news Canadian News
Good Afternoon Guest | login or register
  • Home
    • Canadian News
    • Popular News
    • News Voting Log
    • News Images
  • Forums
    • Recent Topics Scroll
    •  
    • Politics Forums
    • Sports Forums
    • Regional Forums
  • Content
    • Achievements
    • Canadian Content
    • Famous Canadians
    • Famous Quotes
    • Jokes
    • Canadian Maps
  • Photos
    • Picture Gallery
    • Wallpapers
    • Recent Activity
  • About
    • About
    • Contact
    • Link to Us
    • Points
    • Statistics
  • Shop
  • Register
    • Gold Membership
  • Archive
    • Canadian TV
    • Canadian Webcams
    • Groups
    • Links
    • Top 10's
    • Reviews
    • CKA Radio
    • Video
    • Weather

Teen's Facebook brag costs dad $80,000

Canadian Content
20718news upnews down
Link Related to Canada in some say

Teen's Facebook brag costs dad $80,000


Strange | 207178 hits | Mar 02 1:50 pm | Posted by: Curtman
12 Comment

When Dana Snay learned her father had been awarded a settlement in an age-discrimination lawsuit, she couldn't resist bragging about it on Facebook. A judge ruled her boast may have cost the entire award.

Comments

  1. by Anonymous
    Sun Mar 02, 2014 9:58 pm
    "Mama and Papa Snay won the case against Gulliver," the teen posted to her 1,200 Facebook friends. "Gulliver is now officially paying for my vacation to Europe this summer. SUCK IT."

    It was a bit of boasting that could end up costing the Snays the entire $80,000 (?47,750) settlement, reports the Miami Herald.

    When Gulliver got wind of post, which didn't take long, as Dana was a former student, the school refused to pay a dime because the father had signed a confidentiality agreement - and on Wednesday a Florida appeals court found in its favour.

    The story has writers drawing conclusions about the foolishness of today's youth and the perils of social media.

    Elie Mystal on the blog Above the Law calls it "a new low for the Millennial generation".


    Wow. No Internet for her anymore.

  2. by avatar ShepherdsDog
    Sun Mar 02, 2014 10:29 pm
    confidential means tell no one....not your wife nor your kids.

  3. by avatar Brenda
    Sun Mar 02, 2014 10:38 pm
    "ShepherdsDog" said
    confidential means tell no one....not your wife nor your kids.

    When it comes to the actual work you do, I can see that point. You're not to discuss patients records.
    But when it comes to a lawsuit, how can you keep that from your family? You shouldn't have to, since it concerns them all. Especially since he lost his job (or so I assume), which directly hurts your whole family.

    Also, HE was not the one breaching the confidentiality contract...

  4. by avatar ShepherdsDog
    Sun Mar 02, 2014 11:04 pm
    the details were not to be shared...they could have the settlement but they weren`t to go out discussing the details. Saying `we received money from a settlement`, and having knowing full well where it came from without discussion. is different than screaming to the world we were given money by so and so, suck it (insert name).

    If the child is a minor and they can prove he didn`t spill the beans to her, they likely have a case.....if he blathered he`s screwed by stupidity.

  5. by avatar ccga3359
    Sun Mar 02, 2014 11:08 pm
    Confidentiality might mean the amount of the award not win or lose. Therefore the father may not need to have told his family the amount awarded only that it is over and the family can get on with their lives.

  6. by avatar Brenda
    Sun Mar 02, 2014 11:10 pm
    Oh, the kid definitely should have shut up, no doubt about it!!

  7. by avatar Strutz
    Mon Mar 03, 2014 12:18 am
    Wow. Yet another example of how social media can be harmful.

  8. by Prof_Chomsky
    Mon Mar 03, 2014 5:07 pm
    I feel bad for this guy and hope it's over turned. She's family and SHE didn't sign the agreement, her dad did. Hopefully she's under 18 and that wins the day.

    Anyone with kids knows that kids BLAB. All it would take is her overhearing a conversation between her parents (and spouses are always allowed to share information regardless of agreement, it's the marriage contract).

    Hypothetical situation. Let's say the parents are divorced and the husband HAS to disclose his deal due to support payments. Then the exwife tells her new boyfriend who blabs it. Is he at fault?

  9. by avatar BartSimpson  Gold Member
    Mon Mar 03, 2014 6:14 pm
    Meh. Some narcissitic millenial cost her parents $80,000 because she overshares. It won't teach her a thing.

  10. by avatar bootlegga
    Mon Mar 03, 2014 6:30 pm
    "ShepherdsDog" said
    confidential means tell no one....not your wife nor your kids.


    It's hard to tell from the article, but it's possible that his family was present in court for the lawsuit.

    But I agree that he certainly should have made sure anyone present were fully aware what the confidentiality agreement meant - ie. no telling your friends in the hallways, no posting on Facebook, etc.

  11. by Thanos
    Mon Mar 03, 2014 7:09 pm
    "BartSimpson" said
    Meh. Some narcissitic millenial cost her parents $80,000 because she overshares. It won't teach her a thing.


    LOL. Fuck you, Dad! :mrgreen:

  12. by avatar Benn
    Tue Mar 04, 2014 5:07 am
    So I guess that Euro vacation is now one to summer Camp I'm a Twit.

    Life lesson for the poor girl. Defendant gets the last laugh.



view comments in forum
Page 1

You need to be a member of CKA and be logged into the site, to comment on news.

  • Login
  • Register (free)
 Share  Digg It Bookmark to del.icio.us Share on Facebook


Share on Facebook Submit page to Reddit
CKA About |  Legal |  Advertise |  Sitemap |  Contact   canadian mobile newsMobile

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2025 by Canadaka.net