news Canadian News
Good Afternoon Guest | login or register
  • Home
    • Canadian News
    • Popular News
    • News Voting Log
    • News Images
  • Forums
    • Recent Topics Scroll
    •  
    • Politics Forums
    • Sports Forums
    • Regional Forums
  • Content
    • Achievements
    • Canadian Content
    • Famous Canadians
    • Famous Quotes
    • Jokes
    • Canadian Maps
  • Photos
    • Picture Gallery
    • Wallpapers
    • Recent Activity
  • About
    • About
    • Contact
    • Link to Us
    • Points
    • Statistics
  • Shop
  • Register
    • Gold Membership
  • Archive
    • Canadian TV
    • Canadian Webcams
    • Groups
    • Links
    • Top 10's
    • Reviews
    • CKA Radio
    • Video
    • Weather

Spanking may lower a child's IQ: Study

Canadian Content
20691news upnews down

Spanking may lower a child's IQ: Study


lifestyle | 206905 hits | Sep 25 8:50 am | Posted by: WDHIII
14 Comment

Children who are spared the rod may grow up to have higher IQs than those who are spanked, suggests a study by one of North America's foremost child psychology experts.

Comments

  1. by avatar Public_Domain
    Fri Sep 25, 2009 6:41 pm
    :|

  2. by avatar BartSimpson  Gold Member
    Fri Sep 25, 2009 6:47 pm
    I guess you could also come to the conclusion that kids with lower IQ's do more stuff they should be spanked for.

  3. by avatar Brenda
    Fri Sep 25, 2009 6:52 pm
    So I take it, for this study, that they got a group of moms and children, and told the moms to spank the child on the butt at least 3 times a week. They also had a control group of moms and kids. and the kids were told to behave exactly the same, but the moms were told NOT to spank.

    :?

  4. by DerbyX
    Fri Sep 25, 2009 6:56 pm
    Human beings are too complex to make such declarations. Too many variables to control and too many unknowns. What factor did genetics play? Pregnancy nutritional or stimulation in the womb. Who severe were the spankings. What level of commitment did the parents play in child education.

    I'd say just as likely a conclusion is that parents who spank are less likely to provide a nurturing education environment rather then the spanking itself.

  5. by DerbyX
    Fri Sep 25, 2009 7:00 pm
    With studies like this they are often part of the "publish or perish" academic doctrine that more then anything is responsible for the studies that make you scratch your head.

    Academics need to get published and as long as they aren't flubbing the data (even when they do sometimes) then they can make a conclusion and print it up.

    Take milk and or eggs (and flour and beat). Every few years they print a new study saying its either good or bad for you. Every study comes with viable data to "support" the conclusion.

  6. by avatar Brenda
    Fri Sep 25, 2009 7:02 pm
    Oh! Talking about that! Did you hear the latest study result?
    Not only salt is rising your bloodpressure, sugar does too! :lol:

  7. by avatar raydan
    Fri Sep 25, 2009 7:16 pm
    "Brenda" said
    Oh! Talking about that! Did you hear the latest study result?
    Not only salt is rising your bloodpressure, sugar does too! :lol:

    I know something else that raises my bloodpressure
    But I'm not about to give that up. 8O

  8. by avatar Proculation
    Fri Sep 25, 2009 7:19 pm
    "raydan" said
    Oh! Talking about that! Did you hear the latest study result?
    Not only salt is rising your bloodpressure, sugar does too! :lol:

    I know something else that raises my bloodpressure
    But I'm not about to give that up. 8O

    Is it about pandas ?

  9. by avatar Zipperfish  Gold Member
    Fri Sep 25, 2009 7:20 pm
    "BartSimpson" said
    I guess you could also come to the conclusion that kids with lower IQ's do more stuff they should be spanked for.


    Score one for common sense. R=UP

  10. by avatar raydan
    Fri Sep 25, 2009 7:25 pm
    "Zipperfish" said
    I guess you could also come to the conclusion that kids with lower IQ's do more stuff they should be spanked for.


    Score one for common sense. R=UP
    Sometimes the simplest answer is the best.

    This just in:
    Taller people hit their heads on low-hanging objects more often than shorter people.

    Must mean they have poorer eyesight.

  11. by avatar Proculation
    Fri Sep 25, 2009 7:32 pm
    Being dead may lower responsiveness.

  12. by avatar BartSimpson  Gold Member
    Fri Sep 25, 2009 8:03 pm
    "Proculation" said
    Being dead may lower responsiveness.


    Sounds like a side effect of a new drug... XD

  13. by stokes
    Fri Sep 25, 2009 8:12 pm
    Dont forget the all time favorite:

    Masturbation makes you blind...been doing it for years and still see 20/20











    with my glasses on :lol: :lol:

  14. by avatar Brenda
    Fri Sep 25, 2009 9:15 pm
    "Proculation" said
    Being dead may lower responsiveness.

    And we paid you exactly how much again to get a study done that made you come to this conclusion? :lol:



view comments in forum
Page 1

You need to be a member of CKA and be logged into the site, to comment on news.

  • Login
  • Register (free)
 Share  Digg It Bookmark to del.icio.us Share on Facebook


Share on Facebook Submit page to Reddit
CKA About |  Legal |  Advertise |  Sitemap |  Contact   canadian mobile newsMobile

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2025 by Canadaka.net