Posted: Sat Oct 03, 2009 11:15 am
What I don't get is why didn't the guy just write the book? He could possibly have made the 2 mill legitimately.
It sounds pretty bad for the guy the way Letterman presents the case, but what if the guy had said to Letterman I plan to write a book, and I'm notifying you what's going to be in it to give you an opportunity to give your side of the story. What if Letterman then said, I'll give you 2 mill not to write it.
The guy did plead not guilty. I have a suspicion we haven't heard all the details of this story yet.