news Canadian News
Good Afternoon Guest | login or register
  • Home
    • Canadian News
    • Popular News
    • News Voting Log
    • News Images
  • Forums
    • Recent Topics Scroll
    •  
    • Politics Forums
    • Sports Forums
    • Regional Forums
  • Content
    • Achievements
    • Canadian Content
    • Famous Canadians
    • Famous Quotes
    • Jokes
    • Canadian Maps
  • Photos
    • Picture Gallery
    • Wallpapers
    • Recent Activity
  • About
    • About
    • Contact
    • Link to Us
    • Points
    • Statistics
  • Shop
  • Register
    • Gold Membership
  • Archive
    • Canadian TV
    • Canadian Webcams
    • Groups
    • Links
    • Top 10's
    • Reviews
    • CKA Radio
    • Video
    • Weather

Former Canadian commander and subordinate charg

Canadian Content
20729news upnews down
Link Related to Canada in some say

Former Canadian commander and subordinate charged


Military | 207292 hits | Jul 12 12:14 pm | Posted by: Hyack
5 Comment

Brig.-Gen. Daniel M�nard, the former commander of Canada's war effort in Afghanistan, and his subordinate, Master Cpl. Bianka Langlois, have been charged by military police after admitting to a sexual affair while on duty.

Comments

  1. by avatar GreenTiger
    Tue Jul 13, 2010 5:18 pm
    Isn't charging them a bit excessive?

  2. by stokes
    Tue Jul 13, 2010 6:16 pm
    Nope, they will first be charge with section 129 of the National Defense Act: Conduct unbecoming, then maybe 1 or 2 ore things, but 129 is the "Catch-all" and everyone in the forces who gets charged will also see this in addition to the specific charge for their offense. Usually carries a fine up to 60% of monthly pay or up to 21 days confinement, but the good general will just get a fine and a reprimand.

  3. by avatar Wullu
    Tue Jul 13, 2010 10:31 pm
    Actually he has two counts of NDA-129 and one of NDA-139, obstruction of justice. That one could smart a bit.

    She has a single catch all 129 charge.


    Of course, if you read the headline from CP, he has been charged with sexual misconduct. Ahhh nothing like lying through their teeth for a catchy headline.

  4. by avatar Guy_Fawkes
    Tue Jul 13, 2010 10:36 pm
    Looks good on em

  5. by avatar Wullu
    Tue Jul 13, 2010 11:09 pm
    They would both have to be certifiable to take it beyond a summary trial. And her case especially, given the coverage this has recieved, any assisting officer capable of standing up right will get it dismissed due to the contamination of the coverage.



view comments in forum
Page 1

You need to be a member of CKA and be logged into the site, to comment on news.

  • Login
  • Register (free)
 Share  Digg It Bookmark to del.icio.us Share on Facebook


Share on Facebook Submit page to Reddit
CKA About |  Legal |  Advertise |  Sitemap |  Contact   canadian mobile newsMobile

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2025 by Canadaka.net