news Canadian News
Good Evening Guest | login or register
  • Home
    • Canadian News
    • Popular News
    • News Voting Log
    • News Images
  • Forums
    • Recent Topics Scroll
    •  
    • Politics Forums
    • Sports Forums
    • Regional Forums
  • Content
    • Achievements
    • Canadian Content
    • Famous Canadians
    • Famous Quotes
    • Jokes
    • Canadian Maps
  • Photos
    • Picture Gallery
    • Wallpapers
    • Recent Activity
  • About
    • About
    • Contact
    • Link to Us
    • Points
    • Statistics
  • Shop
  • Register
    • Gold Membership
  • Archive
    • Canadian TV
    • Canadian Webcams
    • Groups
    • Links
    • Top 10's
    • Reviews
    • CKA Radio
    • Video
    • Weather

Advertisers look forward to buying your Web bro

Canadian Content
20670news upnews down
Link Related to Canada in some say

Advertisers look forward to buying your Web browsing history from ISPs


Uncle Sam | 206704 hits | Mar 14 11:23 am | Posted by: DrCaleb
5 Comment

Six advertising industry trade groups yesterday thanked Republican lawmakers for introducing legislation that would overturn rules that protect the privacy of Internet users. If the rules are overturned, advertisers would not be prevented from buying cons

Comments

  1. by avatar N_Fiddledog
    Tue Mar 14, 2017 6:47 pm
    The Republican Ars Technica is speaking of is Jeff Flakes.

    Here's his side from his website:

    "Washington, D.C. - U.S. Sen. Jeff Flake (R-Ariz.), chairman of the Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on Privacy, Technology and the Law, today introduced a resolution to repeal economically harmful broadband regulations issued by the Obama administration.

    The resolution would not change or lessen existing consumer privacy regulations. It is intended to block an attempt by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to expand its regulatory jurisdiction and impose prescriptive data restrictions on internet service providers. These restrictions have the potential to negatively impact consumers and the future of internet innovation.

    Flake's resolution would provide for congressional disapproval of the FCC rule under the Congressional Review Act, a 1996 law that empowers Congress to repeal federal regulations. The resolution would also prevent the FCC from issuing similarly harmful regulations in the future.

    'The FCC's midnight regulation does nothing to protect consumer privacy. It is unnecessary, confusing and adds yet another innovation-stifling regulation to the internet,' said Flake. 'My resolution is the first step toward restoring the FTC's light-touch, consumer-friendly approach. It will not change or lessen existing consumer privacy protections. It empowers consumers to make informed choices on if and how their data can be shared.'"


    On March 1, 2017, Flake wrote an op-ed for The Wall Street Journal laying out his argument for the resolution. View the op-ed here"

    http://www.flake.senate.gov/public/inde ... 3971A21061

  2. by avatar N_Fiddledog
    Tue Mar 14, 2017 7:01 pm
    He goes into greater detail at that Wall Street Journal Op Ed.

    Basically Obama wanted the FCC to be in control. So the FCC was given that control in 2015. Flake wants the FTC to get control back.

    So if Americans want to know how truly horrific this change Ars Technica is warning them of is, it would seem all they'd have to do is ask themselves "how bad were things before 2015?"

    It's explained in better detail including the web browser stuff here:

    http://www.flake.senate.gov/public/inde ... 5B31AF4953

  3. by avatar BeaverFever
    Sun Mar 19, 2017 5:15 am
    Just the same right wing pro-corporate, anti-regulation rhetoric. These regulations don't burden consumers, they burden businesses. Republicans don't give a flying shit about people or consumers. It's all about serving their corporate interest paymasters.

    Why would any consumer support LESS regulation of how their personal private data is collected and used,, except for purely partisan ideological reasons?

  4. by avatar DrCaleb
    Mon Mar 20, 2017 1:11 pm
    "BeaverFever" said

    Why would any consumer support LESS regulation of how their personal private data is collected and used,, except for purely partisan ideological reasons?


    And of course, the congratulatory letter from the advertising conglomerate is all about consumers choice, I'm sure.

  5. by avatar DrCaleb
    Mon Mar 20, 2017 2:01 pm
    And a follow up article:

    ISPs that want the federal government to eliminate broadband privacy rules say that your Web browsing and app usage data should not be classified as "sensitive" information.

    "Web browsing and app usage history are not 'sensitive information,'" CTIA said in a filing with the Federal Communications Commission yesterday. CTIA is the main lobbyist group representing mobile broadband providers such as AT&T, Verizon Wireless, T-Mobile USA, and Sprint.

    The FCC rules passed during the Obama administration require ISPs to get opt-in consent from consumers before sharing sensitive customer information with advertisers and other third parties. The FCC defined Web browsing history and app usage history as sensitive information, along with other categories such as geo-location data, financial and health information, and the content of communications. If the rules are overturned, ISPs would be able to sell this kind of customer information to advertisers.


    ISPs say your Web browsing and app usage history isn�t �sensitive�

    If anyone doesn't think your browsing history is 'sensitive', post your unredacted link history and Google Search history below. Because that's the information that's going to be up for sale.



view comments in forum
Page 1

You need to be a member of CKA and be logged into the site, to comment on news.

  • Login
  • Register (free)
 Share  Digg It Bookmark to del.icio.us Share on Facebook


Share on Facebook Submit page to Reddit
CKA About |  Legal |  Advertise |  Sitemap |  Contact   canadian mobile newsMobile

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2025 by Canadaka.net