeliever until they "feel themselves subdued". It went convert, tax, or die. The tax is not noticeable today for the most part. A nation that wanted to deal with other nations would have a hard time making that one fly in the current climate.

Historically it's there. I believe the name "Jizya" might be Ottoman Turkish, but the practice goes back to the command of Mohammed. Currently one hears stories about incidents in places like Pakistan and Palestine, and apparently the Islamic State will use it at least on occasion, but most places are safe from it for now.

What you're really saying is "" critics means "" haters in all cases.

Again it's nothing more than "some means all."

You really can't help yourself, can you?

Just for the fun of it though, and because explaining things helps me clarify and also exposes flaws for correction (which believe it or not I like) I'm going to explain to you why some does not mean all here.

Now it is true there are commands in the Koran like 5:51 ~ O ye who believe! Take not the Jews and the Christians for your friends and protectors; they are but friends and protectors to each other. And he amongst you that turns to them (for friendship) is of them. Verily Allah guideth not a people unjust ~

But the self-reforming Muslim can present conflicting verses such as Koran 60:8 ~ Allah forbids you not, With regard to those who Fight you not for (your) Faith Nor drive you out Of your homes, From dealing kindly and justly With them: For Allah loveth Those who are just. ~

The self reforming Muslim might also point to things like context and translation as to why his is the superior interpretation (although he ignores when such things suggest the opposite. )

Some Muslims are like some Christians. They aren't that concerned with what's in the book. They prefer to just get along.

Also things like history, culture, current political climate, or geography can create a warmer interpretation for the greasier commands of the ideology.

So yeah, some are like this:



or this:



but not all. Some are bad Mohammedans, but good people.

I've made clear that there are Muslims whom I unconditionally .

That would be these good people: http://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/7009/ ... m-movement

The irony of your comment is found in how many liberals hate or ignore the Muslims like the people from MRM who speak out against an unreformed Islam which they find is at odds with Western civilization.

Hmmmmm..... who was it that said the only good muslim is a dead one.

Probably anyone who's been unfortunate enough to recently encounter Muslims in their raw and uncensored true-self mode?

Kenya has changed in the past few years.