 Canadian cellphone rates among world's worst The average Canadian cellphone user is paying among the highest bills in the developed world, according to a new international study.Commentsview comments in forum Page 1 2 You need to be a member of CKA and be logged into the site, to comment on news. |
Share
Who voted on this?
|
Mobile
All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2025 by Canadaka.net
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2025 by Canadaka.net
No more of my money to Bell, Rogers or Telus.
Tell me about it! Canada is terribly expensive with a lot of things, not only cell phones.
Cable television, groceries are things that are expensive. I think I mentioned it all before somewhere...
If that so why isn't the US the cheapest?
3 year damn contracts, service fees up the wazoo, charged for sending and receiving text messages, getting threat letters of being sent to collections from the phone company three days before the bill in question even arrives in the mail (Rogers and my ex's experiences)
My gf from Australia won't even think about getting a cell plan here in Canada because it's so screwed up.
And should I even mention that about a couple of years or so ago an investigation was on-going in regards to additional hidden fees each cell company charges their customers?
Those hidden fees were actual fees in the early 90's that were used to help fund the further development of towers and reception accross Canada.
Those same fees were supposed to stop by the end of the decade, considering the majority of location services were all up and ready by that time..... yet it's been found those same fees are still being billed to customers under alternative charges.
Source: (I'd hate to post the whole thing, but serously, you got to read this)
Sask. court certifies class-action cellphone suit
http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/s ... 9/20070919
"When the companies first had cellular service you had to have a wireless fee, and the companies got into the habit of charging this," Tony Merchant, the lawyer who initiated the suit, told CTV Regina.
"When they weren't required to pay the wireless fee, it was sort of like a crack cocaine that they were used to," he said. "They just kept charging, taking the money and mis-describing the money they were receiving."
A Saskatchewan court certified the lawsuit against Canada's cellphone providers on Tuesday.
The suit, first launched in 2004, alleges Canada's cellphone users are owed $12 billion plus interest for unfair "system access" fees collected over the years.
After two weeks of arguments from lawyers for the class action and the cell phone companies, the Court of Queen's Bench in Regina ruled Tuesday that the suit has enough validity to go forward.
It is described as the largest class-action in Canadian history, potentially affecting every cellphone user in the country. Currently, there are 7,500 complainants signed onto the suit.
"As a financial story for these companies it has an absolute blockbuster impact upon them. So if the industry has a judgment of $20 billion delivered, the impact would obviously be huge," Merchant said
The suit claims the companies are practicing "unjust enrichment" by charging the so-called "system access" or fees.
Merchant maintains cellphone service providers have convinced customers the fees are required under federal regulations.
"They're gouging people. They're receiving money they ought not to receive and people believe they're paying it with good and just cause, and they're not."
The practice effectively allows companies to advertise lower prices, then boost the cost of cellphone plans through hidden fees, he said.
Here are the monthly subscriber access fees charged by Canada's major cellphone providers:
� Rogers Wireless: $6.95
� Telus Mobility: $6.95
� Bell Mobility: $8.95, after a recent $2 increase
An investigation by the Toronto Star several years ago revealed many employees of cellphone companies were incorrectly telling customers the fees were required by the Canadian Radio-Television and Telecommunications Commission.
While required by the CRTC when the cellphone industry was in its infancy, the fees are no longer legally required, but are still being charged.
The investigation also found the fees would generate about $800 million annually for the industry.
Merchant said that number is now closer to $1.3 or $1.5 billion.
Critics argue the fees are necessary in order to allow cellphone companies to continue doing business, and point out that the court's certification of the class-action suit doesn't mean the case has been deemed to have merit.
Doesn't that just piss you off?
This is why I haven't bought a cell yet, and probably never will until I move to another country. Canada's Cell Phones are a friggin racket that's been allowed to go on for far too long.
Canadians falling into this usage category shelled out an average of $500 US a year for their cellphone service, compared with $635 for Americans and $508 for Spaniards. Dutch users had the cheapest rates, with an annual expenditure of only $131 for the sample plan."
I realize there are many bad deals and stupid contracts etc, but has anyone considered the maintenance costs of a country like the US or Canada compared with the Dutch? You can fit 5 Hollands inside Eastern Canada alone. I'm not really trying to defend these rates but merely comparing what people pay from country to country doesn't really tell us much.
Normally my bill is $40 but last month it was $100.
Holland is more socialist than Canada
The price of phones and insane contracts prevented me from getting a phone for almost 5 years after I got back. When I did, I bought a cell phone for $50 and went on pay-as-you-go.
It's not collusion or lack of competition as some people here have speculated. We have three national cellular competitors, which should be plenty of competitors (Japan has three as well and their prices are far lower than here).
The problem we have is the fact that we as a nation are so spread out. We have 32 million people in an area 27 times the size of Japan or the UK. Therefore, providers have to spend a fortune building the infrastructure to support cellular service. I had a cell phone back in the late 80/early 90s and the service area was very small. A lot of services that require a big infrastructure commitment (like rail service for example) are simply not economically viable without a dense population base.
That's why Regina doesn't have a subway/LRT, but there is rail service between Toronto and Montreal. In places like Holland or Japan, the population is far denser, so investing in infrastructure is easier because you have far more potential customers once it is complete. The constant innovation in cellular technology (analog-digital-3G) has cost us too, because our providers are constantly spending money to upgrade existing networks, instead of expanding coverage areas.