news Canadian News
Good Morning Guest | login or register
  • Home
    • Canadian News
    • Popular News
    • News Voting Log
    • News Images
  • Forums
    • Recent Topics Scroll
    •  
    • Politics Forums
    • Sports Forums
    • Regional Forums
  • Content
    • Achievements
    • Canadian Content
    • Famous Canadians
    • Famous Quotes
    • Jokes
    • Canadian Maps
  • Photos
    • Picture Gallery
    • Wallpapers
    • Recent Activity
  • About
    • About
    • Contact
    • Link to Us
    • Points
    • Statistics
  • Shop
  • Register
    • Gold Membership
  • Archive
    • Canadian TV
    • Canadian Webcams
    • Groups
    • Links
    • Top 10's
    • Reviews
    • CKA Radio
    • Video
    • Weather

Conservative MP Stephen Woodworth looks to reo

Canadian Content
20779news upnews down
Link Related to Canada in some say

Conservative MP Stephen Woodworth looks to reopen abortion debate using 'modern medically accurate evidence'


Political | 207792 hits | Dec 21 5:22 pm | Posted by: Gunnair
131 Comment

A Conservative MP is seeking to reopen Canada�s abortion debate, apparently against his government�s wishes, by asking Parliament to consider �21st century medical evidence� on when a fetus becomes a person under the law

Comments

  1. by avatar Gunnair  Gold Member
    Thu Dec 22, 2011 1:29 am
    I smell a demotion coming soon!

  2. by jeff744
    Thu Dec 22, 2011 1:35 am
    "Gunnair" said
    I smell a demotion coming soon!

    Won't matter, the second the debate is opened the cons will be related to it even if they get rid of the guy.

  3. by avatar ShepherdsDog
    Thu Dec 22, 2011 1:48 am
    Can't muzzle free speech, but you don't have to open a debate on the issue. he can jabber all he wants as an MP. it's not party policy. There were 12 Liberal MPs and senators who tried to introduce anti abortion legislation as well.

    http://www.arcc-cdac.ca/presentations/anti-bills.html

    It's a pretty divisive issue and as the link I posted points out, the last government sponsored bill was narrowly defeated in the senate. Pro choice doesn't mean you are pro abortion it just means you support the ability to choose that option. Many who are pro choice would never make abortion their choice, like my wife and myself. However, we don't have the right to deny others their right to choose, whether we disagree with it or not.

  4. by Lemmy
    Thu Dec 22, 2011 1:59 am
    We have 21st century problems to deal with. Why in the fuck are we talking about an issue that was decided last century? :roll:

  5. by avatar ShepherdsDog
    Thu Dec 22, 2011 2:01 am
    The problems of the 21st century are still the same as those that have plagued us in the earlier centuries. Nothing too new has really come up in these past 11 years. As they say, the more things change, the more they stay the same.

  6. by Lemmy
    Thu Dec 22, 2011 2:10 am
    Abortion was a problem before it was settled 20+ years ago. It's a problem no more. Time to focus on problems that haven't been solved.

  7. by avatar Brenda
    Thu Dec 22, 2011 2:58 am
    Never close the discussion/conversation on anything. Ever.
    There is ALWAYS room for improvement on everything, even abortion.

  8. by Lemmy
    Thu Dec 22, 2011 3:02 am
    Improvement is not what some seek. Re-criminalization is.

  9. by avatar ShepherdsDog
    Thu Dec 22, 2011 3:03 am
    It's legal status was settled. However, so was the legal status of gay marriage and capital punishment, yet they remain highly controversial, and will likely remain so for a long time. Unfortunately, laws change over time, the events of 911 proved how 'entrenched' civil liberties were trumped by 'security'. hell the Americans claim they fought their revolution over the erosion of their traditional rights of/as Englishmen. You can't write off something like this with, 'we made a law 20 years ago', so case closed Sadly, the stone in which laws and rights are set in are soapstone, if not something lower on Mohs scale.

  10. by Lemmy
    Thu Dec 22, 2011 3:10 am
    All true and irrelevant to the prospects of sending teenaged girls back to the alleys.

  11. by avatar ShepherdsDog
    Thu Dec 22, 2011 3:25 am
    I envy and pity your optimism.

  12. by Lemmy
    Thu Dec 22, 2011 3:52 am
    I guess I just worry about my 6 year old daughter. I worry that religious nuts seek to take away her right to choice and freedom over her body.

  13. by avatar Gunnair  Gold Member
    Thu Dec 22, 2011 3:56 am
    "Lemmy" said
    I guess I just worry about my 6 year old daughter. I worry that religious nuts seek to take away her right to choice and freedom over her body.


    Honestly can't see it happening.

  14. by Lemmy
    Thu Dec 22, 2011 4:00 am
    Nor can I, honestly and thankfully. But why bring it up? There's no need to be a douchebag, Woodworth. Get out of the goddamn dark ages. Put the bible down and do your fucking job.



view comments in forum
Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

You need to be a member of CKA and be logged into the site, to comment on news.

  • Login
  • Register (free)
 Share  Digg It Bookmark to del.icio.us Share on Facebook


Share on Facebook Submit page to Reddit
CKA About |  Legal |  Advertise |  Sitemap |  Contact   canadian mobile newsMobile

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2025 by Canadaka.net