[Lemmy]

Fiddiddliddiddly Fiddiddliddiddly:

First of all..."raving rant"...that's a little redundant, isn't it Professor? Do you know of another kind of rant?

Just kidding, but for somebody who claimed he was going to "break it down" you don't appear to have heard it, so I don't know what you thought you were going to accomplish.

The 'nothing' we've become accustomed to, I suppose.

Basically what I accused you of was what I called "obvious implication with plausible deniability".

Tell you what. You don't seem able to, as you say, "break it down," so how about I do it (not for you, but for anybody who forgot how it works.)

The way it works is the implication is clearly there, but it's not specifically there. In this way you can do what you just did. Deny it.

Here's how it worked this time.

In the OP a couple of political Progressive types were pretending to be outrageously outraged that Donald Trump had his name on buildings and they were going to do something about it, let me tell you. What exactly? Not much really. Write nasty letters and such, but one gets the implication they'd like to rouse some rabble and be the heroes by leading an Anti-Donald attack from others.

Whatever...fun's fun.

But a few brave posters here made the mistake of noticing what they called "Liberal twat fanbois" or "pansy Liberals".

Oh oh...

This looks like a job for Lemmywinks.

From deep within the Progressive gut there was a stirring. The muffled sound of rapid little padded footprints echoed up the alimentary canal. A little head poked out the anal orifice and chattering bursts of scurrilous, snot and snark repeated into the halls of CKA like little toy rifle fire. Rat-a-tat-tat-tat.

The only far-left Libertarian in existence let the right wing know they were sad and bigoted mouth breathers, and even worse, probably a bunch right wing Sun media readers for daring to challenge the sainted Josh of Progtopia in his call to arms against the dreaded Trump.

So the implication there is Josh of the Left is right, and the real Right is wrong. Which btw is a little curious, because aren't Libertarians supposed to be right wingers?

I know I am, but I'm just a 'cultural Libertarian.' Apparently there's some sort of super special, top secret Canadian Libertarianism that only leftist butt-gerbils know the inner workings of or something.

Oh my god you're a crazy retard. Butt gerbils? What the hell are you on about?

I never commented on the OP. If you re-read my comments, you'll see that all I said was that I supported Josh Matlow in speaking out against racism. I disagreed with OTI's characterization of Matlow's comments as "media whoring." That's all I said. But you can't read, can you? I never said that I supported any measure to take down Trump's signage. You see, dummy, that's what libertarians do: support the right to free expression.

Now a "real" libertarian like yourself would know that that's how it's supposed to work. It's rather like Friedman's dissertation. You've read it, right? He argued that there's no need for regulating physicians. "The market," he hypothesized, "will distinguish the good doctors from the bad." Good doctors will have patients and bad doctors will go out of business. Well, same thing, dipshit. Those who disagree with Trump, like Matlow and myself, get to freely express our opinions. And, if the majority agrees with us, Trump will go out of business and the forces of the market will take down the Trump Tower sign in downtown Toronto.

Never did I say anyone should force Trump to take it down. But, again, you label and put words in peoples' mouths...because you're a crazy person.

[N_Fiddledog]

Deny, deny, deny, you denier . Deny you don't understand what the accusation of you imply then deny means.

Deny I haven't already showed you who Lemmiwinks the South Park butt-Gerbil is. I could show you pictures, but I've already done that.

Here, have some video with song.



It's a brilliant metaphor, because of the way you're lost up the Progressive butt-hole. Also Lemmy with a Y instead of an I. Clever, wot?

And for God sakes if you're going to continue to try to peddle the nonsense of you as any kind of Libertarian, learn of the existence of somebody in the movement besides "Small L libertarian, Large C conservative" Milton Friedman.

First off, you're nothing like him. There's no there there.

[Lemmy]

So no "Sorry, Lemmy, for mischaracterizing your position and putting words in your mouth wrongly"? No manning-up, eh? Just a double-down on the insults. Check.

[N_Fiddledog]

Nope. It's double-down on truth.

Imply so it can be later denied is a Prog trick of support without culpability. They imply a campaign. You support it by attacking critics.

And counter-attack is not attack.

[OnTheIce]

N_Fiddledog N_Fiddledog:

Nope. It's double-down on truth.

Imply so it can be later denied is a Prog trick of support without culpability. They imply a campaign. You support it by attacking critics.

And counter-attack is not attack.

Sounds about right.

Praise the words of the politician, slam those that don't and then claim you don't support what the politician said.

[Lemmy]

N_Fiddledog N_Fiddledog:

Imply so it can be later denied is a Prog trick of support without culpability. They imply a campaign. You support it by attacking critics.

I'm not going argue whether any of that's true or not. I'll give you the benefit of the doubt and, for the moment, presume you're right. So what? I didn't attack any critics. I never said whether I agreed nor disagreed with Matlow. The only person I criticized was OTI in his claim that Matlow, in making this Trump-business an issue, was because Matlow was a "media whore". Jesus, you need to learn to read. The leap between me agreeing that Trump is bigot and me defending the notion he must remove the sign on his building to appease Trump-scorn was purely cooked-up in your miswired brain. More putting words in people's mouths so they fit your simple labels. Wow, you're dense.

Diddler Diddler:

And counter-attack is not attack.

And what is it when there isn't an attack at all?

[Lemmy]

OnTheIce OnTheIce:

Praise the words of the politician, slam those that don't and then claim you don't support what the politician said.

No, praise the sentiment of the politician (that Trump is an embarassing bigot) and his right to express that opinion without pinheads like you accusing him of being a "media whore". Never slammed any opposing view, only the notion that the original view was "media whoring", don't support what the politician said because it's no one's business but Trump's whether he puts his name on his building.

[N_Fiddledog]

Here ya go Lemmy. Here's what an actual, for real, Libertarian (Stefan Molyneux) sounds like. Now you know of two. But this one's current.

You're welcome.

[OnTheIce]

Lemmy Lemmy:

OnTheIce OnTheIce:

Praise the words of the politician, slam those that don't and then claim you don't support what the politician said.

No, praise the sentiment of the politician (that Trump is an embarassing bigot) and his right to express that opinion without pinheads like you accusing him of being a "media whore". Never slammed any opposing view, only the notion that the original view was "media whoring", don't support what the politician said because it's no one's business but Trump's whether he puts his name on his building.

Ah yes, the "sentiment".

Never slammed an opposing view beyond your typical name calling.

[Lemmy]

I guess I deserve this for arguing with delusional people.

[N_Fiddledog]

Lemmy Lemmy:

ROTFL I guess I deserve this for arguing with delusional people.

You're a fraud Lemmy and all you've got is snark, snot and insults.

See the way that works? Attack then counter-attack. Don't start it and you won't require others to finish it.

[Lemmy]

More craziness. Keep raving.

[N_Fiddledog]

Lemmy Lemmy:

More craziness. Keep raving.

More butt-gerbil, fraud talk from the land of fantasy think where disagreement with the groupthink is considered insanity.

Amongst you lunatics in the asylum we guards are the nuts. Inside is outside and outside is in.

[desertdude]

Lemmy Lemmy:

ROTFL I guess I deserve this for arguing with delusional people.

Pretty much, you keep feeding this little troll dog and hell keep on barking shit, because thats all he does.

As they say, never argue with an idiot.......................

[N_Fiddledog]

desertdude desertdude:

Lemmy Lemmy:

ROTFL I guess I deserve this for arguing with delusional people.

Pretty much, you keep feeding this little troll dog and hell keep on barking shit, because thats all he does.

As they say, never argue with an idiot.......................

Troll-boy calling people trolls. That's rich.

Go back to cultural jihadi class, boy. Your skills need work.

So if you actually believe arguing with an idiot makes you an idiot, and you're calling me an one, what are you doing here? Idiot.

You two are so out of it you believe you.