news Canadian News
Good Afternoon Guest | login or register
  • Home
    • Canadian News
    • Popular News
    • News Voting Log
    • News Images
  • Forums
    • Recent Topics Scroll
    •  
    • Politics Forums
    • Sports Forums
    • Regional Forums
  • Content
    • Achievements
    • Canadian Content
    • Famous Canadians
    • Famous Quotes
    • Jokes
    • Canadian Maps
  • Photos
    • Picture Gallery
    • Wallpapers
    • Recent Activity
  • About
    • About
    • Contact
    • Link to Us
    • Points
    • Statistics
  • Shop
  • Register
    • Gold Membership
  • Archive
    • Canadian TV
    • Canadian Webcams
    • Groups
    • Links
    • Top 10's
    • Reviews
    • CKA Radio
    • Video
    • Weather

Benjamin Netanyahu says Iran will not get its h

Canadian Content
20836news upnews down

Benjamin Netanyahu says Iran will not get its hands on nukes


World | 208369 hits | Jan 31 4:44 pm | Posted by: Hyack
16 Comment

JERUSALEM - Benjamin Netanyahu, Israel's leading candidate for prime minister, says Iran will not be armed with a nuclear weapon.

Comments

  1. by avatar GreenTiger
    Sun Feb 01, 2009 10:09 am
    Yahu scares me almost as much as the Iranian President, both look oke they want to wipe each other off the map, which unfortunatly would include the rest of us as well.

  2. by avatar martin14
    Sun Feb 01, 2009 10:22 am
    "GreenTiger" said
    Yahu scares me almost as much as the Iranian President, both look oke they want to wipe each other off the map, which unfortunatly would include the rest of us as well.



    Cant agree, GT.

    If Iran launches a nuke, no one around to support them.


    The Israelis as a first strike would not use nukes,
    rather a big hit like Iraq in .. 84 ?,
    to take out the reactors being built.
    And nothing happened after that.


    Natranz should have been opened years ago. The Iranians
    won't, cause they know what happens 5 minutes after
    it goes on-line.

  3. by avatar Scape
    Sun Feb 01, 2009 10:46 am
    That is only punting the ball down the field. Israel has so many enemies they don't need a nation. A biological/chemical attack could obliterate several key Israeli population centers with the tunnels and a rocket attack there is no way for them to stop that type of attack.

    At some point there is going to be a reckoning. Israel can not hold the entire region at nuclear gun point forever. The leaders of Hamas can be killed with smart bombs but they will just end up getting new members as long as Gaza is little more then an open air prison.

    The constant terror that someone like Netanyahu depends upon for his political base will only drive further the brinkmanship of his realpolitik. No solution will come of this only more death.

  4. by avatar Bacardi4206
    Sun Feb 01, 2009 10:51 am
    "Scape" said
    That is only punting the ball down the field. Israel has so many enemies they don't need a nation. A biological/chemical attack could obliterate several key Israeli population centers with the tunnels and a rocket attack there is no way for them to stop that type of attack.

    At some point there is going to be a reckoning. Israel can not hold the entire region at nuclear gun point forever. The leaders of Hamas can be killed with smart bombs but they will just end up getting new members as long as Gaza is little more then an open air prison.

    The constant terror that someone like Netanyahu depends upon for his political base will only drive further the brinkmanship of his realpolitik. No solution will come of this only more death.


    What other choice does Israel have? They meet new threats every day, you can't just meet a enemy with a gun with a rainbow and smile and expect him to play nice. Real-life is not like that. Every country has used threats, specificly nukes if they have them to warn off enemies and it usually works because nobody want's to get nuked. They also are pretty much always empty threats because nobody want's to start a nuke war. Would mean bad news for everybody.

    They should keep there guns pointed in all directions, but also at the same time try and make peace and build up better relations with everybody around them. Turning there enemies to atleast neutral. I don't think they would ever be friends though.

  5. by avatar Scape
    Sun Feb 01, 2009 11:06 am
    Bacardi, Netanyahu is a hawk and to him the military is a hammer and every problem looks like a nail. You are absolute right that Israeli has the right to exist and in that the right of self defence but when you keep going to the same well for every problem that well dries up. Hamas has been legitimized by the attacks by Israel in January to the Arab world and dealing with them militarily has not defeated Hamas. Do you think if they just had one more week or month or year perhaps ten years that the situation would have been any different?

  6. by avatar martin14
    Sun Feb 01, 2009 11:54 am
    Scape, in what way do you think Hamas has been legitimized ?

  7. by notnuts
    Sun Feb 01, 2009 1:52 pm
    and the killing goe`s on , no end in sight :(

  8. by avatar martin14
    Sun Feb 01, 2009 1:56 pm
    "notnuts" said
    and the killing goe`s on , no end in sight :(




    as long as Hamas keeps lobbing rockets into Israel... nope.


    Bibi is leading the polls, so we'll see about that in a week or so.

  9. by avatar Arctic_Menace
    Sun Feb 01, 2009 2:22 pm
    I wonder if that region will ever see real peace...

  10. by ridenrain
    Sun Feb 01, 2009 7:02 pm
    So will the UN stop it's condemnation of Israel and "solve" the problem, Scape?
    Perhaps there's spme final solution you have in mind?
    :roll:

    Israel has been backed into using force because there's simply no room to negotiate when you're enemies want you dead.

  11. by avatar commanderkai
    Sun Feb 01, 2009 7:08 pm
    "martin14" said
    Scape, in what way do you think Hamas has been legitimized ?


    I must ask the same question, how has this conflict legitimized Hamas?

  12. by ridenrain
    Sun Feb 01, 2009 7:28 pm
    Gee. I wonder why they'd be concerned..

    Hossein Shariatmadari, editor of the Iranian daily Kayhan, who is close to Iranian Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, called to disobey the ban on supplying advanced weapons and ammunition to the Palestinians and the resistance movements. He described the elimination of Israel as a "sacred aspiration" that would purge the world of the sources of corruption.


    http://www.thememriblog.org/blog_personal/en/13365.htm

    The top U.N. nuclear proliferation official refused to take a position on whether Israel should exist as a Jewish state.

    In an interview with the Washington Post published Sunday, Mohammed ElBaradei argued for establishing trust between the West and Iran, blaming both sides for inflaming rhetoric.

    ElBaradei, who directs the International Atomic Energy Agency, likened a positive outcome to such talks to Japan, a country that runs the full nuclear technology cycle without international opprobrium, "because there is trust that this country is not aiming to develop nuclear weapons." The interviewer challenged him, noting that Japan does not advocate the destruction of another country, as Iran does with Israel.

    "There have been a lot of offensive statements, frankly, on the part of Iran, although from what I understand, Iran wants a one-state solution -- not, as reported in the media, that Israel should be wiped off the map," ElBaradei responded.

    That, the interviewer noted, would end Israel's status as a Jewish state.

    "I'm not taking sides on that," ElBaradei replied.

  13. by avatar Scape
    Sun Feb 01, 2009 9:02 pm
    "martin14" said
    Scape, in what way do you think Hamas has been legitimized ?



    Hamas Leaders Meet Iranian Leaders as Rockets Explode in Israel
    Hamas considers Israel�s blockade, which it claims damages Gaza�s economy, as a form of collective punishment against the Arab residents of Gaza. The group cites the blockade as one of its reasons for not renewing the ceasefire agreement with Israel in December, which prompted the Gaza war.


    The blockade was in place before Hamas rose to power. Hamas was the response to that provocation. The Arab leaders would rather deal with Fatah, as their corruption makes them easier to control but that is also the reason why the people who have to live under their rule could no longer tolerate them and chose Hamas instead.

  14. by avatar martin14
    Sun Feb 01, 2009 9:18 pm
    Sorry Scape, meeting Iran, who is their major funder,
    doesnt make Hamas any more legitimate in anyone's eyes.

    They are still a bunch of terrorists, and should be taken out.



    Ever heard of Rafah ?



view comments in forum
Page 1 2

You need to be a member of CKA and be logged into the site, to comment on news.

  • Login
  • Register (free)
 Share  Digg It Bookmark to del.icio.us Share on Facebook


Who voted on this?

  • SaulT Sat Jan 31, 2009 5:24 pm
Share on Facebook Submit page to Reddit
CKA About |  Legal |  Advertise |  Sitemap |  Contact   canadian mobile newsMobile

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2025 by Canadaka.net