martin14 martin14:
I did answer the question you stupid old fart, don't be such a dickhead all the time.
$1:
The man faced up to 15-years in prison under Austrian law - but was given a lower sentence apparently due to his young age, and previous good behaviour. The court also took into account the man's 'adverse living conditions' when deciding on the sentence.
The sentence can still be appealed with the man's defence lawyer Roland Kier asking for some time to consider the sentence.
Or rather, next time, just read the fucking article for yourself,
if your glasses are still thick enough.

Good God but you are a nasty piece of work.
My question wasn't: What is the maximum sentence for this crime? It was: What is the normal sentence for this crime?
If he recieved 5 years and most criminals convicted of this get 15, then there is a problem. If not, you may think Austria is too lenient but that is how it rolls there.