[stratos]

Tricks Tricks:

stratos stratos:

To even further the moral high ground how can you justify taking someone else's money / property when the have commited no breach of the law.

Where did I say I supported taking their assets?


I'll wait.

By implying that the billionaire did not have the moral high ground to keep their money. You implied with the seizure of said money over 999,999,999.99 which is what we are discussing.

[Tricks]

Serious question, when you hear the story of Robin Hood, do you side with the Sheriff of Nottingham?

[Tricks]

stratos stratos:

Tricks Tricks:

stratos stratos:

To even further the moral high ground how can you justify taking someone else's money / property when the have commited no breach of the law.

Where did I say I supported taking their assets?


I'll wait.

By implying that the billionaire did not have the moral high ground to keep their money. You implied with the seizure of said money over 999,999,999.99 which is what we are discussing.

Nonsense, if I didn't write it, I didn't imply it. I asked a philosophical question as to whether what can be argued as theft within in the law is morally equivalent to theft outside the law.

As Bart says:

$1:

I am responsible for what I said, not for what you think I said. - Bart Simpson

[stratos]

Fairy tail told to illicit feelings vs the bellow real life events.

When you here of theft to you side with the thief?

When someone demands you hand over your money because you have more than they do, do you hand it over.

[BartSimpson]

Tricks Tricks:

Serious question, when you hear the story of Robin Hood, do you side with the Sheriff of Nottingham?

I do. The Sheriff got all the chicks.

[Tricks]

BartSimpson BartSimpson:

Tricks Tricks:

Serious question, when you hear the story of Robin Hood, do you side with the Sheriff of Nottingham?

I do. The Sheriff got all the chicks.

Except one

[Tricks]

stratos stratos:

Fairy tail told to illicit feelings vs the bellow real life events.

When you here of theft to you side with the thief?

When someone demands you hand over your money because you have more than they do, do you hand it over.

Of course not. But I'm also not immoral piece of shit.

[herbie]

When Caesar demands your money, you hand it over.
Democracy only lets you elect Caesar.
WTF does it have to do with these nut cases in BC anyway?

[DrCaleb]

herbie herbie:

When Caesar demands your money, you hand it over.
Democracy only lets you elect Caesar.

Caesar paid his $300k to join the party and convinced other like minded folk to give him millions to campaign, why shouldn't you vote for him? After all, democracy means anyone could run for office, just like him. He is of the people!

herbie herbie:

WTF does it have to do with these nut cases in BC anyway?

Just a moralistic argument if it's acceptable to steal from the thief the stuff he stole from others. Like Google and Facebook stealing my data and selling it to make billions; is it then morally OK for me to demand they pay me for that data or should I just support extra taxes on their income that really goes into Caesars' re-election fund.

[stratos]

DrCaleb DrCaleb:

herbie herbie:

When Caesar demands your money, you hand it over.
Democracy only lets you elect Caesar.

Caesar paid his $300k to join the party and convinced other like minded folk to give him millions to campaign, why shouldn't you vote for him? After all, democracy means anyone could run for office, just like him. He is of the people!

herbie herbie:

WTF does it have to do with these nut cases in BC anyway?

Just a moralistic argument if it's acceptable to steal from the thief the stuff he stole from others. Like Google and Facebook stealing my data and selling it to make billions; is it then morally OK for me to demand they pay me for that data or should I just support extra taxes on their income that really goes into Caesars' re-election fund.

IT is NOT the same thing. You and so many claim that the billionaire stole the money. Okay take them to court and prove it. Throw their ass in jail. Yet you don't support that because you know they did not brake the law. So you claim moral high ground gives you the right to take the money from them because why? Oh because you don't have as much money as then.

[DrCaleb]

stratos stratos:

DrCaleb DrCaleb:

herbie herbie:

When Caesar demands your money, you hand it over.
Democracy only lets you elect Caesar.

Caesar paid his $300k to join the party and convinced other like minded folk to give him millions to campaign, why shouldn't you vote for him? After all, democracy means anyone could run for office, just like him. He is of the people!

herbie herbie:

WTF does it have to do with these nut cases in BC anyway?

Just a moralistic argument if it's acceptable to steal from the thief the stuff he stole from others. Like Google and Facebook stealing my data and selling it to make billions; is it then morally OK for me to demand they pay me for that data or should I just support extra taxes on their income that really goes into Caesars' re-election fund.

IT is NOT the same thing. You and so many claim that the billionaire stole the money. Okay take them to court and prove it. Throw their ass in jail. Yet you don't support that because you know they did not brake the law. So you claim moral high ground gives you the right to take the money from them because why? Oh because you don't have as much money as then.

Where did I say I supported taking their assets?


I'll wait.

[llama66]

BartSimpson BartSimpson:

DrCaleb DrCaleb:

BartSimpson BartSimpson:

Another bunch of leftist fuckstains who masturbate to fantasies of gulags and 're-education' camps for their political enemies.

Funny how none of those things are in their platform, yet you choose to invent them anyhow.

Their own words speak to seizing all private property (homes, businesses, land, and farms), forcibly ending capitalism, and nationalizing all resources.

Those things will not be accomplished without paroxysms of blood and violence.

They never have been.

None of what they propose is even remotely legal or constitutional. Some government thief comes for my shit... It'll be a bad day for them

[stratos]

$1:

Where did I say I supported taking their assets?I'll wait.

Because this all started with me pointing out that this new party wanting to take any billionaires money over 999,999,999.99 is theft.

From that point forward everyone is trying to change the bar and arguing moral right to do something that they claim is wrong.

You seem to be siding with them. Sorry if I miss interpreting what you are trying to say.

[stratos]

Tricks Tricks:

stratos stratos:

Fairy tail told to illicit feelings vs the bellow real life events.

When you here of theft to you side with the thief?

When someone demands you hand over your money because you have more than they do, do you hand it over.

Of course not. But I'm also not immoral piece of shit.

But you seem to be fine with the Gov. arbitrarily taking the money from someone. Only because they have more than you do so you are fine with it.

Theft is okay in your mind when it is being done to someone you don't like? Real moral high ground you claim to be standing on.

[Freakinoldguy]

Tricks Tricks:

BartSimpson BartSimpson:

Tricks Tricks:

Serious question, when you hear the story of Robin Hood, do you side with the Sheriff of Nottingham?

I do. The Sheriff got all the chicks.

Except one

So you're saying that with Robin Hood it was quality over quantity?