CKA Forums
Login 
canadian forums
bottom
 
 
Canadian Forums

Author Topic Options
Offline
CKA Super Elite
CKA Super Elite
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 8738
PostPosted: Mon Oct 18, 2010 11:42 am
 


ASLplease ASLplease:
we are still wasting money on a duckgun registry, and its the liberals fault



Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 23084
PostPosted: Mon Oct 18, 2010 12:57 pm
 


ASLplease ASLplease:
wow, you misread my post and erupted, I didnt say 1 billion in 2003, I said in 2003, the estimate to reach a specific milestone ie 'acurate' would cost another 1 billion LIBERAL dollars, so you better multiply that by 1000 to get a real number.


It's hard to believe some people are so thick. Yes, the Liberals estimated in 2003 that it would cost up to a Billion dollars to set-up the registry, but that was an initial cost, not an annual expense.

$1:
The report found that the Canadian Firearms Program is operating efficiently at a cost of $1.1 million to $3.6 million per year


http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/08/26/rcmp ... efficient/

$1:
It would, however, save the $4-million annual cost of running the long-gun registry.


http://www.thebarrieexaminer.com/Articl ... ?e=2727257

Like I said, a Conservative lie maintained by hacks like you...


Offline
CKA Elite
CKA Elite
Profile
Posts: 4183
PostPosted: Mon Oct 18, 2010 1:48 pm
 


ROTFL In 2003, there had already been 1 billion spent on the registry, and the estimate was for how much more was needed.


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 23084
PostPosted: Mon Oct 18, 2010 1:49 pm
 


Yeah, sorry. I forgot facts never were your strong suit...


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 23084
PostPosted: Mon Oct 18, 2010 1:58 pm
 


Proculation Proculation:
The astronomical conservative deficits are not the gun registry fault. The conservative spent like crazy in a 'stimulus program' while he should have cut its spending and taxes. That's the reason.

The problem is that with the liberals, it would have been the same thing or worse. So we are screwed.


I agree the results would have been similar, if not the same, but the spending priorities would have been different.

For example, EI and the social programs (like their proposed home care plan for $1 billion) would have gotten more money under the Liberals, while corporate tax cuts wouldn't have gotten as much. The Liberals also wouldn't be promising to spend around $16 billion on new fighters until the economy turned around (then they'd spend $10 billion on less effective ones - maybe even 2nd hand ones... :D J/K). By itself, the fighter purchase isn't that much, but coupled with new transport planes and helicopters, it's a rather large sum. And they still haven't thought about replacing our 40 year destroyers either...

I think defence spending in a recession is fine, but I think the Liberals would also have been far more willing than the Conservatives to spend it at home (like on Buffaloes from Viking Air instead of Spartans from Italy - as the Conservatives are expected to). After all their track record (Iltis, LAVs, Griffons, Halifax FFHs, etc - a mixed record admittedly) shows that whenever possible, they bought from domestic manufacturers instead of foreign ones (or forced foreign companies to do some assembly here). It might have rankled the military, but even the Conservatives understand the benefits of spending defence dollars here in Canada instead of abroad.


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Vancouver Canucks
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 30650
PostPosted: Mon Oct 18, 2010 2:11 pm
 


Title: Liberals attack Flaherty on economic record
Category: Political
Posted By: Curtman
Date: 2010-10-18 14:07:49
Canadian





PostPosted: Mon Oct 18, 2010 2:11 pm
 


$1:
The Liberals would get Canada's deficit down to one per cent of GDP within two fiscal years, Goodale pledged. Under the most recent Liberal governments, Canada's debt ratio was cut by more than half, he noted.

A major way of achieving that, he said, would be to cancel government plans to give corporations another 20 per cent tax cut, when the base corporate tax rate is already the second-lowest among the G7 countries.

The $6 billion in revenue that would have been lost because of the tax cut would then be earmarked for deficit and debt reduction, he said.


Yay! Campaign promises means a campaign soon. :)


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Boston Bruins


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 11907
PostPosted: Mon Oct 18, 2010 2:16 pm
 


Curtman Curtman:
$1:
The Liberals would get Canada's deficit down to one per cent of GDP within two fiscal years, Goodale pledged. Under the most recent Liberal governments, Canada's debt ratio was cut by more than half, he noted.

A major way of achieving that, he said, would be to cancel government plans to give corporations another 20 per cent tax cut, when the base corporate tax rate is already the second-lowest among the G7 countries.

The $6 billion in revenue that would have been lost because of the tax cut would then be earmarked for deficit and debt reduction, he said.


Yay! Campaign promises means a campaign soon. :)


Which would mean either another Conservative minority, or a Conservative majority. either way Iggy and company will still be on the outside looking in! Maybe it's time for the Liberals to have another leadership race. 8)





PostPosted: Mon Oct 18, 2010 2:20 pm
 


2Cdo 2Cdo:
Which would mean either another Conservative minority, or a Conservative majority. either way Iggy and company will still be on the outside looking in! Maybe it's time for the Liberals to have another leadership race. 8)



Coalition time!!!!!


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 23084
PostPosted: Mon Oct 18, 2010 2:23 pm
 


There's already a thread on this;

current-events-f59/liberals-ready-to-rip-into-harper-government-s-mid-year-econ-t92304.html


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Toronto Maple Leafs


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 12398
PostPosted: Mon Oct 18, 2010 2:24 pm
 


Curtman Curtman:

Yay! Campaign promises means a campaign soon. :)



Campaign promises are like buckets with no bottom or sides.

Unfortunately the Liberals don't have a bucket er leader.

1% of GDP in two years, give me a break, until the US economy recovers, Canada will also remain in the doldrums.


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Boston Bruins


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 11907
PostPosted: Mon Oct 18, 2010 2:25 pm
 


Curtman Curtman:
2Cdo 2Cdo:
Which would mean either another Conservative minority, or a Conservative majority. either way Iggy and company will still be on the outside looking in! Maybe it's time for the Liberals to have another leadership race. 8)



Coalition time!!!!!



ROTFL

Oh, you were serious.

ROTFL





PostPosted: Mon Oct 18, 2010 2:34 pm
 


2Cdo 2Cdo:
Oh, you were serious.


Why not? The Reform/Alliance/Conservative coalition can't claim it was a sneak attack a second time. It's no less democratic than prorogue.


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Boston Bruins


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 11907
PostPosted: Mon Oct 18, 2010 2:40 pm
 


These days the NDP and the Bloc don't want to tie their fortunes to the Liberal ship. The only people who seem to really like the idea of a coalition are Liberal supporters. If the Liberals truly want to get back into power they really need a better leader with a clear plan. Martin, Dion and now Iggy have been duds for the Liberals.





PostPosted: Mon Oct 18, 2010 2:44 pm
 


2Cdo 2Cdo:
These days the NDP and the Bloc don't want to tie their fortunes to the Liberal ship. The only people who seem to really like the idea of a coalition are Liberal supporters. If the Liberals truly want to get back into power they really need a better leader with a clear plan. Martin, Dion and now Iggy have been duds for the Liberals.


The NDP has no chance at forming a government without the Liberals. The Bloc are Conservatives, they have no place in a Lib/NDP coalition, unless they choose to support it again.


Post new topic  This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 70 posts ]  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  Next



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 15 guests




 
     
All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © Canadaka.net. Powered by © phpBB.