Why? Who claimed he was unbiased? Is that important? Are you unbiased? Very well convince me of the superiority of your opinion. His anti-Jihad opinion is supported with facts. Produce your facts. Convince me Jihad is a kittens and sunshine thing, and that is an unbiased opinion based on facts that somehow make the facts of the biased guy who opposes Jihad irrelevant.
Jeff seems to have walked out on his side of the discussion once we started asking for facts, so I'll help him out.
It's time for Jeff to say "yeah well, the crusades, and other religions have done nasty things, and all that".
To which I get to post another argument based on fact from another biased opinionator in response to the inevitable moral equivalency point from the "unbiased" left.
Jeff seems to have walked out on his side of the discussion once we started asking for facts, so I'll help him out.
It's time for Jeff to say "yeah well, the crusades, and other religions have done nasty things, and all that".
To which I get to post another argument based on fact from another biased opinionator in response to the inevitable moral equivalency point from the "unbiased" left.
Jeff has mentioned a couple times how he thinks Iran is an example of democracy.
"llama66" said We need to go after the Imams and the Caliphs, they are the problem.
What you mean the Imams who are sent to Canada by Saudi Arabia and Egypt, who are welcomed with open arms, but never questioned when Canadian kids start showing up in Algeria, Syria and other places ?
Can someone even remotely explain how attacking a Mall in Kenya and a College in Nigeria is a strike against the west and or promotes the faith of Islam?
At what time in the past or present has Nigeria and Kenya attacked a Muslim country?
Are Muslims around the world dancing in joy that these attacks have happened?
Not the same Jihadi attack, but the same motivation explained below.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Wood ... ologist%29
Not even a remotely neutral source, Fox news is more unbiased than that guy.
Jeff seems to have walked out on his side of the discussion once we started asking for facts, so I'll help him out.
It's time for Jeff to say "yeah well, the crusades, and other religions have done nasty things, and all that".
To which I get to post another argument based on fact from another biased opinionator in response to the inevitable moral equivalency point from the "unbiased" left.
Not the same Jihadi attack, but the same motivation explained below.
Not even a remotely neutral source, Fox news is more unbiased than that guy.
It doesn't matter what the source is, it's whether or not he's right.
Whose eyes? Jeff's or David's?
Jeff seems to have walked out on his side of the discussion once we started asking for facts, so I'll help him out.
It's time for Jeff to say "yeah well, the crusades, and other religions have done nasty things, and all that".
To which I get to post another argument based on fact from another biased opinionator in response to the inevitable moral equivalency point from the "unbiased" left.
Jeff has mentioned a couple times how he thinks Iran is an example of democracy.
We need to go after the Imams and the Caliphs, they are the problem.
What you mean the Imams who are sent to Canada by Saudi Arabia and Egypt, who are welcomed with open arms, but never questioned when Canadian kids start showing up in Algeria, Syria and other places ?
Naw, they're not doing anything wrong.
At what time in the past or present has Nigeria and Kenya attacked a Muslim country?
Are Muslims around the world dancing in joy that these attacks have happened?