Link Related to Canada in some say

Judge's husband pleads guilty over naked photos


Law & Order | 207102 hits | Mar 28 8:13 am | Posted by: wildrosegirl
13 Comment

A Winnipeg lawyer has pleaded guilty to professional misconduct for pressuring a man to have sex with his wife, who later became a family court judge.

Comments

  1. by avatar GreenTiger
    Tue Mar 29, 2011 2:51 pm
    Sleez bag.

  2. by avatar Brenda
    Tue Mar 29, 2011 3:00 pm
    So, let me get this straight. A man (lawyer) has a client, whom he sends naked pictures of his wife, now judge. There are meetings where all 3 attend.

    3 consenting adults, what is the problem?

  3. by avatar PostFactum
    Tue Mar 29, 2011 3:04 pm
    "My behaviour was disgraceful,"
    Real lawyer will never say this :)

  4. by avatar andyt
    Tue Mar 29, 2011 4:05 pm
    "Brenda" said
    So, let me get this straight. A man (lawyer) has a client, whom he sends naked pictures of his wife, now judge. There are meetings where all 3 attend.

    3 consenting adults, what is the problem?


    Did you read this part?
    WINNIPEG � A Manitoba lawyer said he was sorry for pressuring a client eight years ago to have sex with the lawyer's wife, now a judge, as he pleaded guilty Monday to professional misconduct.

  5. by avatar Brenda
    Tue Mar 29, 2011 4:10 pm
    Yeah, I did. They never had sex, so it didn't work. Fail :P

  6. by avatar andyt
    Tue Mar 29, 2011 4:13 pm
    You don't think this is discreditable conduct for a lawyer?

  7. by avatar Brenda
    Tue Mar 29, 2011 4:25 pm
    He already paid $25k, and didn't practice for 10 months. Isn't that enough?

  8. by avatar andyt
    Tue Mar 29, 2011 4:34 pm
    He's suing to get the 25k back. He didn't practice because he was getting treatment. And the law society took that into account and so didn't suspend him but only reprimanded him. You think that's too much?

  9. by avatar Brenda
    Tue Mar 29, 2011 4:43 pm
    "andyt" said
    He's suing to get the 25k back. He didn't practice because he was getting treatment. And the law society took that into account and so didn't suspend him but only reprimanded him. You think that's too much?

    Of course he is suing to get it back when the deal is broken. Duhh.

    No, I think it is ok that he is reprimanded, since it went to the Society. They can not let this go. But it shouldn't have gone there, OR the deal shouldn't have been made. It is either, or, not and, and.
    The guy went along with going out on "dates". I think he is being hypocrite.

  10. by avatar andyt
    Tue Mar 29, 2011 4:46 pm
    The guy isn't a hypocrite. He's was trying to get a lot more money out of them, but his lawsuit was dismissed. He doesn't deserve any sympathy.

    But I'm glad the law society did hear about this case.

  11. by avatar GreenTiger
    Tue Mar 29, 2011 5:59 pm
    They guy is still a sleaze.

  12. by avatar Brenda
    Tue Mar 29, 2011 6:02 pm
    "GreenTiger" said
    They guy is still a sleaze.

    They both are. I don't know how much the woman was involved, other than that he sent pics of her without her knowing, and as his wife, so I will assume she wasn't knowingly involved. But both men were.

  13. by avatar andyt
    Tue Mar 29, 2011 6:05 pm
    "Brenda" said
    They guy is still a sleaze.

    They both are. I don't know how much the woman was involved, other than that he sent pics of her without her knowing, and as his wife, so I will assume she wasn't knowingly involved. But both men were.

    She did go to the meeting, so she was involved at some level. Supposedly just to make her husband happy. But, since she had no relationship with the 'victim' she didn't do anything wrong, tho she's still being investigated herself.



view comments in forum
You need to be a member of CKA and be logged into the site, to comment on news.

 Share  Digg It Bookmark to del.icio.us Share on Facebook


Share on Facebook Submit page to Reddit
CKA About |  Legal |  Advertise |  Sitemap |  Contact   canadian mobile newsMobile