 Public will be informed about fate of bus beheaderLaw & Order | 208055 hits | May 29 7:48 pm | Posted by: Hyack  WINNIPEG -- The public will find out after all whether the man who decapitated a fellow Greyhound passenger and then mutilated his body will be kept in an institution or granted a conditional release.Commentsview comments in forum Page 1 You need to be a member of CKA and be logged into the site, to comment on news. |
Share
|
Mobile
All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2025 by Canadaka.net
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2025 by Canadaka.net
After he is found guilty, he should be locked up for life. I don't care where, as far as I am concerned he gets treatment, but he still should be locked up for life. With no chance of parole. IMO, there is not much difference between someone who KNEW what he was doing and killed someone, and someone who didn't rationally know. There is still someone dead. Pay for it.
He's not a Canadian citizen. Why are we keeping him?
I heard he was... but if he turns out not to be, I have no idea why he hasn't been deported already.
He's not a Canadian citizen. Why are we keeping him?
Immigrant from China, he became a citizen in 2005.
Let's face it.. I doubt there's much demand in Canada for foreign, homicidal wackos so we can probably send him back.
After he is found guilty, he should be locked up for life. I don't care where, as far as I am concerned he gets treatment, but he still should be locked up for life. With no chance of parole. IMO, there is not much difference between someone who KNEW what he was doing and killed someone, and someone who didn't rationally know. There is still someone dead. Pay for it.
He's not going to be found guilty. He's already been found NOT GUILTY.
After he is found guilty, he should be locked up for life. I don't care where, as far as I am concerned he gets treatment, but he still should be locked up for life. With no chance of parole. IMO, there is not much difference between someone who KNEW what he was doing and killed someone, and someone who didn't rationally know. There is still someone dead. Pay for it.
He's not going to be found guilty. He's already been found NOT GUILTY.
He has been found mentally ill. If he was found just "not guilty" he would have been walking the streets
He has been found mentally ill. If he was found just "not guilty" he would have been walking the streets
"Mentally ill" isn't a verdict. "Not guilty" by reason of mental disorder, he is. If he can convince the psychiatrists to rub the "INSANE" stamp off his hand, he will be walking the streets. Likely, he'll be locked up for life, but he'll never be anything other than "not guilty" of this murder.
Tell me, what would the difference be if he was found guilty, and completely sane?
Oh, right, he would be out in, say... 10 years
I'm not a psychiatrist, nor a lawyer, nor a judge.
Tell me, what would the difference be if he was found guilty, and completely sane?
Oh, right, he would be out in, say... 10 years
No, if he had been found guilty of 1st degree murder, he'd have gotten a life sentence with no chance of parole for 25 years (minimum sentence for this offence, Brenda). Maybe EyeBrock could comment; he's better versed than I on criminal law.