CKA Forums
Login 
canadian forums
bottom
 
 
Canadian Forums

Author Topic Options
Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 33492
PostPosted: Thu May 24, 2012 11:58 am
 


DrCaleb DrCaleb:

You can't prove me wrong as I have made a point of never saying anything like 'you are ____'. Always 'that is ____'. If I find myslef approaching the 'Dark Side' I delete the comment I was making and come back in a hour. If you can prove me wrong, I'll happily apoligise, as I never ever mean to personally insult anyone. (Spammers not included)

It's not my responsibility how you percieve my comments, it's just my own self respect that guides me to never break the 'ad hominem' rule of debate. It's never personal.

OTI could simply adopt the same attitude, and not take offense where Martin offered none. Rebutting Martin's opinion is easy after that, as no one has been convicted of murder in the Dzienkanski incident, so no one is a 'murderer'. Incorrect adjective. Did they get away with murder? That's a matter of opinion. ;)



That is such bullshit.

Actually, good post Caleb. I will endeavor to model myself after what you have described.


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Toronto Maple Leafs


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 12398
PostPosted: Thu May 24, 2012 12:01 pm
 


andyt andyt:
In that case, it would be nice if we had an insult meter that raised a flag when the first one was hurled in a thread.


No one throws insults around on this board, so STFU and mind your own business.


Offline
CKA Moderator
CKA Moderator
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 53244
PostPosted: Thu May 24, 2012 12:02 pm
 


OnTheIce OnTheIce:
DrCaleb DrCaleb:
OTI could simply adopt the same attitude, and not take offense where Martin offered none. Rebutting Martin's opinion is easy after that, as no one has been convicted of murder in the Dzienkanski incident, so no one is a 'murderer'. Incorrect adjective. Did they get away with murder? That's a matter of opinion. ;)


When someone makes a stupid remark about a friend of yours and calls him a murderer, we'll see how warm and fuzzy you are.


Won't make a difference to me, because as I say; I don't take it personally. I know my friends are not murderers, and feel no need to defend them from some black dots on my computer screen.


Offline
CKA Moderator
CKA Moderator
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 53244
PostPosted: Thu May 24, 2012 12:03 pm
 


andyt andyt:
DrCaleb DrCaleb:

You can't prove me wrong as I have made a point of never saying anything like 'you are ____'. Always 'that is ____'. If I find myslef approaching the 'Dark Side' I delete the comment I was making and come back in a hour. If you can prove me wrong, I'll happily apoligise, as I never ever mean to personally insult anyone. (Spammers not included)

It's not my responsibility how you percieve my comments, it's just my own self respect that guides me to never break the 'ad hominem' rule of debate. It's never personal.

OTI could simply adopt the same attitude, and not take offense where Martin offered none. Rebutting Martin's opinion is easy after that, as no one has been convicted of murder in the Dzienkanski incident, so no one is a 'murderer'. Incorrect adjective. Did they get away with murder? That's a matter of opinion. ;)



That is such bullshit.

Actually, good post Caleb. I will endeavor to model myself after what you have described.



LOL R=UP


Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 49 posts ]  Previous  1  2  3  4



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 27 guests




 
     
All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © Canadaka.net. Powered by © phpBB.