news Canadian News
Good Afternoon Guest | login or register
  • Home
    • Canadian News
    • Popular News
    • News Voting Log
    • News Images
  • Forums
    • Recent Topics Scroll
    •  
    • Politics Forums
    • Sports Forums
    • Regional Forums
  • Content
    • Achievements
    • Canadian Content
    • Famous Canadians
    • Famous Quotes
    • Jokes
    • Canadian Maps
  • Photos
    • Picture Gallery
    • Wallpapers
    • Recent Activity
  • About
    • About
    • Contact
    • Link to Us
    • Points
    • Statistics
  • Shop
  • Register
    • Gold Membership
  • Archive
    • Canadian TV
    • Canadian Webcams
    • Groups
    • Links
    • Top 10's
    • Reviews
    • CKA Radio
    • Video
    • Weather

Obama EPA Issues Coal-Killing Rules To Cut Carb

Canadian Content
20669news upnews down

Obama EPA Issues Coal-Killing Rules To Cut Carbon Emissions 30 Percent


Business | 206680 hits | Jun 03 11:07 am | Posted by: N_Fiddledog
9 Comment

Today the Environmental Protection Agency released a long-anticipated rule proposal that seeks by 2030 to reduce America�s carbon dioxide emissions 30% from 2005 levels.

Comments

  1. by avatar N_Fiddledog
    Tue Jun 03, 2014 10:24 pm
    Here's another view on this one.

    "Having failed to get the Democrats? cap-and-trade scheme through Congress, President Obama intends to create it through fiat, with the Environmental Protection Agency scheduled to issue today what amounts to a bill of attainder against coal-fired electricity generators. The regulation will set a national limit on greenhouse-gas emissions from coal plants and then offer states a phony menu of choices for meeting that standard, stacking the policy deck in such a way as to force them into cap-and-trade programs administered by multistate cartels.

    It is far from obvious that the Obama administration has anything like the legal authority for this; until quite recently, the White House seemed to think that it was necessary for Congress ? remember Congress, the lawmaking branch of government? ? to pass a law creating a cap-and-trade program, but, having lost that vote, President Obama is pressing on in rule-by-decree mode, apparently having mistaken himself for Charles de Gaulle..."

    http://www.nationalreview.com/article/3 ... re-editors

  2. by avatar BartSimpson  Gold Member
    Tue Jun 03, 2014 10:31 pm
    The Dictator in Chief does it again.

  3. by avatar xerxes
    Tue Jun 03, 2014 10:37 pm
    How can Obama do this without Congress? He'll be working through the Environmental Protection Agency, which already has the legal authority to regulate US greenhouse gases.

    Since 2009, the EPA has used that authority to ratchet up fuel-economy standards for cars and light trucks. Then, last year, the agency imposed strict carbon standards on anyone who wants to build a new coal or gas plant in the future.

    Now the agency is going even further. The EPA's newest proposal will require the nation's power plants to cut their carbon-dioxide emissions 25 percent in the 2020s and 30 percent by 2030 � compared to 2005 levels.



  4. by Thanos
    Tue Jun 03, 2014 10:47 pm
    The Congress only wants to discuss things it's guaranteed to defeat in time for the next election cycle. :roll:

  5. by avatar N_Fiddledog
    Tue Jun 03, 2014 11:20 pm
    The campaign promise Obama kept.


  6. by avatar Jabberwalker
    Tue Jun 03, 2014 11:31 pm
    So much for electing Democrats in Appalachia.

    Actually, it's hard to get it right. Go after coal ... lose Appalachia. Go after frakking, lose the West. Go after oil, lose the Gulf states. Go after nuclear, lose the Northeast ... etc. ... etc.

    Fractious bunch of nutters, eh?

  7. by avatar andyt
    Tue Jun 03, 2014 11:52 pm
    I like what the woman from the EPA said: they predicted the death of the automobile industry when we brought in pollution controls on cars, now we have more cars than ever. They predicted the end of electric power when we took on sulphur emissions, now we have no acid rain and still have electricity. It's always the same crowd, same as the ones that cry doom for a minimum wage increase, and still this same crowd manages to earn more money than 90% of population put together.

  8. by avatar BartSimpson  Gold Member
    Tue Jun 03, 2014 11:59 pm
    "andyt" said
    I like what the woman from the EPA said: they predicted the death of the automobile industry when we brought in pollution controls on cars, now we have more cars than ever. They predicted the end of electric power when we took on sulphur emissions, now we have no acid rain and still have electricity. It's always the same crowd, same as the ones that cry doom for a minimum wage increase, and still this same crowd manages to earn more money than 90% of population put together.


    And sh*theads like you don't see the link between ever-increasing energy costs, higher production costs, and the obviating of your pathetic, limp-d***ed minimum wage. :roll:

  9. by avatar Xort
    Wed Jun 04, 2014 12:43 pm
    The only real solution is more nuclear power. I guess the 6 current plants projected to come online in the next 15 years is a start.



view comments in forum
Page 1

You need to be a member of CKA and be logged into the site, to comment on news.

  • Login
  • Register (free)
 Share  Digg It Bookmark to del.icio.us Share on Facebook


Who voted on this?

  • Goober911 Tue Jun 03, 2014 10:32 am
Share on Facebook Submit page to Reddit
CKA About |  Legal |  Advertise |  Sitemap |  Contact   canadian mobile newsMobile

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2025 by Canadaka.net