news Canadian News
Good Afternoon Guest | login or register
  • Home
    • Canadian News
    • Popular News
    • News Voting Log
    • News Images
  • Forums
    • Recent Topics Scroll
    •  
    • Politics Forums
    • Sports Forums
    • Regional Forums
  • Content
    • Achievements
    • Canadian Content
    • Famous Canadians
    • Famous Quotes
    • Jokes
    • Canadian Maps
  • Photos
    • Picture Gallery
    • Wallpapers
    • Recent Activity
  • About
    • About
    • Contact
    • Link to Us
    • Points
    • Statistics
  • Shop
  • Register
    • Gold Membership
  • Archive
    • Canadian TV
    • Canadian Webcams
    • Groups
    • Links
    • Top 10's
    • Reviews
    • CKA Radio
    • Video
    • Weather

Canadian Navy�s ships risk being banned from fo

Canadian Content
20704news upnews down
Link Related to Canada in some say

Canadian Navy�s ships risk being banned from foreign ports


Military | 207035 hits | Aug 06 1:00 pm | Posted by: Scape
17 Comment

The Canadian Navy�s two aging oil tanker supply ships risk being barred from docking at European and American ports over environmental concerns, warns an internal cabinet-level briefing note. The document, obtained by The Globe and Mail, warns the poss

Comments

  1. by avatar QBall
    Fri Aug 06, 2010 9:52 pm
    And the Navy reaches a new low, thanks to the politicians. What a way to celebrate 100 years!

  2. by avatar bootlegga
    Fri Aug 06, 2010 10:05 pm
    Sigh...

  3. by avatar Freakinoldguy
    Fri Aug 06, 2010 10:11 pm
    This is just more politcal bullshit. Can anyone name and instance of a Canadian AOR, Provider included, having a "major" oil spill.

    So while I agree with the replacement of the two remaining Tankers, scare mongering isn't the way the Government should be attempting to get the population on side.

  4. by Choban
    Fri Aug 06, 2010 10:12 pm
    I agree...Sigh...

  5. by avatar Dragom
    Sat Aug 07, 2010 12:01 am
    So we can build some new tankers at Esquimalt? That would be great.

    In the mean time... I don't like the idea of the Canadian Navy panhandling for fuel and munitions while on operations.

  6. by avatar Freakinoldguy
    Sat Aug 07, 2010 3:29 am
    "Dragom" said
    So we can build some new tankers at Esquimalt? That would be great.


    Where?

    Shipbuilding capabilites in Esquimalt went the way of the DODO when Yarrows closed down in 87 and surely, you aren't suggesting that FMF and Dockyard get into the ship building business are you?

  7. by avatar Dragom
    Sat Aug 07, 2010 6:04 am
    "Freakinoldguy" said
    So we can build some new tankers at Esquimalt? That would be great.


    Where?

    Shipbuilding capabilites in Esquimalt went the way of the DODO when Yarrows closed down in 87 and surely, you aren't suggesting that FMF and Dockyard get into the ship building business are you?

    I know theres a huge military dry dock there.

    Though maybe it's the wrong kinda dock to build a ship in.

    I thought half the reason they subsidize that dock was so that we could build a ship if we really wanted to.

  8. by avatar Freakinoldguy
    Sat Aug 07, 2010 7:07 am
    "Dragom" said
    So we can build some new tankers at Esquimalt? That would be great.


    Where?

    Shipbuilding capabilites in Esquimalt went the way of the DODO when Yarrows closed down in 87 and surely, you aren't suggesting that FMF and Dockyard get into the ship building business are you?

    I know theres a huge military dry dock there.

    Though maybe it's the wrong kinda dock to build a ship in.

    I thought half the reason they subsidize that dock was so that we could build a ship if we really wanted to.


    Washington Marine Group owns the Graving Dock now and use it for repair work, but it takes considerably more resources than a Graving Dock to build a ship the size of these Tankers.

    Unfortunately, succesive Governments allowed the West Coast ship building industry to wither on the vine in favor of keeping Lauzon Quebec and St John New Brunswick afloat.

    So consequently if and when these new ships are built it will likely be in one of the two aforementioned places.

  9. by avatar QBall
    Sat Aug 07, 2010 12:14 pm
    "Freakinoldguy" said
    Washington Marine Group owns the Graving Dock now and use it for repair work, but it takes considerably more resources than a Graving Dock to build a ship the size of these Tankers.

    Unfortunately, succesive Governments allowed the West Coast ship building industry to wither on the vine in favor of keeping Lauzon Quebec and St John New Brunswick afloat.

    So consequently if and when these new ships are built it will likely be in one of the two aforementioned places.


    The Graving Dock is owned by the federal government, not the Washington Marine Group. Companies that use the dock (including the two biggest: Victoria Shipyards and Esquimalt Drydock now that CME went bankrupt) rent the time from the federal government.

  10. by avatar Gunnair  Gold Member
    Sat Aug 07, 2010 7:23 pm
    "Freakinoldguy" said
    So we can build some new tankers at Esquimalt? That would be great.


    Where?

    Shipbuilding capabilites in Esquimalt went the way of the DODO when Yarrows closed down in 87 and surely, you aren't suggesting that FMF and Dockyard get into the ship building business are you?

    Victoria shipyards is still there, but they build smaller ships like the ORCAs.

  11. by avatar Freakinoldguy
    Sat Aug 07, 2010 8:16 pm
    "QBall" said
    Washington Marine Group owns the Graving Dock now and use it for repair work, but it takes considerably more resources than a Graving Dock to build a ship the size of these Tankers.

    Unfortunately, succesive Governments allowed the West Coast ship building industry to wither on the vine in favor of keeping Lauzon Quebec and St John New Brunswick afloat.

    So consequently if and when these new ships are built it will likely be in one of the two aforementioned places.


    The Graving Dock is owned by the federal government, not the Washington Marine Group. Companies that use the dock (including the two biggest: Victoria Shipyards and Esquimalt Drydock now that CME went bankrupt) rent the time from the federal government.

    My mistake. Washinton marine group only owns Vancouver Shipyard and Vancouver Drydock.

  12. by avatar Freakinoldguy
    Sat Aug 07, 2010 8:25 pm
    Here's an interesting link and by the article it seems the Washinton Marine Group wants the West Coast to get it's share of major shipbuilding from the Federal Government.

    http://www.washingtonmarinegroup.com/docs/cansailb.pdf

    It'd be nice to see some major shipbuilding capability on the west coast again, but given politics I won't hold my breath.

  13. by avatar EyeBrock
    Sat Aug 07, 2010 11:33 pm
    Just more crap from our media that would rather report on anything remotely negative to do with the CF or the cops than say a native reserve attacking the police and running them out of town.

    http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/nat ... le1663733/

  14. by avatar Bodah
    Sun Aug 08, 2010 1:18 am
    I'm glad we got called out.

    Better to be banned than be responsible for an oil spill I say.

    The Conservative government announced in July that it will spend $2.6-billion to replace the navy�s two auxiliary oil replenishment vessels � the HMCS Protecteur and the HMCS Preserver (currently docked for maintenance)


    Don't worry lefties its been taken care of.



view comments in forum
Page 1 2

You need to be a member of CKA and be logged into the site, to comment on news.

  • Login
  • Register (free)
 Share  Digg It Bookmark to del.icio.us Share on Facebook


Share on Facebook Submit page to Reddit
CKA About |  Legal |  Advertise |  Sitemap |  Contact   canadian mobile newsMobile

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2025 by Canadaka.net