news Canadian News
Good Afternoon Guest | login or register
  • Home
    • Canadian News
    • Popular News
    • News Voting Log
    • News Images
  • Forums
    • Recent Topics Scroll
    •  
    • Politics Forums
    • Sports Forums
    • Regional Forums
  • Content
    • Achievements
    • Canadian Content
    • Famous Canadians
    • Famous Quotes
    • Jokes
    • Canadian Maps
  • Photos
    • Picture Gallery
    • Wallpapers
    • Recent Activity
  • About
    • About
    • Contact
    • Link to Us
    • Points
    • Statistics
  • Shop
  • Register
    • Gold Membership
  • Archive
    • Canadian TV
    • Canadian Webcams
    • Groups
    • Links
    • Top 10's
    • Reviews
    • CKA Radio
    • Video
    • Weather

New Arctic Response Company Group emerges

Canadian Content
20695news upnews down
Link Related to Canada in some say

New Arctic Response Company Group emerges


Military | 206954 hits | May 20 10:53 am | Posted by: Hyack
28 Comment

Qu�bec, Quebec ― The Voltigeurs de Qu�bec and three other land forces have been assigned an important mandate in the Arctic.

Comments

  1. by avatar maldonsfecht
    Wed May 20, 2009 7:14 pm
    go get 'em boys! :-D

  2. by avatar GreenTiger
    Wed May 20, 2009 7:56 pm
    These days it is necessary.

  3. by Racer62
    Wed May 20, 2009 8:23 pm
    Wow, a handful of militia mixed with some Inuit rangers. A real force to be reckoned.

  4. by avatar Smacle
    Wed May 20, 2009 8:56 pm
    Winter warfare sucks. I feel bad for them.

  5. by avatar Smacle
    Wed May 20, 2009 8:58 pm
    I wonder, in that pic, how far the target is for that Karl-G for them to need binos?

  6. by avatar bootlegga
    Wed May 20, 2009 10:02 pm
    I'd far prefer naval or air reserve units to be added, rather than a few Militia units. Still, it's better than nothing...

  7. by avatar Bacardi4206
    Thu May 21, 2009 2:01 am
    I am not sure what use this will have. I mean if any military threat is present in the artic it will almost certonly be Air or Naval threats. Not sure what a few hundred soldiers can do about that. Unless they got AA guns to combat air threats.

    Seems like a waste to me. Keep the rangers there but put the effort into making more naval battleships and assign them in the artic.

  8. by avatar Canadaka
    Thu May 21, 2009 2:21 am
    Maybe some white camo might help, heh

  9. by avatar SprCForr  Gold Member
    Thu May 21, 2009 2:33 am
    "Smacle" said
    I wonder, in that pic, how far the target is for that Karl-G for them to need binos?


    Firing with the insert at paper maybe?

  10. by avatar SprCForr  Gold Member
    Thu May 21, 2009 2:34 am
    "Canadaka" said
    Maybe some white camo might help, heh


    Doesn't matter a bit on a range. Patrol is a different thing all together.

  11. by avatar SprCForr  Gold Member
    Thu May 21, 2009 2:38 am
    "Bacardi4206" said
    I am not sure what use this will have. I mean if any military threat is present in the artic it will almost certonly be Air or Naval threats. Not sure what a few hundred soldiers can do about that. Unless they got AA guns to combat air threats.

    Seems like a waste to me. Keep the rangers there but put the effort into making more naval battleships and assign them in the artic.


    More info on the threat is required before I could say with any certainty. Troops on the ground have a better loiter time than air and aren't tied to the coastlines.

    I'd suspect that they'd be some kind of "go to" for what the Rangers find/observe. That sort of thing (of course) would hinge on CSOR/Reg F commitment to the north.

  12. by Anonymous
    Thu May 21, 2009 2:58 am
    "Bacardi4206" said
    I am not sure what use this will have. I mean if any military threat is present in the artic it will almost certonly be Air or Naval threats. Not sure what a few hundred soldiers can do about that. Unless they got AA guns to combat air threats.

    Seems like a waste to me. Keep the rangers there but put the effort into making more naval battleships and assign them in the artic.



    Ya,so they can try busting through over ten feet of ice 9 months of the year. :roll:
    Then theres air patrol over an environment that has frequent ground blizzards for 9 months of the year.

    This is a good idea,if anything it will give some guys the experience in the arctic and the more the merrier if their on the ground,they have to understand what it's like first hand and they will,maybe the info they bring back will make some understand why most conventional weaponery wont work.
    There's a reason the use ww2 303 british rifles,they work.
    You got any gun that has grease in it like most modern ones and it will be useless at -50

    Hope this exercise results in more troops getting sent there....on the tundra.
    Where they can actually do some good.

  13. by avatar bootlegga
    Thu May 21, 2009 3:31 am
    I think the point here Ziggy is that we already have an excellent ground force (the Rangers). Why add a few hundred reservists (who likely won't have anywhere near the level of Arctic skills as the Rangers) to the mix?

    Naval and sea assets are needed up there as well, not just more troops.

  14. by avatar SprCForr  Gold Member
    Thu May 21, 2009 4:02 am
    "bootlegga" said

    Naval and sea assets are needed up there as well, not just more troops.


    Yep, way more than troops.



view comments in forum
Page 1 2

You need to be a member of CKA and be logged into the site, to comment on news.

  • Login
  • Register (free)
 Share  Digg It Bookmark to del.icio.us Share on Facebook


Share on Facebook Submit page to Reddit
CKA About |  Legal |  Advertise |  Sitemap |  Contact   canadian mobile newsMobile

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2025 by Canadaka.net