news Canadian News
Good Evening Guest | login or register
  • Home
    • Canadian News
    • Popular News
    • News Voting Log
    • News Images
  • Forums
    • Recent Topics Scroll
    •  
    • Politics Forums
    • Sports Forums
    • Regional Forums
  • Content
    • Achievements
    • Canadian Content
    • Famous Canadians
    • Famous Quotes
    • Jokes
    • Canadian Maps
  • Photos
    • Picture Gallery
    • Wallpapers
    • Recent Activity
  • About
    • About
    • Contact
    • Link to Us
    • Points
    • Statistics
  • Shop
  • Register
    • Gold Membership
  • Archive
    • Canadian TV
    • Canadian Webcams
    • Groups
    • Links
    • Top 10's
    • Reviews
    • CKA Radio
    • Video
    • Weather

Canada home to 94 irradiators U.S. fears pose a

Canadian Content
20813news upnews down
Link Related to Canada in some say

Canada home to 94 irradiators U.S. fears pose a terror risk


Uncle Sam | 208132 hits | Feb 29 10:14 am | Posted by: Hyack
10 Comment

Nearly 100 hospitals, blood banks or universities across Canada house a kind of irradiation machine that the U.S. government's main scientific advisory body has warned is a prime terrorist target because of its potential use in a "dirty bomb," Canwest

Comments

  1. by avatar uwish
    Thu Feb 28, 2008 10:38 pm
    let me guess there are none of these in the US? so they can have them but we can't?

    NOT

    Sorry buddy worry about your own country and leave the rest of the world to worry about themselves.

    The US gets itself into far too much trouble trying to be the watchdog. Just leave it alone already.

  2. by Kiwigirl
    Fri Feb 29, 2008 7:15 pm
    Did you read the article? The US is replacing theirs and wants Canada to do the same.
    Correct me if I am wrong but it would be pretty tricky to sneak into a hospital and steal one ...

  3. by sasquatch2
    Fri Feb 29, 2008 7:35 pm
    Kiwigirl

    Did you read the article? The US is replacing theirs and wants Canada to do the same.
    Correct me if I am wrong but it would be pretty tricky to sneak into a hospital and steal one ...

    I did and the wording was that these devise were to be replaced by a committee. No action is ongoing.
    Yes tricky is not the word and a fork-lift as well. Radiological detectors are currently proliferating throughout North America.

  4. by Kiwigirl
    Fri Feb 29, 2008 7:37 pm
    War begets war. They gonna ban metal worldwide because that can be used in bombs too? What about gunpowder? Dynamite? Heck they better rescind all gun laws since terrorists could break into houses and steal everyones private gun collections.

  5. by avatar hurley_108
    Fri Feb 29, 2008 8:07 pm
    "Kiwigirl" said
    Did you read the article? The US is replacing theirs and wants Canada to do the same.
    Correct me if I am wrong but it would be pretty tricky to sneak into a hospital and steal one ...


    Who cares about getting it out? Just bring a bomb in and blow it up where it sits.

  6. by sasquatch2
    Fri Feb 29, 2008 9:18 pm
    hurley_108
    Who cares about getting it out? Just bring a bomb in and blow it up where it sits.

    Valid.
    Transporting explosives is easier to conceal than transporting isotopes.
    However a massive bomb would be required to disperse the isotopes beyond the facilitie's room----something on the order of the Oklahoma City bomb----difficult to sneak into a hospital.

  7. by avatar Wada
    Fri Feb 29, 2008 10:28 pm
    Curiouser and curiouser.A microwave oven is probably more useful to a terrorist and yet there are billions of them kicking around with almost noone giving them a second thought.

  8. by cammi_d
    Sat Mar 01, 2008 12:11 am
    Once again AMerica is dictating to other countries what they can and cannot have. How many irradiators are located in America?
    America would be without doubt the most interfering warlike nation in modern history. When was the last time Canada ever upset anyone unless it was following America into some conflict that would only benefit American interests.

  9. by cammi_d
    Sat Mar 01, 2008 12:13 am
    A U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission fact sheet on dirty bombs said most types would not release enough radiation to kill people or cause severe illness and that the conventional explosive itself would be more harmful to people than the radioactive material.

  10. by Gba
    Sat Mar 01, 2008 1:43 am
    Bad news, there's enough bad materials out there to make tons of low-cost, easy-to-acquire dirty bombs. They should get over themselves, or pony up the dough for paying to replace them.



view comments in forum
Page 1

You need to be a member of CKA and be logged into the site, to comment on news.

  • Login
  • Register (free)
 Share  Digg It Bookmark to del.icio.us Share on Facebook


Share on Facebook Submit page to Reddit
CKA About |  Legal |  Advertise |  Sitemap |  Contact   canadian mobile newsMobile

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2025 by Canadaka.net