ShepherdsDog ShepherdsDog:
Thanos Thanos:
Nope, that's a sucker bet because the Dems are now just a three-legged nag fit only for being turned into glue. They and they alone are capable of losing to the type of criminal scunge that builds up around the base of poorly-cleaned toilets that practically anyone else in the entire universe is capable of beating.
And he isn't as bad as we think him to be. He's as legitimately bad as he's proving himself to be, each and every day.
It's only because the Democrats are so sucky at picking candidates that a PoS like Trump got in. But the simple-minded fuck thinks that because we find Trump so repellent, that you must be a fan of the Democrats or Clintons simply by not liking Trump. That line of thought(to use it in the loosest form possible), would have all Allied vets of WW2 labeled communists because they only killed fascists.
Martin's already played this card with me. I've been saying what a mediocrity Clinton is since Obama beat her for the nomination back in 2008. And that the only good thing about her is that she's somewhat (not much though) less repulsive in character than Donald Trump. And that the only reason she got the chance in 2016 was from gaming the race in her own benefit and because the party thought it owed her for sticking around for so goddamn long, just like the Liberals did with an embarrassment like Jean Chretien. Run it past the current thinking though on the right and it gets strawman-ed and gaslit into some sort of fucked up 4Chan/Reddit/Rebel bit of mental sewage of "oh, that means you're really a Democrat and you support the Clintons".
It's fucking idiotic but that's what the internet age has done to these types of discussions. Fucking absolutist fanatics with about as much subtlety to any of their positions or beliefs as a flying mallet strike directly to the genitals. Some of them just can't help being as obtuse as possible.