 Feds scrapped 100 years of data on climate changeEnvironmental | 207597 hits | Sep 18 12:12 am | Posted by: N_Fiddledog  Canadians already suspicious of Prime Minister Justin Trudeau's carbon tax are likely be even more suspicious given a report by Ottawa-based Blacklock's Reporter that Environment Canada omitted a century's worth of observed weather data in developing its Commentsview comments in forum Page 1 You need to be a member of CKA and be logged into the site, to comment on news. |
Share
|
Mobile
All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2025 by Canadaka.net
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2025 by Canadaka.net
Everywhere is warming faster than everywhere
Omitting observed historical weather data from computer models is common in climate science because of differences in the quality of the reporting of weather data today, compared to 1850 when historical records started being kept.
Also, weather is not climate.
Computer climate models don�t claim to predict what the weather will be like on any given day, month or year.
They predict long-term weather and climate patterns.
Climate scientists test their validity by assessing whether their models predicting future climate patterns can explain climate change patterns in the past, which is based on more data than that provided solely by historical records.
Guess people just didn't read that far.
So the data wasn't 'scrapped', it was re-created to include missing data.
Now the climate alarmist site Skeptical Science tells us that, that is just "quote mining." You know? Kind of like what Doc just did.
Don't mind the practice myself. What quoting isn't quote-mining?
Skeptical science goes on to tell us "we cannot precisely predict the future climate state; however, we can produce a probability distribution of possible future climate states, which is precisely what the IPCC report proceeds to do."
So...even by a climate alarmist site Doc would bend the knee to models can't "precisely predict the future." They can guess possible futures for you.
Is that what Catherine McKenna and Environment Canada made clear on their website? I doubt it.
And why isn't it worth pointing out that high temperatures are nothing new or unusual. Higher temps were happening across Canada for over a century before CM and EC found a small section of the data record they could mine and massage with a model.
It's true weather is not climate but if you're going to create a report suggesting there is something special about the weather we're seeing today perhaps you should clarify that, that's not actually the case.
Oh and one more time. This one's for you, Skeptical Science.
first step in covering up the climate lie, change or 'erase' all previous data, since it clearly does not support your current 'model' of hysteria..
Once again the people who don�t read things to the end completely misunderstand the article. No records were erased. This about what was included or excluded in their new modeling database