Mulroney doubts Schreiber affair will tarnish his legacy

"kenmore" said
Well said bootlegga... was thinking he doesn't have to worry about that tarnishing his legacy.. he paved the road for that while in power... next up... harper

Zipperfish...

I sure hope you're getting paid for your efforts.

"kenmore" said
Where is Bassano?

Former prime minister Brian Mulroney says he may have made some errors in judgment in his lifetime, but he isn't worried that the suggestion of impropriety in his dealings with Karlheinz Schreiber will affect his legacy.

"gigs" said
Where is Bassano?

"gigs" said
Where is Bassano?

"bootlegga" said
..... Alberta and Manitoba do NOT share a border...

"gigs" said
Where is Bassano?

"bootlegga" said
Where is Bassano?

[MONTREAL � Aug. 10, 2009] � An Angus Reid Strategies survey conducted as German-Canadian businessman Karlheinz Schreiber was about to be deported from Canada shows that Canadians did not pay much attention to the public inquiry into Schreiber's dealings with former Canadian prime minister Brian Mulroney, and finds that the population became more irritated with the case and its details as the process went along.
In the online survey of a representative national sample of 1,005 Canadians, only 31 per cent of respondents say they followed stories related to the so-called Oliphant Commission very or moderately closely over the past few months.
Seven-in-ten Canadians either paid little attention to the proceedings (32%) or none at all (38%). Almost half of respondents in both Alberta and Quebec say they did not follow the inquiry closely at all.
When this survey's findings are compared to those of an Angus Reid Strategies poll conducted in May 2008, it becomes clear that Canadians were turned off by the affair.
Four-in-five respondents (80%) believe that we'll never get to the bottom of what happened between Mulroney and Schreiber, up six points since May 2008. Also, almost two-thirds of Canadians (64%) say they are tired of hearing about the Mulroney-Schreiber controversy, a five-point increase since last year.
Also, 66 per cent of respondents believe the public inquiry into the Mulroney-Schreiber controversy was a waste of money, while 24 per cent disagree with this statement. In May 2008, as the terms of the inquiry were being defined, 58 per cent of Canadians believed the process would be a waste of money.
In testimony provided to a House of Commons ethics committee and to the Oliphant Inquiry, Mulroney and Schreiber have offered differing accounts on the amount of money that exchanged hands. About one-in-four Canadians (23%) believe Schreiber is telling the truth when he claims to have paid Mulroney $300,000, while one-in-ten Canadians (10%) think the former prime minister is being honest when he says he received $225,000 from Schreiber. Still, a large proportion of the population (44%) finds neither man credible.