news Canadian News
Good Evening Guest | login or register
  • Home
    • Canadian News
    • Popular News
    • News Voting Log
    • News Images
  • Forums
    • Recent Topics Scroll
    •  
    • Politics Forums
    • Sports Forums
    • Regional Forums
  • Content
    • Achievements
    • Canadian Content
    • Famous Canadians
    • Famous Quotes
    • Jokes
    • Canadian Maps
  • Photos
    • Picture Gallery
    • Wallpapers
    • Recent Activity
  • About
    • About
    • Contact
    • Link to Us
    • Points
    • Statistics
  • Shop
  • Register
    • Gold Membership
  • Archive
    • Canadian TV
    • Canadian Webcams
    • Groups
    • Links
    • Top 10's
    • Reviews
    • CKA Radio
    • Video
    • Weather

Transport Canada OKs oil tanker traffic in Kiti

Canadian Content
20776news upnews down
Link Related to Canada in some say

Transport Canada OKs oil tanker traffic in Kitimat


Misc CDN | 207757 hits | Feb 23 2:14 pm | Posted by: Strutz
10 Comment

Huge oil tankers can safely travel in and out of the port of Kitimat, B.C., says a Transport Canada review of Enbridge Inc.'s controversial Northern Gateway project.

Comments

  1. by sargentstadanko
    Fri Feb 24, 2012 2:17 am
    I"m all for shipping oil to Asia instead of the U.S. but for crying out loud put the terminal in Prince Rupert! Not 50 miles(or whatever it is) INLAND!!

  2. by avatar Gunnair  Gold Member
    Fri Feb 24, 2012 4:18 am
    Fuck you Transport Canada.

  3. by avatar Caelon
    Fri Feb 24, 2012 6:03 am
    I would like to see the economic arguement for choosing Kitimat over Prince Rupert. There has to be something in the pipeline route, port facilities, etc that is pushing Kitimat as the the preferred shipping point.

  4. by avatar PublicAnimalNo9
    Fri Feb 24, 2012 8:44 am
    "Caelon" said
    I would like to see the economic arguement for choosing Kitimat over Prince Rupert. There has to be something in the pipeline route, port facilities, etc that is pushing Kitimat as the the preferred shipping point.

    I would hope that the reason is sensible otherwise,
    "Gunnair" said
    Fuck you Transport Canada.

    what he said.

  5. by avatar Freakinoldguy
    Fri Feb 24, 2012 12:07 pm
    This definately gives the impression that any hearings or proposed meetings with stakeholders over the Enbridge Pipeline are just window dressing for a decision that's already been made.

    I wonder what this does to the Kinder Morgan plan to double the capacity of their Trans Mountain pipeline to Vancouver and eliminate the need for the Enbridge one?

  6. by avatar dino_bobba_renno
    Fri Feb 24, 2012 1:09 pm
    "Freakinoldguy" said


    I wonder what this does to the Kinder Morgan plan to double the capacity of their Trans Mountain pipeline to Vancouver and eliminate the need for the Enbridge one?


    Nope, they're competing lines. Kinder is planning on going to construction on 2 of the remaining 3 phases of the TMX next year or the year after. As for the final phase I would imagine it will happen right after.

  7. by avatar dino_bobba_renno
    Fri Feb 24, 2012 1:18 pm
    "Caelon" said
    I would like to see the economic arguement for choosing Kitimat over Prince Rupert. There has to be something in the pipeline route, port facilities, etc that is pushing Kitimat as the the preferred shipping point.


    I believe it's because they want to utilize Rupert of LNG and they probably feel they're will be too much traffic if they put both the LNG and oil terminals there.

  8. by avatar andyt
    Fri Feb 24, 2012 5:44 pm
    "Caelon" said
    I would like to see the economic arguement for choosing Kitimat over Prince Rupert. There has to be something in the pipeline route, port facilities, etc that is pushing Kitimat as the the preferred shipping point.


    It's way longer and thru much tougher terrain to PR. So it would cost Enbridge more, while offloading more risk onto the province because of greater likelihood of a spill in Kitimat.

    BTW, Enbridge's business case is based on the pipeline increasing oil costs by a bout $3/year for 30 years - ie a $90/barrel increase, so almost a doubling at current prices. Because the oil will be shipped to high demand Asia, it will raise prices in North America too.

  9. by avatar herbie
    Sat Feb 25, 2012 5:00 am
    It's $93 million more to go to Rupert instead according to their own figures.
    The fix is in. Who does Transport Canada work for? Now we now.
    This goes against everything BC'ers have said in the past.

    Yeah it will increase prices here. And not deliver ONE refinery job. A handful of jobs in Kitimat and the risk borne by all BC.

  10. by avatar PublicAnimalNo9
    Sat Feb 25, 2012 7:41 am
    Refinery jobs. That's what Canada needs. Seems kinda stupid to export "cheap" oil and import far more expensive gasoline. Not that I believe a refining industry in Canada would lower our gas prices by one tenth of a cent, but at least of that gasoline money would be staying here.



view comments in forum
Page 1

You need to be a member of CKA and be logged into the site, to comment on news.

  • Login
  • Register (free)
 Share  Digg It Bookmark to del.icio.us Share on Facebook


Share on Facebook Submit page to Reddit
CKA About |  Legal |  Advertise |  Sitemap |  Contact   canadian mobile newsMobile

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2025 by Canadaka.net