news Canadian News
Good Morning Guest | login or register
  • Home
    • Canadian News
    • Popular News
    • News Voting Log
    • News Images
  • Forums
    • Recent Topics Scroll
    •  
    • Politics Forums
    • Sports Forums
    • Regional Forums
  • Content
    • Achievements
    • Canadian Content
    • Famous Canadians
    • Famous Quotes
    • Jokes
    • Canadian Maps
  • Photos
    • Picture Gallery
    • Wallpapers
    • Recent Activity
  • About
    • About
    • Contact
    • Link to Us
    • Points
    • Statistics
  • Shop
  • Register
    • Gold Membership
  • Archive
    • Canadian TV
    • Canadian Webcams
    • Groups
    • Links
    • Top 10's
    • Reviews
    • CKA Radio
    • Video
    • Weather

Quebec's child-care scheme pays for itself, eco

Canadian Content
20803news upnews down
Link Related to Canada in some say

Quebec's child-care scheme pays for itself, economist


Business | 208029 hits | Jun 22 7:19 am | Posted by: DerbyX
4 Comment

Governments that say they can�t afford to invest in affordable child care are wrong, says a Montreal economist who is releasing a new analysis of Quebec�s popular $7-a-day program Wednesday.

Comments

  1. by avatar Robair
    Wed Jun 22, 2011 2:40 pm
    Good stuff. If we want to rely less on immigration, we need to make a more kid/family friendly country.

  2. by avatar CommanderSock
    Wed Jun 22, 2011 3:04 pm
    Does this mean we can hold back some of that $8 billion in transfer payments? Perhaps pay for services in our provinces.

  3. by avatar Proculation
    Wed Jun 22, 2011 3:12 pm
    Yeah, sure. That's why it's always in ever growing deficit. It's "paying itself" :lol:
    I hate those biased "report" that tries to pass as objective because the guy is an 'intellectual'.

  4. by avatar Proculation
    Wed Jun 22, 2011 3:22 pm
    What Fortin 'forgets' to take into account, is that while it's true it boosted the number of birth for some years, it's not a permanent process. It's just that that generation of women decided to have babies younger than before. They have babies at 25 instead of 30 yo. So the two 'generations' overlapped and by that effect, it boosted birth numbers. However, it doesn't mean they make MORE babies. They just had the same rate of babies before they would have without the program. That overlapping period where those two generations had babies at the same time is now over according to the recent birthrate.

    He plays with the numbers, like most 'economists' report to sustain an agenda.

    As an example, a report last week from another 'economist' said that Quebec was not a 'welfare state' of Canada at all and that, in fact, we were contributing MORE to Canada than what we receive. So, those reports have to be taken more as opinions than as facts.



view comments in forum
Page 1

You need to be a member of CKA and be logged into the site, to comment on news.

  • Login
  • Register (free)
 Share  Digg It Bookmark to del.icio.us Share on Facebook


Who voted on this?

  • martin14 Wed Jun 22, 2011 7:49 am
  • Prof_Chomsky Wed Jun 22, 2011 11:08 am
Share on Facebook Submit page to Reddit
CKA About |  Legal |  Advertise |  Sitemap |  Contact   canadian mobile newsMobile

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2025 by Canadaka.net