news Canadian News
Good Morning Guest | login or register
  • Home
    • Canadian News
    • Popular News
    • News Voting Log
    • News Images
  • Forums
    • Recent Topics Scroll
    •  
    • Politics Forums
    • Sports Forums
    • Regional Forums
  • Content
    • Achievements
    • Canadian Content
    • Famous Canadians
    • Famous Quotes
    • Jokes
    • Canadian Maps
  • Photos
    • Picture Gallery
    • Wallpapers
    • Recent Activity
  • About
    • About
    • Contact
    • Link to Us
    • Points
    • Statistics
  • Shop
  • Register
    • Gold Membership
  • Archive
    • Canadian TV
    • Canadian Webcams
    • Groups
    • Links
    • Top 10's
    • Reviews
    • CKA Radio
    • Video
    • Weather

DND responds after documents suggest Navy procu

Canadian Content
20695news upnews down
Link Related to Canada in some say

DND responds after documents suggest Navy procurement troubles


Military | 206953 hits | Sep 22 6:20 pm | Posted by: Hyack
6 Comment

The defence department and armed forces have responded with a joint statement after CTV reported on issues facing the Royal Canadian Navy�s multi-billion dollar procurement.

Comments

  1. by Canadian_Mind
    Wed Sep 23, 2015 3:30 am
    When a government say's $26 billion, did they account for inflation (that $26 billion today will be $52 billion 30 years from now)? If so, this should be a non-story. If not, fucking idiots.

  2. by avatar bootlegga
    Thu Sep 24, 2015 5:04 am
    "Canadian_Mind" said
    When a government say's $26 billion, did they account for inflation (that $26 billion today will be $52 billion 30 years from now)? If so, this should be a non-story. If not, fucking idiots.


    You'd think so, but no.

    Inflation is the reason the Navy is getting two AORs instead of three (but at the original price three would have cost).

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Queenston ... ary_vessel

  3. by avatar Jabberwalker
    Thu Sep 24, 2015 10:03 am
    Are those AORs really on the way or are they going to just keep leasing from whomever?

  4. by Nuggie77
    Thu Sep 24, 2015 5:03 pm
    "bootlegga" said
    When a government say's $26 billion, did they account for inflation (that $26 billion today will be $52 billion 30 years from now)? If so, this should be a non-story. If not, fucking idiots.


    You'd think so, but no.

    Inflation is the reason the Navy is getting two AORs instead of three (but at the original price three would have cost).

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Queenston ... ary_vessel

    Actually, under the NSPS program, only two AOR's were contracted. The earlier JSS program which was shelved, called for three vessels that no company in the world could have build for the price we wanted to pay.
    In fact the programs were two different types of vessels. The JSS was to be able to support a Battle Group ashore, but the Army wouldn't cough up the funds from their budget, so the navy went with strictly an AOR to meet their purposes.

  5. by Nuggie77
    Thu Sep 24, 2015 5:04 pm
    "Jabberwalker" said
    Are those AORs really on the way or are they going to just keep leasing from whomever?


    Yes they will commence construction after the Fisheries vessels are built.

  6. by avatar Jabberwalker
    Thu Sep 24, 2015 10:25 pm
    "Nuggie77" said
    Are those AORs really on the way or are they going to just keep leasing from whomever?


    Yes they will commence construction after the Fisheries vessels are built.


    HMCS Bicentennial?



view comments in forum
Page 1

You need to be a member of CKA and be logged into the site, to comment on news.

  • Login
  • Register (free)
 Share  Digg It Bookmark to del.icio.us Share on Facebook


Share on Facebook Submit page to Reddit
CKA About |  Legal |  Advertise |  Sitemap |  Contact   canadian mobile newsMobile

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2025 by Canadaka.net