news Canadian News
Good Afternoon Guest | login or register
  • Home
    • Canadian News
    • Popular News
    • News Voting Log
    • News Images
  • Forums
    • Recent Topics Scroll
    •  
    • Politics Forums
    • Sports Forums
    • Regional Forums
  • Content
    • Achievements
    • Canadian Content
    • Famous Canadians
    • Famous Quotes
    • Jokes
    • Canadian Maps
  • Photos
    • Picture Gallery
    • Wallpapers
    • Recent Activity
  • About
    • About
    • Contact
    • Link to Us
    • Points
    • Statistics
  • Shop
  • Register
    • Gold Membership
  • Archive
    • Canadian TV
    • Canadian Webcams
    • Groups
    • Links
    • Top 10's
    • Reviews
    • CKA Radio
    • Video
    • Weather

Chinese Embrace Nuclear Power, Master Uranium R

Canadian Content
20792news upnews down
Link Related to Canada in some say

Chinese Embrace Nuclear Power, Master Uranium Reprocessing


Environmental | 207919 hits | Jan 27 7:40 am | Posted by: can-aid-ian
10 Comment

The Chinese are getting off dirty coal and getting on clean nuclear energy to power their future.

Comments

  1. by avatar martin14
    Thu Jan 27, 2011 5:49 pm
    Good for them, hope they know how to build them.

  2. by avatar DrCaleb
    Thu Jan 27, 2011 8:39 pm
    "martin14" said
    Good for them, hope they know how to build them.


    Doesn't mater to me Martin. Coal pollution travels worldwide. Nuclear waste is a local hazard.

  3. by Khar
    Fri Jan 28, 2011 3:48 am
    I don't know, DrCaleb. I have no doubt that increases in investment of Nuclear Energy (which has been ongoing for some time) will lead to an increase in concerns about proliferation. There have also been cases of illegal dumping in the past, such as the 'Ndrangheta case, and there have been cases where nuclear accidents have had broad reaching impacts, like the Goi�nia accident. It's usually a local hazard, but not always, and when it's not local it's quite concerning.

    However, I would agree overall that nuclear waste and problems are far more local, and that I'd definitely prefer to see a switchover to more nuclear energy as time goes on. I've been less than impressed by some provinces moves towards Nuclear energy, however -- particularly in spots like Ontario, which seems to drag it's feet and end up paying a lot more for their nuclear projects than is preferable.

  4. by avatar martin14
    Fri Jan 28, 2011 7:09 am
    proliferation ? pffff, the Chinese have enough nuclear weapons and technology already.

    Increasing their civilian program won't make a difference.

  5. by avatar PostFactum
    Fri Jan 28, 2011 7:13 am
    "derived from Russian technology" it scares me

  6. by Khar
    Fri Jan 28, 2011 6:38 pm
    "martin14" said
    proliferation ? pffff, the Chinese have enough nuclear weapons and technology already.

    Increasing their civilian program won't make a difference.


    I disagree. An increase in availability of nuclear waste would likely be a concern to a lot of parties fighting nuclear proliferation. We already see people with problems due to the lackadaisical approach of the Soviets to protecting their nuclear assets, and China has not exactly been great when it comes .

    Concerns about a lack of security or internal corruption which is already present in China boosting proliferation to even more parties should at least be a concern. From those links above, we can see that the commercial aspect of nuclear power within China has been an issue for proliferation already, as far back as a decade and a half ago when it came to who they were selling commercial technologies to. An increase in the size of their domestic nuclear power base could increase that industry's leverage in China to expanding further, in contrast to non-domestic pressures to reduce such activities. Even though Chinese proliferation has been declining, and increase could occur if the civilian aspect gains a boost from sales and infrastructure, and they have played a role in the proliferation of weaponry in the past, alongside the military. It's not a fringe concern either.

    Just my opinion, though.

  7. by avatar GreenTiger
    Mon Jan 31, 2011 4:54 am
    Perhaps their reactor site will as safe as Chernobyl.

  8. by avatar GreenTiger
    Mon Jan 31, 2011 4:55 am
    Perhaps their reactor site will as safe as Chernobyl.

  9. by avatar GreenTiger
    Mon Jan 31, 2011 4:55 am
    Perhaps their reactor site will as safe as Chernobyl.

  10. by avatar PublicAnimalNo9
    Mon Jan 31, 2011 5:03 am
    3rd time's a charm eh? :wink: :lol:



view comments in forum
Page 1

You need to be a member of CKA and be logged into the site, to comment on news.

  • Login
  • Register (free)
 Share  Digg It Bookmark to del.icio.us Share on Facebook


Share on Facebook Submit page to Reddit
CKA About |  Legal |  Advertise |  Sitemap |  Contact   canadian mobile newsMobile

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2025 by Canadaka.net