|
andyt
CKA Uber
Posts: 33492
Posted: Sat Dec 05, 2015 7:54 pm
Lots of yahoos out there. I can't see it being legal to hunt with bow and arrow, just seems like too small a target to hit.
That said, they should have just euthanized this bird instead of saving it. And a bunch of its brothers and sisters too, where they are pests. All this fussing about animals that aren't endangered I just can't understand.
|
Posts: 42160
Posted: Sat Dec 05, 2015 8:17 pm
Not 100% certain, as provinces vary, but most jurisdictions outlaw the use of crossbows for hunting migratory birds. Longbow and compound bows are acceptable. Some provinces may have exceptions, but it's most likely crossbows are illegal
|
Posts: 15244
Posted: Sun Dec 06, 2015 11:27 am
andyt andyt: That said, they should have just euthanized this bird instead of saving it. And a bunch of its brothers and sisters too, where they are pests. All this fussing about animals that aren't endangered I just can't understand.
This was in rhe wild, not some city street, so it's the humans who are the peats, not the animals. And treating injured animals should be the natural and default response, not something that has to be justified.
|
Posts: 12398
Posted: Sun Dec 06, 2015 12:27 pm
andyt andyt: Lots of yahoos out there. I can't see it being legal to hunt with bow and arrow, just seems like too small a target to hit.
That said, they should have just euthanized this bird instead of saving it. And a bunch of its brothers and sisters too, where they are pests. All this fussing about animals that aren't endangered I just can't understand. It's us, humans, who are the pests.
|
andyt
CKA Uber
Posts: 33492
Posted: Sun Dec 06, 2015 5:35 pm
BeaverFever BeaverFever: andyt andyt: That said, they should have just euthanized this bird instead of saving it. And a bunch of its brothers and sisters too, where they are pests. All this fussing about animals that aren't endangered I just can't understand.
This was in rhe wild, not some city street, so it's the humans who are the peats, not the animals. And treating injured animals should be the natural and default response, not something that has to be justified. No, I disagree. IF the animal is not an endangered species, just euthanize it instead of spending all that time and money rehabbing an animal who may die from predation the day after it is released. As you say, it's the wild, it's not someone's pet.
|
Posts: 15244
Posted: Sun Dec 06, 2015 5:56 pm
andyt andyt: BeaverFever BeaverFever: andyt andyt: That said, they should have just euthanized this bird instead of saving it. And a bunch of its brothers and sisters too, where they are pests. All this fussing about animals that aren't endangered I just can't understand.
This was in rhe wild, not some city street, so it's the humans who are the peats, not the animals. And treating injured animals should be the natural and default response, not something that has to be justified. No, I disagree. IF the animal is not an endangered species, just euthanize it instead of spending all that time and money rehabbing an animal who may die from predation the day after it is released. As you say, it's the wild, it's not someone's pet. Well if it's a human that caused the injury, a human should fix it.
|
andyt
CKA Uber
Posts: 33492
Posted: Sun Dec 06, 2015 6:11 pm
Fix if by euthanizing the animal. Makes no sense we allow people to hunt animals but then get in a fuss when one is injured by humans. Life is tough for animals in the wild. Any particular individual doesn't count in the same way a human does. End its suffering, but leave it at that.
|
Posts: 12398
Posted: Sun Dec 06, 2015 6:33 pm
andyt andyt: Fix if by euthanizing the animal. Makes no sense we allow people to hunt animals but then get in a fuss when one is injured by humans. Life is tough for animals in the wild. Any particular individual doesn't count in the same way a human does. End its suffering, but leave it at that. Who are these individuals that can't count?
|
Posts: 15244
Posted: Mon Dec 07, 2015 9:20 am
PluggyRug PluggyRug: andyt andyt: Fix if by euthanizing the animal. Makes no sense we allow people to hunt animals but then get in a fuss when one is injured by humans. Life is tough for animals in the wild. Any particular individual doesn't count in the same way a human does. End its suffering, but leave it at that. Who are these individuals that can't count? I'll bet none of them are fish, they live in schools.
|
Posts: 65472
Posted: Mon Dec 07, 2015 9:29 am
andyt andyt: Lots of yahoos out there. I can't see it being legal to hunt with bow and arrow, just seems like too small a target to hit.
That said, they should have just euthanized this bird instead of saving it. And a bunch of its brothers and sisters too, where they are pests. All this fussing about animals that aren't endangered I just can't understand. $1: Any society, any nation, is judged on the basis of how it treats its weakest members -- the last, the least, the littlest. ~Cardinal Roger Mahony, In a 1998 letter, Creating a Culture of Life
|
andyt
CKA Uber
Posts: 33492
Posted: Mon Dec 07, 2015 9:30 am
Geese are not members of our society. Maybe spend more effort on taking care of humans.
|
Posts: 65472
Posted: Mon Dec 07, 2015 9:44 am
andyt andyt: Geese are not members of our society. Maybe spend more effort on taking care of humans. If someone is willing to let a poor animal suffer then they won't give two fucks about a person.
|
andyt
CKA Uber
Posts: 33492
Posted: Mon Dec 07, 2015 9:50 am
Putting an animal down is not letting it suffer. Happens every day, should have happened here.
|
Posts: 30422
Posted: Mon Dec 07, 2015 10:54 am
PluggyRug PluggyRug: Who are these individuals that can't count? 
|
|
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 15 posts ] |
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 15 guests |
|
|