OnTheIce OnTheIce:
While I don't at all disagree with the floor crossers, I have a problem with the other two.
Harper cannot leave the Senate empty, hence the appointments. So we all need a partisan reality check.
Secondly, Harper isn't running nor supporting a coalition government. He has a minority government in which other parties have decided to support.
A coalition government is one that signs a formal agreement and gets the approval from the GG to form the official government of Canada once a confidence motion has been defeated. That's not at all the case, as I'm sure you are aware.
And that's the harshest criticism I've ever heard from any of you blue kool-aid drinkers...
"I don't agree with it..." yet when the Liberals do the exact same thing, they are evil incarnate.
I agree, that this government technically isn't a coalition government, but how silly is it that he is cutting deals the the very same people he derided all summer long.
Harper did try and create a coalition. He wrote a letter to GG Clarkson back in the spring of 2005 asking to form a coalition with those dirty socialists if Martin's Liberals lost the budget vote. The only difference between Harper and last fall's coalition is that they took it a step farther.
But the intent was the same.