news Canadian News
Good Evening Guest | login or register
  • Home
    • Canadian News
    • Popular News
    • News Voting Log
    • News Images
  • Forums
    • Recent Topics Scroll
    •  
    • Politics Forums
    • Sports Forums
    • Regional Forums
  • Content
    • Achievements
    • Canadian Content
    • Famous Canadians
    • Famous Quotes
    • Jokes
    • Canadian Maps
  • Photos
    • Picture Gallery
    • Wallpapers
    • Recent Activity
  • About
    • About
    • Contact
    • Link to Us
    • Points
    • Statistics
  • Shop
  • Register
    • Gold Membership
  • Archive
    • Canadian TV
    • Canadian Webcams
    • Groups
    • Links
    • Top 10's
    • Reviews
    • CKA Radio
    • Video
    • Weather

Parent support trial put on hold

Canadian Content
20694news upnews down
Link Related to Canada in some say

Parent support trial put on hold


Law & Order | 206943 hits | Aug 17 7:22 am | Posted by: QBall
7 Comment

The unusual B.C. Supreme Court hearing of Shirley Anderson, a 71-year-old woman who is suing her estranged children for support, was adjourned Tuesday after a Vancouver lawyer stepped in at the last minute to offer the siblings some pro bono help.

Comments

  1. by avatar Bacardi4206
    Tue Aug 17, 2010 8:07 pm
    $750 a month per child? Who has that kinda money. Also she has the balls to ask for it after she abandonded her kids at age 15? Shes definetly a top 10 worst parent.

  2. by avatar saturn_656
    Tue Aug 17, 2010 8:10 pm
    "Bacardi4206" said
    $750 a month per child? Who has that kinda money. Also she has the balls to ask for it after she abandonded her kids at age 15? Shes definetly a top 10 worst parent.


    I'm not surprised that some poor excuse for a parent would demand support from their kids... what surprises me is that the province may force the kids to pay.

  3. by avatar Brenda
    Tue Aug 17, 2010 8:14 pm
    What makes her a "dependent parent"?

    I am sorry, but I don't get where she gets the nerve from to sue her kids. I hope she loses, the kids win, counter sue her for all costs made and emotional stress, plus being a bad parent since they were 15.

  4. by avatar QBall
    Tue Aug 17, 2010 8:27 pm
    Apparently there is a law in B.C. called the Parents' Maintenance Act (section 90 of the Family Relations Act) that was enacted in 1922 which requires children to support their dependent parents. This is the section the fat cow of a mom is suing under. This explains why the judge has ordered the kids to pay $10/month until the case is reviewed (judge still has to follow the law). The law is archaic and needs to be struck down if you ask me. This woman has some balls pulling this stupid stunt, plus what's even more mind-boggling is the bitch has has two other teenage sons at age 71.

  5. by avatar Brenda
    Tue Aug 17, 2010 8:32 pm
    I'm thinking those were here teenage grandsons, and it was the daughter in law talking...

  6. by avatar QBall
    Tue Aug 17, 2010 8:57 pm
    "Brenda" said
    I'm thinking those were here teenage grandsons, and it was the daughter in law talking...


    Oops, so they are. My bad. Got confused with Sherry and Shirley.

  7. by avatar Freakinoldguy
    Tue Aug 17, 2010 10:20 pm
    His mother's lawsuit is against only four of five children. Her second youngest son, Darryl, has spent time in and out of jail and cannot be located.



    Is there any wonder why Darryl can't be found?

    Prison would probably have been alot more stable and loving environment than living with this bitch. 8O



view comments in forum
Page 1

You need to be a member of CKA and be logged into the site, to comment on news.

  • Login
  • Register (free)
 Share  Digg It Bookmark to del.icio.us Share on Facebook


Share on Facebook Submit page to Reddit
CKA About |  Legal |  Advertise |  Sitemap |  Contact   canadian mobile newsMobile

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2025 by Canadaka.net