news Canadian News
Good Morning Guest | login or register
  • Home
    • Canadian News
    • Popular News
    • News Voting Log
    • News Images
  • Forums
    • Recent Topics Scroll
    •  
    • Politics Forums
    • Sports Forums
    • Regional Forums
  • Content
    • Achievements
    • Canadian Content
    • Famous Canadians
    • Famous Quotes
    • Jokes
    • Canadian Maps
  • Photos
    • Picture Gallery
    • Wallpapers
    • Recent Activity
  • About
    • About
    • Contact
    • Link to Us
    • Points
    • Statistics
  • Shop
  • Register
    • Gold Membership
  • Archive
    • Canadian TV
    • Canadian Webcams
    • Groups
    • Links
    • Top 10's
    • Reviews
    • CKA Radio
    • Video
    • Weather

Supreme Court lets Trump's latest travel ban go

Canadian Content
20704news upnews down

Supreme Court lets Trump's latest travel ban go into full effect


Uncle Sam | 207044 hits | Dec 05 12:40 am | Posted by: N_Fiddledog
8 Comment

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday handed a victory to President Donald Trump by allowing his latest travel ban targeting people from six Muslim-majority countries to go into full effect

Comments

  1. by avatar N_Fiddledog
    Wed Dec 06, 2017 12:07 am
    https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa- ... SKBN1DY2NY

  2. by avatar N_Fiddledog
    Wed Dec 06, 2017 12:10 am
    "WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday handed a victory to President Donald Trump by allowing his latest travel ban targeting people from six Muslim-majority countries to go into full effect even as legal challenges continue in lower courts."

    The nine-member court, with two liberal justices dissenting, granted his administration�s request to lift two injunctions imposed by lower courts that had partially blocked the ban, which is the third version of a contentious policy that Trump first sought to implement a week after taking office in January.

    The high court�s action means that the ban will now go fully into effect for people from Chad, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Syria and Yemen seeking to enter the United States. The Republican president has said the travel ban is needed to protect the United States from terrorism by Islamic militants.

    In a statement, Attorney General Jeff Sessions called the Supreme Court�s action �a substantial victory for the safety and security of the American people.� Sessions said the Trump administration was heartened that a clear majority of the justices �allowed the president�s lawful proclamation protecting our country�s national security to go into full effect.�

  3. by avatar BartSimpson  Gold Member
    Wed Dec 06, 2017 12:15 am
    "N_Fiddledog" said
    "WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday handed a victory to President Donald Trump by allowing his latest travel ban targeting people from six Muslim-majority countries to go into full effect even as legal challenges continue in lower courts."


    I disagree that this is any kind of a victory for Trump. The Constitution and the law clearly delegate this authority to the President so he hasn't won anything he didn't already have.

  4. by avatar xerxes
    Wed Dec 06, 2017 12:36 am
    Considering the last few attempts have been blocked by the courts, it kind of is a victory.

  5. by Thanos
    Wed Dec 06, 2017 12:39 am
    It'll only be any kind of a win for anyone against terrorism when Saudi Arabia is added to the list. Until then the list is a crock, based more on which country does or doesn't have a Trump Hotel in it than on who is producing the most terrorists or financing them. Sorry, I forgot, the US and Saudi are best friends and the Arabs do have that neat glowing orb o'doom to reel in the rubes and all. :roll:

  6. by avatar BartSimpson  Gold Member
    Wed Dec 06, 2017 12:45 am
    "xerxes" said
    Considering the last few attempts have been blocked by the courts, it kind of is a victory.


    Lower courts blocked it.

    Had President Trump gone by the Constitution he could have ignored the lower courts as not having jurisdiction over him (they don't) and then forced the matter to the Supreme Court. I think he was trying to appear to be reasonable all while knowing the certain outcome of the case.

    Note that the question of the case was not about Trump, racism, or etc. but about whether or not the President of the USA (regardless of who it is) holds this authority.

    Seven Justices (including two liberals) correctly held that it does.

    The other two, Ginsburg and Sotomayor, are assholes.

  7. by avatar BartSimpson  Gold Member
    Wed Dec 06, 2017 12:46 am
    "Thanos" said
    It'll only be any kind of a win for anyone against terrorism when Saudi Arabia is added to the list. Until then the list is a crock, based more on which country does or doesn't have a Trump Hotel in it than on who is producing the most terrorists or financing them. Sorry, I forgot, the US and Saudi are best friends and the Arabs do have that neat glowing orb o'doom to reel in the rubes and all. :roll:


    Well...their Prince is currently cleaning house on the radicals so maybe there's hope.

    We'll see.

  8. by Thanos
    Wed Dec 06, 2017 12:51 am
    Nothing like the carrot of selling them a trillion dollars in weaponry to make folks like the Saudis pretend that they're correcting their behaviour. Like a New Age parent in a store telling their brat "well, you only threw three horribly embarrassing tantrums in the last hour since we left the house instead of your usual four tantrums so I guess that means I owe you a toy!". :|



view comments in forum
Page 1

You need to be a member of CKA and be logged into the site, to comment on news.

  • Login
  • Register (free)
 Share  Digg It Bookmark to del.icio.us Share on Facebook


Share on Facebook Submit page to Reddit
CKA About |  Legal |  Advertise |  Sitemap |  Contact   canadian mobile newsMobile

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2025 by Canadaka.net