CKA Forums
Login 
canadian forums
bottom
 
 
Canadian Forums

Author Topic Options
Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Vancouver Canucks
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 30650
PostPosted: Fri Sep 25, 2015 11:11 pm
 


Title: Animal killer Kayla Bourque to live in New Westminster, warn police
Category: Law & Order
Posted By: Hyack
Date: 2015-09-25 19:35:31
Canadian


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Vancouver Canucks


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 26145
PostPosted: Fri Sep 25, 2015 11:11 pm
 


We'll be hearing from her again.

And apparently, courtesy of the judge, it will be sometime soon.


Offline
CKA Moderator
CKA Moderator
 Vancouver Canucks


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 15594
PostPosted: Fri Sep 25, 2015 11:38 pm
 


Oh yeah... I remember her.

You are probably right, I'm sure we will. Hopefully it won't be at the cost of a life.


Offline
Site Admin
Site Admin
 Vancouver Canucks


GROUP_AVATAR

GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 19986
PostPosted: Sat Sep 26, 2015 10:15 am
 


$1:
Bourque was initially arrested under the Mental Health Act. A search of her residence turned up a blue nylon bag with a kitchen knife, a razor blade, three large garbage bags and a hypodermic needle; a mask was found nearby.

Police also found video clips depicting her killing and hanging the family dog.

In a search warrant for her premises obtained by CBC News, investigators alleged:

Bourque had thoughts of killing a drunk SFU roommate, but decided there'd be too much evidence.
Bourque wanted to get a gun and shoot homeless people.
Bourque persuaded a suicidal boy, online, to kill himself.
Bourque fantasized about killing someone during a home invasion.

Bourque's family told CBC they believed she was ready to take the next step and start killing humans.


Oh well, I guess she'll fit in quite well with some of the many low-lifes already residing here in beautiful New West!!


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 33492
PostPosted: Sat Sep 26, 2015 10:25 am
 


Yes, it's too bad we can't just lock up people for what they might do.


Offline
Site Admin
Site Admin
 Vancouver Canucks


GROUP_AVATAR

GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 19986
PostPosted: Sat Sep 26, 2015 10:35 am
 


andyt andyt:
Yes, it's too bad we can't just lock up people for what they might do.


You really do have a twisted view of Canada's judicial system don't you. This is the 21st century you're living in andy, not the Dark Ages where such actions were common place.


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 33492
PostPosted: Sat Sep 26, 2015 10:37 am
 


Oh!


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Vancouver Canucks


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 26145
PostPosted: Sat Sep 26, 2015 10:54 am
 


I don't know about the label, but if we need one I'd "Minority Report" that particular bitch stat. If it were up to me, I mean.

She'd at least be sent to a mental facility and wouldn't get out until she agreed to stop being nuts. I wouldn't care if that meant never.


Last edited by N_Fiddledog on Sat Sep 26, 2015 10:57 am, edited 1 time in total.

Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 33492
PostPosted: Sat Sep 26, 2015 10:56 am
 


Back to the dark ages for you?


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Vancouver Canucks


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 26145
PostPosted: Sat Sep 26, 2015 10:58 am
 


No. Minority Report takes place in the future. If you need a label, I mean.


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 33492
PostPosted: Sat Sep 26, 2015 11:01 am
 


Sure. But it would be a regression to the dark ages, according to Hyack. And I agree. But then that's what the reactionaries want anyway. Including forelock tugging to the lord and middle ages income inequality, environmental standards, truthiness of church doctrine rather than science...the list goes on.


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Vancouver Canucks


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 26145
PostPosted: Sat Sep 26, 2015 11:07 am
 


andyt andyt:
Sure. But it would be a regression to the dark ages, according to Hyack. And I agree. But then that's what the reactionaries want anyway. Including forelock tugging to the lord and middle ages income inequality, environmental standards, truthiness of church doctrine rather than science...the list goes on.


So, you mean, you agree, then?

That's fine. I disagree. I'd Minority Report the bitch.

Except she could just go to the nut farm (possibly forever). It wouldn't be necessary to have Tom Cruise give her two in the back of the head.

Yeah, I know. Call me a softy.


Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 12 posts ] 



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 26 guests




 
     
All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © Canadaka.net. Powered by © phpBB.