news Canadian News
Good Morning Guest | login or register
  • Home
    • Canadian News
    • Popular News
    • News Voting Log
    • News Images
  • Forums
    • Recent Topics Scroll
    •  
    • Politics Forums
    • Sports Forums
    • Regional Forums
  • Content
    • Achievements
    • Canadian Content
    • Famous Canadians
    • Famous Quotes
    • Jokes
    • Canadian Maps
  • Photos
    • Picture Gallery
    • Wallpapers
    • Recent Activity
  • About
    • About
    • Contact
    • Link to Us
    • Points
    • Statistics
  • Shop
  • Register
    • Gold Membership
  • Archive
    • Canadian TV
    • Canadian Webcams
    • Groups
    • Links
    • Top 10's
    • Reviews
    • CKA Radio
    • Video
    • Weather

Patriots finish regular season 16-0

Canadian Content
20821news upnews down

Patriots finish regular season 16-0


Sports | 208189 hits | Dec 29 8:22 pm | Posted by: WDHIII
40 Comment

EAST RUTHERFORD, N.J. - With one mighty heave, Tom Brady and Randy Moss took care of the record books. Now it's down to business for the unbeaten New England Patriots: stamping themselves as the greatest team in NFL history.

Comments

  1. by avatar newfette
    Sat Dec 29, 2007 8:35 am
    ok so here's what i dont understand...

    why didn't they play the last minute of the game??

  2. by avatar newfette
    Sun Dec 30, 2007 4:50 am
    :oops: i dont watch a lot of NFL but I was watching a movie (shooter is a fantastic movie)and it was over and i figured 16-0 why the hell not watch the end of the game..

    but it just doesnt make sense.. i mean really a lot can happen in one minute if they were to play. they could have been a turn over and the giants could have scored...

    or was that what they were trying to avoid??

    just seems like a pussy way to end a season i guess

  3. by avatar dog77_1999
    Sun Dec 30, 2007 5:23 am
    "newfette" said
    :oops: i dont watch a lot of NFL but I was watching a movie (shooter is a fantastic movie)and it was over and i figured 16-0 why the hell not watch the end of the game..

    but it just doesnt make sense.. i mean really a lot can happen in one minute if they were to play. they could have been a turn over and the giants could have scored...

    or was that what they were trying to avoid??

    just seems like a pussy way to end a season i guess


    Yes, there is that giant if there. Plus, it is a very common thing to let the clock run down and not shove another touchdown down an opponents throat once you are guarenteed a win.

  4. by avatar Alta_redneck
    Sun Dec 30, 2007 2:36 pm
    They played the last minute, Brady took 3 kneess and i'll have oatmeal and raisin cookies please.

  5. by avatar newfette
    Sun Dec 30, 2007 2:38 pm
    I don't know. just seems wimpy to me..

  6. by avatar Alta_redneck
    Sun Dec 30, 2007 3:04 pm
    "newfette" said
    I don't know. just seems wimpy to me..


    Your forgetting that NY had 59 minutes before the last minute to put up points. If their in a position where their losing, and need the ball, have no more time outs and the winning team has 4 downs to kill the clock. All i can do is relate to an old school yard phrase " tough titties "

    You play to win, you don't play to lose and thats what your doing if you keep passing the ball in that situation.

  7. by avatar Wullu
    Sun Dec 30, 2007 3:09 pm
    Now for a quick hijack!

    newfette is right, Shooter is a hell of a movie! I watched it last night as well.

    I now return you to your regularly scheduled thread ;)

  8. by avatar newfette
    Sun Dec 30, 2007 3:18 pm
    "Alta_redneck" said
    I don't know. just seems wimpy to me..


    Your forgetting that NY had 59 minutes before the last minute to put up points. If their in a position where their losing, and need the ball, have no more time outs and the winning team has 4 downs to kill the clock. All i can do is relate to an old school yard phrase " tough titties "

    You play to win, you don't play to lose and thats what your doing if you keep passing the ball in that situation.

    if you play to win why not go for the final touchdown then?

  9. by avatar Alta_redneck
    Sun Dec 30, 2007 3:27 pm
    "newfette" said
    I don't know. just seems wimpy to me..


    Your forgetting that NY had 59 minutes before the last minute to put up points. If their in a position where their losing, and need the ball, have no more time outs and the winning team has 4 downs to kill the clock. All i can do is relate to an old school yard phrase " tough titties "

    You play to win, you don't play to lose and thats what your doing if you keep passing the ball in that situation.

    if you play to win why not go for the final touchdown then?

    Because they already had the win. They didn't need more points.

    And how many people would have accused the Pats of running up the score if they did?

  10. by avatar newfette
    Sun Dec 30, 2007 3:30 pm
    why shouldn't they run up the score?

    i dont see how that's a bad thing?

  11. by avatar Alta_redneck
    Sun Dec 30, 2007 3:40 pm
    "newfette" said
    why shouldn't they run up the score?

    i dont see how that's a bad thing?


    It�s like playing Russian Roulette, if you�ve pulled the trigger 5 times and your still alive, do you really want to pull it one more time ? That would just show how stupid you were. Not how brave you were.

  12. by avatar newfette
    Sun Dec 30, 2007 3:49 pm
    ok well why don't we compare it to an actualy sport...

    take hockey for example.. a team thats winning schouldn't score on an empty net? would a 6-1 win be considered running up the score?

    isn't the whole point of a game that these men are being played millions to play to score points??

  13. by avatar Alta_redneck
    Sun Dec 30, 2007 4:12 pm
    "newfette" said
    ok well why don't we compare it to an actualy sport...

    take hockey for example.. a team thats winning schouldn't score on an empty net? would a 6-1 win be considered running up the score?

    isn't the whole point of a game that these men are being played millions to play to score points??


    What usually happens in a meaningless hockey game when one team runs up the score ?

  14. by avatar newfette
    Sun Dec 30, 2007 4:15 pm
    exactally a game is meaningless..


    but the game last night wasnt meaningless... all the more reason to play hard for the WHOLE game



view comments in forum
Page 1 2 3

You need to be a member of CKA and be logged into the site, to comment on news.

  • Login
  • Register (free)
 Share  Digg It Bookmark to del.icio.us Share on Facebook


Who voted on this?

  • WDHIII Sat Dec 29, 2007 8:32 pm
  • a2zme Sat Dec 29, 2007 9:31 pm
Share on Facebook Submit page to Reddit
CKA About |  Legal |  Advertise |  Sitemap |  Contact   canadian mobile newsMobile

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2025 by Canadaka.net