news Canadian News
Good Afternoon Guest | login or register
  • Home
    • Canadian News
    • Popular News
    • News Voting Log
    • News Images
  • Forums
    • Recent Topics Scroll
    •  
    • Politics Forums
    • Sports Forums
    • Regional Forums
  • Content
    • Achievements
    • Canadian Content
    • Famous Canadians
    • Famous Quotes
    • Jokes
    • Canadian Maps
  • Photos
    • Picture Gallery
    • Wallpapers
    • Recent Activity
  • About
    • About
    • Contact
    • Link to Us
    • Points
    • Statistics
  • Shop
  • Register
    • Gold Membership
  • Archive
    • Canadian TV
    • Canadian Webcams
    • Groups
    • Links
    • Top 10's
    • Reviews
    • CKA Radio
    • Video
    • Weather

Ottawa will buy the F-35

Canadian Content
20701news upnews down
Link Related to Canada in some say

Ottawa will buy the F-35


Military | 206997 hits | Jul 10 10:49 am | Posted by: Scape
16 Comment

The Council of Ministers of the Harper government has approved in the last days of purchase of new fighter aircraft to replace the CF-18, Le Devoir has learned. Tel que le souhaitent les Forces canadiennes, Ottawa va acheter le F-35 Joint Strike Fighter (

Comments

  1. by avatar GreenTiger
    Sat Jul 10, 2010 6:38 pm
    These will come in handy if the Chinese pull their 20% Arctic Rights BS. You can deliver their warships death from above.

  2. by avatar bootlegga
    Sat Jul 10, 2010 6:45 pm
    I still wish we were buying a twin engine plane instead of a single engine one. Unlike everyone else participating, we've got huge expanses of Arctic territory to patrol, and if the engine dies, so will the pilot and the plane.


    BTW I love this Google translation!

    "The Council of Ministers of the Harper government"

    Council of Ministers? WTF is that?

    "The U.S. is planning to purchase more than 2,400 copies"

    Apparently planes and CDs are the same thing... :wink:

    "Canada is an economic partner of the F-35 since 1997"

    Shouldn't that be was? :lol:

  3. by avatar Proculation
    Sat Jul 10, 2010 7:10 pm
    LOL at the translation.

    For the planes, we were due. The CF-18 are 30 years old. We have a lot of space to watch. And there's also our duty with the NORAD.

  4. by avatar Arctic_Menace
    Mon Jul 12, 2010 3:03 am
    Single engine, rather expensive, and a lower overall fleet capacity than we had/have. Sounds like trouble to me.

  5. by avatar sandorski
    Mon Jul 12, 2010 3:07 am
    "bootlegga" said
    I still wish we were buying a twin engine plane instead of a single engine one. Unlike everyone else participating, we've got huge expanses of Arctic territory to patrol, and if the engine dies, so will the pilot and the plane.


    BTW I love this Google translation!

    "The Council of Ministers of the Harper government"

    Council of Ministers? WTF is that?

    "The U.S. is planning to purchase more than 2,400 copies"

    Apparently planes and CDs are the same thing... :wink:

    "Canada is an economic partner of the F-35 since 1997"

    Shouldn't that be was? :lol:


    Plane will die, Pilot will Eject.

  6. by avatar HyperionTheEvil
    Mon Jul 12, 2010 3:14 am
    We'd have been better off with the Eurofighter

  7. by avatar Freakinoldguy
    Mon Jul 12, 2010 3:54 am
    What's the best plane isn't really the question here, the government is likely trying to recoup some of the millions they put in for the R&D of the F-35.

    It'd be another political boondoggle if they poured millions into that consortium and then went out and bought another Fighter.

  8. by avatar Robair
    Mon Jul 12, 2010 5:51 am
    "sandorski" said
    I still wish we were buying a twin engine plane instead of a single engine one. Unlike everyone else participating, we've got huge expanses of Arctic territory to patrol, and if the engine dies, so will the pilot and the plane.

    Plane will die, Pilot will Eject.
    and die.
    It's the arctic...

  9. by avatar ShepherdsDog
    Mon Jul 12, 2010 6:23 am
    bears will learn to watch the skies for snacks.

  10. by avatar sandorski
    Mon Jul 12, 2010 8:22 am
    "Robair" said
    I still wish we were buying a twin engine plane instead of a single engine one. Unlike everyone else participating, we've got huge expanses of Arctic territory to patrol, and if the engine dies, so will the pilot and the plane.

    Plane will die, Pilot will Eject.
    and die.
    It's the arctic...

    Uhh, no. It's not Space or the surface of the Sun.

  11. by avatar bootlegga
    Mon Jul 12, 2010 2:12 pm
    "Freakinoldguy" said
    What's the best plane isn't really the question here, the government is likely trying to recoup some of the millions they put in for the R&D of the F-35.

    It'd be another political boondoggle if they poured millions into that consortium and then went out and bought another Fighter.


    Ahhh, in the whole scheme of defence spending/federal budgets, $150 million is chump change (we spent $1.3 billion on four transport planes a couple of years ago).

    What we should be doing is buying two fleets of planes, one of the F-35, and one of a dual engine plane (F/A-18E or Typhoon).

  12. by avatar bootlegga
    Mon Jul 12, 2010 2:13 pm
    "Robair" said
    I still wish we were buying a twin engine plane instead of a single engine one. Unlike everyone else participating, we've got huge expanses of Arctic territory to patrol, and if the engine dies, so will the pilot and the plane.

    Plane will die, Pilot will Eject.
    and die.
    It's the arctic...

    I didn't write that... :wink:

  13. by avatar Robair
    Mon Jul 12, 2010 4:07 pm
    I didn't write that... :wink:

    "bootlegga" said
    Sorry! I scwed up the quote!


    :oops:

  14. by avatar BartSimpson  Gold Member
    Mon Jul 12, 2010 4:27 pm
    The shortcoming with the Eurofighter is the absolute certainty that every last one of the secrets concerned with it were long ago communicated to the Russians and the Chinese. The F-35 is not so wonderful, IMHO, as it is the economy fighter that tries to do too many things at once and does none of them in a superior fashion.

    Hate to say, but for now I'd be more inclined to order another run of the CF-18 and update the avionics so they can carry the newer payloads.



view comments in forum
Page 1 2

You need to be a member of CKA and be logged into the site, to comment on news.

  • Login
  • Register (free)
 Share  Digg It Bookmark to del.icio.us Share on Facebook


Who voted on this?

  • WDHIII Sat Jul 10, 2010 11:01 am
Share on Facebook Submit page to Reddit
CKA About |  Legal |  Advertise |  Sitemap |  Contact   canadian mobile newsMobile

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2025 by Canadaka.net