[Public_Domain]

[llama66]

shockedcanadian shockedcanadian:

llama66 llama66:

$1:

Nothing like offending the leader of the free world. Not only did he lose his one on one meeting which might have bore fruit of some kind for his country, but he might find loyalties to his fascism might not be so willing to just go along with his looney tactics for much longer.

Didn't come out and say it, more like inferred it (to me at least)

I haven't inferred the invasion of any nation in my lifetime that I can recall.

sorry then, I read too much into your post.

[BeaverFever]

Imply.

The person making the statement implies.

Inferring is how the listener interprets the statement.

[Thanos]

Public_Domain Public_Domain:

Enabler, sympathizer, apologist....

Just like you with Stalin, Mao, and Pol Pot. Gotta break a few eggs here and there to make that utopian omelet, binky.

[Public_Domain]

[Thanos]

Yet all your little drawings have the symbol on them of the movement and mentality that made all those genocides possible. Odd thing that. Maybe it's time for you to trot out the ol' "that wasn't real communism!" argument for the ten thousandth time to make yourself feel better, as the comfort the genuine and bloodthirsty real-world ideology of a generation of dead murderers from the early 20th century is just too cold to keep anyone warm at night anymore.

[Tricks]

Seems like the people of the country are on board. He used to be a mayor and did this kind of shit on a small scale, and had 90% of the country in favour of him. And they still favour him.


If people want this level of action against criminals in their own country, who are we to say anything about it? We don't know how bad it is, and if this is going to be the only effective way of making things better. Pretty sanctimonious of people to assume they know better than the people who are actually living there.

[BeaverFever]

Yeah and people supported Mussolini and Hitler att first too. Must mean they were good guys

As I said before, he could have passed a last authorizing military or law enforcement to prosecute gangs with aggressive "shoot to kill " rule of engagement. But a president can't just employ death squads athis personal whim and will completely outside the law.

What is it you righties don't understand about democracy, rights the rule of law? This gravitation of right wingers toward despotism is really astounding

[Tricks]

BeaverFever BeaverFever:

Yeah and people supported Mussolini and Hitler att first too. Must mean they were good guys

As I said before, he could have passed a last authorizing military or law enforcement to prosecute gangs with aggressive "shoot to kill " rule of engagement. But a president can't just employ death squads athis personal whim and will completely outside the law.

What is it you righties don't understand about democracy, rights the rule of law? This gravitation of right wingers toward despotism is really astounding

Besides the Godwinning, he isn't targeting certain races or religions. He's cleaning up crime. He's going after the equivalent of Mexican drug cartels. I don't think being soft has ever worked with that type of group.

[Tricks]

At the end of the day, it's a "does the ends justify the means" consideration. If the country improves because of drug dealers/cartels fearing for their lives and they leave or stop doing it, is it worth it?

[martin14]

Only BF can get all butthurt and outraged over the civil rights of drug dealers.


And if he had any brains, (which he doesn't ), he should stop his usual
whining at the big bad righties,

and check out the politics of Duerte.

Might be in for a surprise, especially since all the party is anti Marcos.

[BeaverFever]

Tricks Tricks:

BeaverFever BeaverFever:

Yeah and people supported Mussolini and Hitler att first too. Must mean they were good guys

As I said before, he could have passed a last authorizing military or law enforcement to prosecute gangs with aggressive "shoot to kill " rule of engagement. But a president can't just employ death squads athis personal whim and will completely outside the law.

What is it you righties don't understand about democracy, rights the rule of law? This gravitation of right wingers toward despotism is really astounding

Besides the Godwinning, he isn't targeting certain races or religions. He's cleaning up crime. He's going after the equivalent of Mexican drug cartels. I don't think being soft has ever worked with that type of group.

So what if he's not targeting races?? He's using DEATH SQUADS for fucks sake. Now you're pretending that's a totally normal practice and not using DEATH SQUADS is "soft?!""

Wtf is wrong with you people?

[BeaverFever]

Tricks Tricks:

At the end of the day, it's a "does the ends justify the means" consideration. If the country improves because of drug dealers/cartels fearing for their lives and they leave or stop doing it, is it worth it?

No. You need a civics lesson.

[Tricks]

BeaverFever BeaverFever:

Tricks Tricks:

BeaverFever BeaverFever:

Yeah and people supported Mussolini and Hitler att first too. Must mean they were good guys

As I said before, he could have passed a last authorizing military or law enforcement to prosecute gangs with aggressive "shoot to kill " rule of engagement. But a president can't just employ death squads athis personal whim and will completely outside the law.

What is it you righties don't understand about democracy, rights the rule of law? This gravitation of right wingers toward despotism is really astounding

Besides the Godwinning, he isn't targeting certain races or religions. He's cleaning up crime. He's going after the equivalent of Mexican drug cartels. I don't think being soft has ever worked with that type of group.

So what if he's not targeting races?? He's using DEATH SQUADS for fucks sake. Now you're pretending that's a totally normal practice and not using DEATH SQUADS is "soft?!""

Wtf is wrong with you people?

If soldiers go into a country to round up and kill/imprison terrorists, is it different?

Cause that's what the cartels are, terrorists. Except they're probably responsible for more deaths than terrorists are.

[Tricks]

BeaverFever BeaverFever:

Tricks Tricks:

At the end of the day, it's a "does the ends justify the means" consideration. If the country improves because of drug dealers/cartels fearing for their lives and they leave or stop doing it, is it worth it?

No. You need a civics lesson.

Which is your opinion. One the Filipino people do not share with you from the looks of it.