news Canadian News
Good Afternoon Guest | login or register
  • Home
    • Canadian News
    • Popular News
    • News Voting Log
    • News Images
  • Forums
    • Recent Topics Scroll
    •  
    • Politics Forums
    • Sports Forums
    • Regional Forums
  • Content
    • Achievements
    • Canadian Content
    • Famous Canadians
    • Famous Quotes
    • Jokes
    • Canadian Maps
  • Photos
    • Picture Gallery
    • Wallpapers
    • Recent Activity
  • About
    • About
    • Contact
    • Link to Us
    • Points
    • Statistics
  • Shop
  • Register
    • Gold Membership
  • Archive
    • Canadian TV
    • Canadian Webcams
    • Groups
    • Links
    • Top 10's
    • Reviews
    • CKA Radio
    • Video
    • Weather

CNN sues Trump over Jim Acosta's credential sus

Canadian Content
20698news upnews down

CNN sues Trump over Jim Acosta's credential suspension


Uncle Sam | 206976 hits | Nov 13 10:20 am | Posted by: N_Fiddledog
9 Comment

Jim Acosta had his White House access revoked hours after a confrontation with the president.

Comments

  1. by avatar N_Fiddledog
    Tue Nov 13, 2018 9:13 pm
    If I was the defense attorney and it came time to present the case of the defense I would stand adjusting my tie, nod to the judge, turn to the jury and utter one word.

    "Wah."

    Then sit back down with a smug, proggy smirk on my face.

  2. by avatar BartSimpson  Gold Member
    Tue Nov 13, 2018 9:25 pm
    CNN and the courts have exactly not one right to tell the White House who they can or cannot admit to the grounds. Not even the US Supreme Court has the right to order Jim Acost-her back into the White Hut.

  3. by avatar BeaverFever
    Wed Nov 14, 2018 1:00 am
    "BartSimpson" said
    CNN and the courts have exactly not one right to tell the White House who they can or cannot admit to the grounds. Not even the US Supreme Court has the right to order Jim Acost-her back into the White Hut.


    Not true there�s precedent. Lyndon Johnson revoked a conservative reporter�s press pass and the courts eventually ruled in the reporter�s favour:

    The D.C. circuit court ruled in Sherrill�s favor in 1977. While the court did not demand that the Secret Service issue him a press credential, it did set forth a series of new, transparent steps to ensure that no reporter�s First Amendment rights were violated.
    �Once the government creates the kind of forum that it has created, like the White House briefing room, it can�t selectively include or exclude people on the basis of ideology or viewpoint,� said Ben Wizner, the director of the ACLU�s Speech, Privacy, and Technology Project.

    The new steps enunciated in the Sherrill decision to ensure that reporters� First Amendment rights are not violated include the requirement to give the reporter notice and the right to rebut a formal written decision, which must accompany any revocation. �We further conclude that notice, opportunity to rebut, and a written decision are required because the denial of a pass potentially infringes upon First Amendment guarantees,� the court�s ruling states. �Such impairment of this interest cannot be permitted to occur in the absence of adequate procedural due process.�


    https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/ar ... ss/575479/

  4. by avatar fifeboy
    Wed Nov 14, 2018 1:47 am
    "N_Fiddledog" said
    If I was the defense attorney and it came time to present the case of the defense I would stand adjusting my tie, nod to the judge, turn to the jury and utter one word.

    "Wah."

    Then sit back down with a smug, proggy smirk on my face.

    You mean like you do here?

  5. by avatar herbie
    Wed Nov 14, 2018 3:11 am
    First they came for the journalists, then we have no idea what happened next...

  6. by avatar N_Fiddledog
    Wed Nov 14, 2018 5:55 am
    "fifeboy" said
    If I was the defense attorney and it came time to present the case of the defense I would stand adjusting my tie, nod to the judge, turn to the jury and utter one word.

    "Wah."

    Then sit back down with a smug, proggy smirk on my face.

    You mean like you do here?

    Why? We're you wanting me to use longer sentences? I don't know Fifer. I don't think you're ready for it.

    Or are you seeing me with a smug, proggy smirk-face every time I pin your ears back. :wink:

    To be honest It's me who's not quite ready for that pose yet. Not proggy enough, I guess. I'm working on it though. I have some models.

  7. by avatar N_Fiddledog
    Wed Nov 14, 2018 6:49 am
    As to the previous case that took 11 years to settle before finally receiving an opinion from the DC Court of appeals, there are higher courts than that one.

    So it's still just an argument. We're still just waiting for an opinion then.

    Personally, my opinion is that CNN is crybullying for a crybaby who liked to disrupt press meetings and went "Wah" when he was told he couldn't do it anymore. Hope they lose.

  8. by avatar fifeboy
    Wed Nov 14, 2018 12:23 pm
    "N_Fiddledog" said
    If I was the defense attorney and it came time to present the case of the defense I would stand adjusting my tie, nod to the judge, turn to the jury and utter one word.

    "Wah."

    Then sit back down with a smug, proggy smirk on my face.

    You mean like you do here?

    Why? We're you wanting me to use longer sentences? I don't know Fifer. I don't think you're ready for it.

    Or are you seeing me with a smug, proggy smirk-face every time I pin your ears back. :wink:

    To be honest It's me who's not quite ready for that pose yet. Not proggy enough, I guess. I'm working on it though. I have some models.
    Ooohhh... got me there, you would never look proggy!

  9. by avatar BRAH
    Tue Nov 20, 2018 2:49 am

    ____________

    Fake News!



view comments in forum
Page 1

You need to be a member of CKA and be logged into the site, to comment on news.

  • Login
  • Register (free)
 Share  Digg It Bookmark to del.icio.us Share on Facebook


Share on Facebook Submit page to Reddit
CKA About |  Legal |  Advertise |  Sitemap |  Contact   canadian mobile newsMobile

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2025 by Canadaka.net