[bootlegga]

OnTheIce OnTheIce:

bootlegga bootlegga:

Lots of Trudeau Derangement Syndrome here on CKA...

Lots of deflecting here on CKA from you and the Left.

Funny, if this was Harper you'd be all over it. Instead, those pointing out another broken promise are deranged?

If you want to point out broken promises, that's one thing (and boy, did Harper ever have a lot of those).

But when you start posting things like PM Fucknuts and calling the PM Justine, it's crossed over into TDS. Frankly, it just makes people posting that look just as stupid as the hard line lefties did when they freaked out about Harper.

[herbie]

BartSimpson BartSimpson:

Revenue not received is not a "cost".

Geez, I LOATHE these fuckers who twist the language around.

Of course it is. That\s why the bank I used to deal with chrges 2.75% to deposit cash. It COSTS them to have employees DO something.
Trying to figure out how handing them cheques doesn't when they always tally them up and double-check those

[BartSimpson]

herbie herbie:

BartSimpson BartSimpson:

Revenue not received is not a "cost".

Geez, I LOATHE these fuckers who twist the language around.

Of course it is. That\s why the bank I used to deal with chrges 2.75% to deposit cash. It COSTS them to have employees DO something.
Trying to figure out how handing them cheques doesn't when they always tally them up and double-check those

So if you leave that bank and they lose the revenue from your deposits then that's an expense for them?

[BartSimpson]

Take that a step further:

If a reduction in revenue is a cost then when a multinational corporation see their revenue slide from $150 billion to $140 billion then they should be able to write off the $10 billion they didn't earn as an expense, right?

[OnTheIce]

BartSimpson BartSimpson:

Revenue not received is not a "cost".

Geez, I LOATHE these fuckers who twist the language around.

This is how the Left thinks.

The money I take home is just the money the government allows me to take home. I should be grateful.

[Freakinoldguy]

BeaverFever BeaverFever:

So do the right-wingers on this site want the tax cut or not? Can you please clarify? They'll take it, but not from Justin?

For the record, I'm against it.

Martin, you never answered my question regarding "Justine": What's your problem with women anyway, that you think calling him a woman's name should be a degrading insult?

The only "middle class" tax cut will be for people who aren't statistically middle class and the well off semi rich which makes the campaign promise just another joke. So you're right to be against it because it isn't going to benefit the people who need it the most but, for some odd reason it's going to benefit the people who need it the least.

$1:

But strangely, Trudeau’s “middle class” tax cut doesn’t much benefit the middle class. The biggest tax cut goes to people earning $89,000 to $200,000.

And if those incomes don’t sound very middle class, it’s because, statistically, they’re not.

$1:

The Liberals plan to lower the tax rate on each dollar taxed in the second bracket, which ranges from $45,000 to $89,000. So someone earning $45,000 or less, who has no income taxed in that bracket, gets no tax cut. Someone at the top of the bracket – earning $89,000 – has $44,000 of income taxed in that bracket and gets the biggest tax cut.

But also, people in even higher tax brackets – earning $150,000, $200,000, $500,000 or higher – also have $44,000 of income taxed in the second bracket. These elite earners also get the maximum tax cut. However, with a proposed surtax on income over $200,000, the tax cut is fully clawed back at about $212,000.

http://www.torontosun.com/2015/12/06/mi ... it-appears

What a great system of giving the middle class a break especially considering that a considerable amount of middle class earners are below Mr. Trudeau's magic 45K mark.


Oh to be the Liberal definition of middle class, what a life.

[BeaverFever]

BartSimpson BartSimpson:

herbie herbie:

BartSimpson BartSimpson:

Revenue not received is not a "cost".

Geez, I LOATHE these fuckers who twist the language around.

Of course it is. That\s why the bank I used to deal with chrges 2.75% to deposit cash. It COSTS them to have employees DO something.
Trying to figure out how handing them cheques doesn't when they always tally them up and double-check those

So if you leave that bank and they lose the revenue from your deposits then that's an expense for them?

Yes lost business is called a loss.

[BeaverFever]

OnTheIce OnTheIce:

BartSimpson BartSimpson:

Revenue not received is not a "cost".

Geez, I LOATHE these fuckers who twist the language around.

This is how the Left thinks.

Its how business thiks too. It's how you would think if your employer wanted to reduce your salary.

[BeaverFever]

BartSimpson BartSimpson:

Take that a step further:

If a reduction in revenue is a cost then when a multinational corporation see their revenue slide from $150 billion to $140 billion then they should be able to write off the $10 billion they didn't earn as an expense, right?

Sometimes they can, depends on the specifics, but if they are purposely planning to reduce their revenue, say as part of a long term strategy, then you bet their accountants have to book that loss in revenue and so planned investments may have to be scaled back as a result.

[herbie]

So I'm living the "cost" in retirement... if only I'd grossly overcharged my customers I'd be much better off?

[OnTheIce]

BeaverFever BeaverFever:

Its how business thiks too. It's how you would think if your employer wanted to reduce your salary.

Clearly, your business experience is limited.

Revenue not received isn't a loss unless you expect that everyone is supposed to shop at your particular business.

[uwish]

BeaverFever BeaverFever:

I have no problem with the increase on the $200,000-aires. I just don't like the cuts.

Harper, Martin and Chretien all cut personal, corporate, and sales taxes substantially.

How do you balance the budget with continual tax cuts year after year after year? Enough. If they just stop cutting for a while and let the budget balance, THEN they can revisit the topic but otherwise its a fool's game.

that is complete and utter BS. It's just tax re-assignment, what the feds give the provinces take away. Alberta case in point. I can go back to my tax records over the past 15 years, my tax bill has NOT gotten any smaller..ever.

[andyt]

That doesn't mean that they didn't cut taxes, which reduces govt of Canada revenue. If Alberta, with it's wasteful ways just raised taxes in lieu, that's their problem. In BC the govt also cut taxes starting in 2001. The claim is that BC has the lowest income taxes of any province for people earning under 122,000. Of course they made it up with all sorts of user fees etc, so it hits the low income people the hardest. Not too brilliant either.

[BartSimpson]

BeaverFever BeaverFever:

BartSimpson BartSimpson:

So if you leave that bank and they lose the revenue from your deposits then that's an expense for them?

Yes lost business is called a loss.

Then when a company like Wal Mart sees revenues in Canada slide due to the receding economy you're okay with them deducting that corresponding amount from their taxes?

[BeaverFever]

uwish uwish:

BeaverFever BeaverFever:

I have no problem with the increase on the $200,000-aires. I just don't like the cuts.

Harper, Martin and Chretien all cut personal, corporate, and sales taxes substantially.

How do you balance the budget with continual tax cuts year after year after year? Enough. If they just stop cutting for a while and let the budget balance, THEN they can revisit the topic but otherwise its a fool's game.

that is complete and utter BS. It's just tax re-assignment, what the feds give the provinces take away. Alberta case in point. I can go back to my tax records over the past 15 years, my tax bill has NOT gotten any smaller..ever.

I don't believe that, especially for an Albertan. Your federal income taxes have been steadily reducing since the late 1990's and the GST was cut by 2%, with no increase at the provincial level until just recently.