Lena Dunham hits back at �disgusting� accusation she molested her younger sister

She was 7 years old when these things happened, I think that should be considered. Not just that, but there wasn't any Sex involved.

A one year old child can put pebbles in her vagina?
Is that physically even possible?

She should apologize far more for her vapid, irrelevant, and disgusting HBO show than for anything she did as a little kid.

I think you need to read the article from Truth Revolt as well. They quote from Dunham's book.

They were kids. God, seriously Fiddle, you are so tight-assed you couldn't get a pin up your ass with a jackhammer.

A lot of kids sleep in the same bed for years. It used to be pretty common to only have one bedroom for ALL family members, including mom and dad. Babies were still born and made with kids sleeping in the room.

Can we please STOP seeing every sexual action as sexual harassment or abuse?

This book is on the best seller list? Why?

Is the world full of perverts? maybe that's who's buying this crap.

So? What was reported wasn't wrong, it wasn't made up, it wasn't even slanted. It was just saying what she had already said in her book.

It's sexual assault and that's a crime. Sure we can temper our view given the age of the attacker. As an adult she's still telling people this, writing it in her book we should also think less of her for it.

I don't know who she is, or really care; But it baffles the mind to include this sort of thing in a book you are writing about yourself and then get upset when people react in an expected manner to it.

The issue here is Dunham is threatening to sue Truth Revolt for directly quoting stuff like Dunham bragging about such things as doing "anything a sexual predator might do to woo a small suburban girl". She tells us in her quotes she was still tricking her little sister into her bed when she was 17.

It probably sounded pretty cool in her Proggy Pea brain when she first wrote it down in her 28 year old memoirs, but directly quote her words back to her and even she can see how this does not make her the definition of cool, as she first thought it did, so she threatens to sue.

BTW Dunham's family is rich. She grew up in multi-room houses. There was no having to stuff poor Lena and her little sister into the same bed.

Her parents are both artists. Here's a link to a sample of what made Daddy rich.

http://www.artnews.org/files/0000054000 ... Dunham.jpg

So you see molesting your little sister might seem cool to a rich progressive kid, but when right wing media quotes her boasting confessions back at her, she doesn't like it. She threatens to sue. Why is that, I wonder? Not as cool as she thought maybe?

Nope. There needs to be criminal intent for there to be a crime. Not to mention that children under 12 cannot commit crimes.

You are so far gone past retarded that we need a new adjective.

But Lena tells us she was still tricking her little sister with her "sticky, muscly little body" into her bed when she (Lena) was 17. Perhaps nothing illegal happened. Perhaps she was no longer bribing her little sister to "just relax on her". Doesn't matter.

Don't threaten to sue people for quoting your sordid tale. It's not the relayer of the message's fault you don't come off as the free minded champion of free thinking you thought you were.

And perhaps after you guys get finished defending the Sister molister, you can tell us again how Polanski wasn't rape rape, and Ghomeshi was just a case of consenting adults, and Mohammad raping a 9 year old was OK cause everybody did that back then.

Then tell us again about this Conservative "war on women" and their "rape culture".

And @ Lemmy. You're losing again. Stop being such a whimpering, insulting baby about it. If insults are all you've got, then you've got nothing. But on second thought, go ahead if you think it makes you a big shot. I'll play.

Not losing...lost. I've lost. There's no saving you.

Not losing...lost. I've lost. There's no saving you.

Of course you lost. You always lose the argument You have no defense against reasonable supported argument and must always slink back to your dark little corner to call somebody a poopy head.

Saving me? From what? From making you my bitch again?