news Canadian News
Good Morning Guest | login or register
  • Home
    • Canadian News
    • Popular News
    • News Voting Log
    • News Images
  • Forums
    • Recent Topics Scroll
    •  
    • Politics Forums
    • Sports Forums
    • Regional Forums
  • Content
    • Achievements
    • Canadian Content
    • Famous Canadians
    • Famous Quotes
    • Jokes
    • Canadian Maps
  • Photos
    • Picture Gallery
    • Wallpapers
    • Recent Activity
  • About
    • About
    • Contact
    • Link to Us
    • Points
    • Statistics
  • Shop
  • Register
    • Gold Membership
  • Archive
    • Canadian TV
    • Canadian Webcams
    • Groups
    • Links
    • Top 10's
    • Reviews
    • CKA Radio
    • Video
    • Weather

Liberals propose changes to citizenship oath to

Canadian Content
20765news upnews down
Link Related to Canada in some say

Liberals propose changes to citizenship oath to respect Indigenous rights Social Sharing


Misc CDN | 207654 hits | May 28 1:25 pm | Posted by: N_Fiddledog
30 Comment

The Liberal government is revamping the citizenship oath so that new Canadians make a solemn commitment to respect Indigenous and treaty rights for First Nations, Inuit and M�tis peoples.

Comments

  1. by avatar llama66
    Tue May 28, 2019 8:41 pm
    Its the government's responsibility to recognize and honour treaty rights, not individual citizens. This SJW horseshit is becoming tiresome.

  2. by Thanos
    Tue May 28, 2019 8:48 pm
    At this stage of the game it's time to admit that Trudeau is as much of a maniac as someone like Trump is.

  3. by Dragontail69
    Wed May 29, 2019 1:09 am
    FUCK YOU - No Indigenous rights, abolish them now.

  4. by avatar BeaverFever
    Wed May 29, 2019 2:20 am
    "Dragontail69" said
    FUCK YOU - No Indigenous rights, abolish them now.

    ^ Oh look! It�s the teenage idiot again

  5. by avatar BeaverFever
    Wed May 29, 2019 2:27 am
    "llama66" said
    Its the government's responsibility to recognize and honour treaty rights, not individual citizens. This SJW horseshit is becoming tiresome.


    The new oath doesn�t require citizens to recognize and honour treaty rights.

    Old version: �...I will faithfully observe the laws of Canada and fulfil my duties as a Canadian citizen.�

    New version: � ...I will faithfully observe the laws of Canada, including the Constitution, which recognizes and affirms the Aboriginal and treaty rights of First Nations, Inuit and M�tis peoples, and fulfil my duties as a Canadian citizen."

    Oh the horror.

  6. by avatar raydan
    Wed May 29, 2019 2:32 am
    "BeaverFever" said
    FUCK YOU - No Indigenous rights, abolish them now.

    ^ Oh look! It�s the teenage idiot again
    Every village has one.

  7. by avatar martin14
    Wed May 29, 2019 4:12 am
    "Thanos" said
    At this stage of the game it's time to admit that Trudeau is as much of a maniac as someone like Trump is.



    OK.
    You are right. :lol:

  8. by avatar llama66
    Wed May 29, 2019 4:21 am
    "BeaverFever" said
    Its the government's responsibility to recognize and honour treaty rights, not individual citizens. This SJW horseshit is becoming tiresome.


    The new oath doesn�t require citizens to recognize and honour treaty rights.

    Old version: �...I will faithfully observe the laws of Canada and fulfil my duties as a Canadian citizen.�

    New version: � ...I will faithfully observe the laws of Canada, including the Constitution, which recognizes and affirms the Aboriginal and treaty rights of First Nations, Inuit and M�tis peoples, and fulfil my duties as a Canadian citizen."

    Oh the horror.
    Why change it at all? Why mention it at all? Treaties and rights enforcement are the responsibilities of sovereign nations. It's a waste of time, time that could be spent tackling issues that actually affect Canadians.

  9. by Thanos
    Wed May 29, 2019 4:30 am
    Not too far away from making any non-Native a second-class citizen. Like what it the expectation here, any immigrant encountering a Native is supposed to fall to their knees and start genuflecting due to ethnic superiority and primacy?

    Good thing the details of the article said that the bill is unlikely to pass because it's too close to Parliament ending for the upcoming election. This sort of thing is ridiculously dangerous as to how it can be interpreted, given how insane too many Canadian court decisions and human "rights" tribunal edicts have been for so many years. Hi, Canada, wouldn't you too like to be another merry psycho-ethnostate where rights and obligations are determined by a racial hierarchy?

  10. by avatar martin14
    Wed May 29, 2019 4:38 am
    "llama66" said
    Why change it at all?


    Because the lefties just love their racism, they want it everywhere
    they can get it.

  11. by avatar BeaverFever
    Wed May 29, 2019 4:39 am
    "llama66" said
    Its the government's responsibility to recognize and honour treaty rights, not individual citizens. This SJW horseshit is becoming tiresome.


    The new oath doesn�t require citizens to recognize and honour treaty rights.

    Old version: �...I will faithfully observe the laws of Canada and fulfil my duties as a Canadian citizen.�

    New version: � ...I will faithfully observe the laws of Canada, including the Constitution, which recognizes and affirms the Aboriginal and treaty rights of First Nations, Inuit and M�tis peoples, and fulfil my duties as a Canadian citizen."

    Oh the horror.
    Why change it at all? Why mention it at all? Treaties and rights enforcement are the responsibilities of sovereign nations. It's a waste of time, time that could be spent tackling issues that actually affect Canadians.

    I repeat: The new oath doesn�t require citizens to recognize and honour treaty rights.

    The new oath simply adds the constitution. And then it says the constitution recognizes and affirms the rights of FN. The CONSTITUTION, not the person taking the oath.

    The waste of time argument is itself a waste of time. The old �why are they filling potholes instead of working on World Peace� fallacy. Government is expected to work on many issues at once, some critically important and others not. Besides I doubt this took that much time.

  12. by avatar BeaverFever
    Wed May 29, 2019 4:42 am
    "Thanos" said
    Not too far away from making any non-Native a second-class citizen. Like what it the expectation here, any immigrant encountering a Native is supposed to fall to their knees and start genuflecting due to ethnic superiority and primacy?

    Good thing the details of the article said that the bill is unlikely to pass because it's too close to Parliament ending for the upcoming election. This sort of thing is ridiculously dangerous as to how it can be interpreted, given how insane too many Canadian court decisions and human "rights" tribunal edicts have been for so many years. Hi, Canada, wouldn't you too like to be another merry psycho-ethnostate where rights and obligations are determined by a racial hierarchy?



    Yes those natives have it so good they are so rich and powerful

    God forbid they�re actually acknowledged as existing

    /sarcasm

  13. by avatar Freakinoldguy
    Wed May 29, 2019 5:15 am
    "BeaverFever" said


    I repeat: The new oath doesn�t require citizens to recognize and honour treaty rights.

    The new oath simply adds the constitution. And then it says the constitution recognizes and affirms the rights of FN. The CONSTITUTION, not the person taking the oath.

    The waste of time argument is itself a waste of time. The old �why are they filling potholes instead of working on World Peace� fallacy. Government is expected to work on many issues at once, some critically important and others not. Besides I doubt this took that much time.


    Of course it didn't take much time since they just cherry picked the part of the Constitution that refers to the natives and ignored the rest of it.

    So please explain to me why it was specifically necessary to put "recognizes and affirms the Aboriginal and treaty rights of First Nations, Inuit and M�tis peoples" in the oath instead of "civil rights and liberties of every citizen in Canada, such as freedom of expression, of religion, and of mobility"?

    I'm sorry but this is nothing more than the Liberal party once again playing for votes because everyone else can see it for what it really is. A not so subtle attempt to give the appearance that Native Rights trump all others in the constitution.

  14. by Thanos
    Wed May 29, 2019 5:29 am
    Isn't special status/extra rights based on racial considerations, like, bad or something? :?



view comments in forum
Page 1 2 3

You need to be a member of CKA and be logged into the site, to comment on news.

  • Login
  • Register (free)
 Share  Digg It Bookmark to del.icio.us Share on Facebook


Share on Facebook Submit page to Reddit
CKA About |  Legal |  Advertise |  Sitemap |  Contact   canadian mobile newsMobile

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2025 by Canadaka.net