|
Author |
Topic Options
|
Posts: 65472
Posted: Thu Jan 28, 2016 11:32 am
peck420 peck420: I can honestly say that I didn't expected to get the run down for stating the military is an accessible safe haven for those coming from abusive homes, so a higher incident rate of members coming from abusive homes should be have been expected. For 34 years I've heard plenty of 'helpful observations' that were in truth just passive aggressive insults. While I am sure you meant well I am also sure that the author of this article knew what he wanted to write when he set out to 'research' it.
|
Posts: 11907
Posted: Thu Jan 28, 2016 1:38 pm
This entire thread was started by Andy as a back handed stab at the military. He's repeatedly shown his disdain to every serving member on this site. And Lemmy accidentally showed his true feelings about service members and their inability to get gainful employment in the private sector.
|
andyt
CKA Uber
Posts: 33492
Posted: Thu Jan 28, 2016 6:33 pm
stratos stratos: Well seeing as how Lemmy and andyt feel that certain types of people need to be kept from society even though they have broken no laws and are actually willing to protect their fellow countrymen.
I would conclude that both andyt and Lemmy will not mind being removed from society and cut off from others because, well you know we feel people like them should be kept away from others. Care to provide the quote to back up your bullshit, liar?
|
Posts: 18770
Posted: Fri Jan 29, 2016 11:41 am
andyt andyt: stratos stratos: Well seeing as how Lemmy and andyt feel that certain types of people need to be kept from society even though they have broken no laws and are actually willing to protect their fellow countrymen.
I would conclude that both andyt and Lemmy will not mind being removed from society and cut off from others because, well you know we feel people like them should be kept away from others. Care to provide the quote to back up your bullshit, liar? You've agreed with Lemmy all the way through this thread. Lemmy has clearly stated $1: This is a justification to keep it. We need a place to keep these types. Sort of employed, but not really, housed together on the margins of society, out of most peoples' way, with rigid routine, a strict code of conduct under the watchful eye of supervisors.
Thus sense you have agreed with Lemmy the whole thread and feel that "these" people need to be done per the above. One can only conclude that you would willingly accept the same with no protest if a small segment of society felt you should be treated exactly the same. Thus my original statement. Now Show where there is any bullshit lie outside of your own crap spilling out of your mouth. Because if you are not willing to have the same done to you for the same reason that you support please STFU.
|
andyt
CKA Uber
Posts: 33492
Posted: Fri Jan 29, 2016 6:30 pm
stratos stratos: Well seeing as how Lemmy and andyt feel that certain types of people need to be kept from society even though they have broken no laws and are actually willing to protect their fellow countrymen. Provide the quotes where I said that or agreed with it. Put up or shut up. Liar.
|
Posts: 18770
Posted: Mon Feb 01, 2016 9:05 am
andyt andyt: stratos stratos: Well seeing as how Lemmy and andyt feel that certain types of people need to be kept from society even though they have broken no laws and are actually willing to protect their fellow countrymen. Provide the quotes where I said that or agreed with it. Put up or shut up. Liar. So you do not agree with Lemmy? Odd you've agreed with him on all his other comments here. So here you go put up or shut up yourself. You either agree or disagree with Lemmy. If you agree, like you have with all his other BS, then say so if you don't then how come you have not disagreed with this stance of his while showing support of the rest of his utterances. Your silence on the matter lends credence of support.
|
Posts: 18770
Posted: Mon Feb 01, 2016 9:11 am
andyt andyt: Lemmy Lemmy: andyt andyt: But too bad that the focus of the op has been totally lost here. For my part in that, I apologize. I didn't foresee the backlash my comment would elicit. I should have, but I didn't. Don't worry about it. Martin has it all my fault anyway. You've quickly lent support to Lemmy here with no qualms yet showed no resolve to call him to task on marginalizing people. You will lash out when you disagree, make arguments and even throw names around when you want. Yet here you remained silent till by that silence you were associated with the statement. Now either go cry some more, or make a clear statement against Lemmy's stance on this.
|
andyt
CKA Uber
Posts: 33492
Posted: Mon Feb 01, 2016 9:12 am
Weasel words, liar. Provide a quote in this thread where I agreed with what Lemmy said. That's what this is about, this thread. I'm in no way obligated to comment one way or another on his posts, but you decided to drag me into it. Now put up or shut the fark up, liar.
|
Posts: 11907
Posted: Mon Feb 01, 2016 10:08 am
andyt andyt: Weasel words, liar. Provide a quote in this thread where I agreed with what Lemmy said. That's what this is about, this thread. I'm in no way obligated to comment one way or another on his posts, but you decided to drag me into it. Now put up or shut the fark up, liar. Even when shown that you've lied in other threads you refuse to acknowledge it and tend to double down. You don't have a shred of integrity.
|
Posts: 18770
Posted: Mon Feb 01, 2016 10:23 am
andyt andyt: Weasel words, liar. Provide a quote in this thread where I agreed with what Lemmy said. That's what this is about, this thread. I'm in no way obligated to comment one way or another on his posts, but you decided to drag me into it. Now put up or shut the fark up, liar. Lemmy wrote: andyt wrote: But too bad that the focus of the op has been totally lost here. For my part in that, I apologize. I didn't foresee the backlash my comment would elicit. I should have, but I didn't. Don't worry about it. Martin has it all my fault anyway.
|
Posts: 18770
Posted: Mon Feb 01, 2016 10:25 am
With the above you sided with Lemmy. So shut the fuck up yourself or just come clean and admit you didn't read what Lemmy had said just wanted to take a swipe at Martin and thus got your own ass thrown in with his bullshit. Stop trying to weasel out of siding with Lemmy and his comments.
|
andyt
CKA Uber
Posts: 33492
Posted: Mon Feb 01, 2016 6:30 pm
Wow, are you an idiot. Telling Lemmy not to worry about derailing the thread, because of the slur Martin sent my way is "siding with Lemmy" I guess in idiot world it is. Of course I wanted to take a swipe at Martin - he was being an asshole, but that's not new.
If, as you say, idiot liar, I didn't read what Lemmy wrote, how can I agree with it? Idiot liar.
|
Posts: 18770
Posted: Tue Feb 02, 2016 9:04 am
He was apologizing for derailing the thread with this comment. This comment is what lead myself, Thanos, Martin, and Bart to gasp in horror. Thus the comments that followed $1: End it? This is a justification to keep it. We need a place to keep these types. Sort of employed, but not really, housed together on the margins of society, out of most peoples' way, with rigid routine, a strict code of conduct under the watchful eye of supervisors.
You basically told him it's okay thus aligning yourself with his statement. Read it how you want but that's how I read what you typed if you meant otherwise you have yet to clearly state you are against what Lemmy wrote. All you have done is throw insults while acting all butt hurt for being associated with a comment that you told Lemmy was alright because it was Martin who reacted to it.
|
andyt
CKA Uber
Posts: 33492
Posted: Tue Feb 02, 2016 9:25 am
I guess you don't get it. It's Okay for Lemmy to derail the thread. Since Martin saw it as an attack on my part in the first place, it can't really be derailed according to Martin. IT makes no difference. You decided to take that and twist it just to throw an insult at me for comments I had nothing to do with. You don't like what Lemmy wrote, fine, go after him. There was no need to drag me into it. But then you like to throw my name around in threads I'm not even involved in.
I guess anytime you don't react to a comment on this forum from now on, we can assume you agree with it, since that is your logic. Very McCarthyist of you.
|
Posts: 18770
Posted: Tue Feb 02, 2016 10:05 am
You agreed with Lemmy and his comment that started it all. You can take it from there. You still refuse to even say you do not agree with it. How much more are you going to go on with this. You want to act all butt hurt yet still have not yet come out against what Lemmy said. I've shown you where you've agreed with what he has said. Yet you still won't admit it.
So lets make this really quick and simple do you or do you not agree with lemmy's comment? The comment that started the entire shit storm.
|
|
Page 5 of 6
|
[ 78 posts ] |
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 26 guests |
|
|