news Canadian News
Good Morning Guest | login or register
  • Home
    • Canadian News
    • Popular News
    • News Voting Log
    • News Images
  • Forums
    • Recent Topics Scroll
    •  
    • Politics Forums
    • Sports Forums
    • Regional Forums
  • Content
    • Achievements
    • Canadian Content
    • Famous Canadians
    • Famous Quotes
    • Jokes
    • Canadian Maps
  • Photos
    • Picture Gallery
    • Wallpapers
    • Recent Activity
  • About
    • About
    • Contact
    • Link to Us
    • Points
    • Statistics
  • Shop
  • Register
    • Gold Membership
  • Archive
    • Canadian TV
    • Canadian Webcams
    • Groups
    • Links
    • Top 10's
    • Reviews
    • CKA Radio
    • Video
    • Weather

Federal government to go $64-billion in red

Canadian Content
20799news upnews down
Link Related to Canada in some say

Federal government to go $64-billion in red


Political | 208002 hits | Jan 22 1:22 pm | Posted by: DerbyX
33 Comment

Comments

  1. by avatar Arctic_Menace
    Fri Jan 23, 2009 12:16 am
    Jim looks like he's looking up at Big Daddy Canada saying: "please don't hurt me..." :lol:

  2. by Anonymous
    Fri Jan 23, 2009 12:19 am
    Do you want fiscal stimulus or not? make up your mind Derby?

  3. by DerbyX
    Fri Jan 23, 2009 12:29 am
    I never said run a massive deficit nor hand over barrels of cash to the automakers. This isn't a stimulus budget. Its a "we are sticking it to our kids budget".

    Kinda pathetic you guys were all screaming about how the Liberal and NDP budgets would lead to deficits (when they were at least costed) yet now fully accept your party running 30+ deficits per year. :roll:

    At least now we know why Harper did not release a costed platform. He would have been found out as the deficit magnet that he is.

  4. by avatar RUEZ
    Fri Jan 23, 2009 12:42 am
    "DerbyX" said
    I never said run a massive deficit nor hand over barrels of cash to the automakers. This isn't a stimulus budget. Its a "we are sticking it to our kids budget".

    Kinda pathetic you guys were all screaming about how the Liberal and NDP budgets would lead to deficits (when they were at least costed) yet now fully accept your party running 30+ deficits per year. :roll:

    At least now we know why Harper did not release a costed platform. He would have been found out as the deficit magnet that he is.

    Who's you guys?

  5. by DerbyX
    Fri Jan 23, 2009 12:50 am
    "RUEZ" said
    I never said run a massive deficit nor hand over barrels of cash to the automakers. This isn't a stimulus budget. Its a "we are sticking it to our kids budget".

    Kinda pathetic you guys were all screaming about how the Liberal and NDP budgets would lead to deficits (when they were at least costed) yet now fully accept your party running 30+ deficits per year. :roll:

    At least now we know why Harper did not release a costed platform. He would have been found out as the deficit magnet that he is.

    Who's you guys?

    The guys that were screaming that the Liberal and NDP budgets were going to run massive deficits.

  6. by avatar Tricks
    Fri Jan 23, 2009 12:50 am
    I sincerely hope this isn't true.

  7. by Bibbi
    Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:05 am
    This could get very bizarre if the budget is rejected by the opposition because of the potential deficit.

  8. by Anonymous
    Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:14 am
    yeah, we can replace the conservatives with a coalition of clowns who planned to drop 30 billion at the drop of the hat.

  9. by avatar RUEZ
    Fri Jan 23, 2009 2:02 am
    The coalition wanted spending, and they got it.

  10. by DerbyX
    Fri Jan 23, 2009 2:15 am
    No, the conservatives wanted spending because thats what they thought the public wanted. They also believe the public wants tax cuts right along with it which is probably true since everybody wants tax cuts.

    They are betting on the public supporting their combination more then they will balk at the massive deficit it sticks us with.

    The coalition had various measures to avoid a massive deficit be they rollbacks on corporate taxes, GST cuts, or a carbon tax.

    Thats why they would not be running a massive deficit like Harper is and why this is Harpers ball to run with and his responsibility.

  11. by Anonymous
    Fri Jan 23, 2009 2:17 am
    "DerbyX" said
    No, the conservatives wanted spending because thats what they thought the public wanted. They also believe the public wants tax cuts right along with it which is probably true since everybody wants tax cuts.

    They are betting on the public supporting their combination more then they will balk at the massive deficit it sticks us with.

    The coalition had various measures to avoid a massive deficit be they rollbacks on corporate taxes, GST cuts, or a carbon tax.

    Thats why they would not be running a massive deficit like Harper is and why this is Harpers ball to run with and his responsibility.



    XD fuck you're incredible... Thanos summed you up the other night :P

  12. by DerbyX
    Fri Jan 23, 2009 2:18 am
    "mtbr" said
    No, the conservatives wanted spending because thats what they thought the public wanted. They also believe the public wants tax cuts right along with it which is probably true since everybody wants tax cuts.

    They are betting on the public supporting their combination more then they will balk at the massive deficit it sticks us with.

    The coalition had various measures to avoid a massive deficit be they rollbacks on corporate taxes, GST cuts, or a carbon tax.

    Thats why they would not be running a massive deficit like Harper is and why this is Harpers ball to run with and his responsibility.



    XD fuck you're incredible... Thanos summed you up the other night :P

    I'm not the hack trying to blame everybody else for my parties mistakes. :roll:

  13. by avatar sandorski
    Fri Jan 23, 2009 2:29 am
    Harper didn't do it, he was forced!!!!

    Fine logic there. :roll:

    Makes one wonder if he's fit to Lead.

  14. by avatar Scape
    Fri Jan 23, 2009 2:57 am
    During the debates Harper was on record for saying he would not run a deficit. How can anything he says now be taken as credible for the finical markets? I'm not talking about the voters who will end up paying for this but the markets who have to bank on his word.

    When it comes to dollars and sense, Harper just doesn't add up.



view comments in forum
Page 1 2 3

You need to be a member of CKA and be logged into the site, to comment on news.

  • Login
  • Register (free)
 Share  Digg It Bookmark to del.icio.us Share on Facebook


Who voted on this?

  • mtbr Thu Jan 22, 2009 2:23 pm
Share on Facebook Submit page to Reddit
CKA About |  Legal |  Advertise |  Sitemap |  Contact   canadian mobile newsMobile

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2025 by Canadaka.net