|
Author |
Topic Options
|
Posts: 33691
Posted: Tue Sep 29, 2015 1:17 pm
xerxes xerxes: $1: Atif is well-dressed and speaks perfect English. He used to be a transport manager at Karachi airport and is from a well-to-do family. Between mouthfuls of curry, he adds: ‘But there is violence between political gangs in Karachi. Lots of people are leaving for Europe. These are the kinds of people you want to immigrate; young, working professionals Since Pakistan doesn't qualify, he isn't a refugee or asylum seeker or anything like that. It's a shame your comprehension is so poor you can't even understand that, but you have correctly identified one of the 80% of illegals who shouldn't be there anyway. He will be refused, and maybe deported, although the EU is really bad for it. But he gets a free ride for a while anyway. There are ways for young working professionals to immigrate perfectly legally. So, there must be something in his file that prevents him from doing it the legal way. Certain affiliations in certain groups, perhaps ?
|
Posts: 11362
Posted: Tue Sep 29, 2015 2:25 pm
N_Fiddledog N_Fiddledog: As long as we're doing 'my guy is smarter than your guy', here's something I bet you didn't know.
Condell is a Liberal. He's one of those liberals who was going merrily along and all of sudden noticed an influence foreign to his movement had moved in and were pretending to be them. They had now all but hijacked liberalism and were going down a path liberals had never charted.
So he stopped and said 'Wait a minute'. Who are these guys?'
That's when he learned about Progressives.
You're starting to see this more and more amongst Liberals and Libertarians.
Oliver is what I call a Prog pod. Whether he knows he's a Prog or he's just a one time Liberal who wasn't watching and his brain got hijacked, he is now preaching the Progressive Agenda.
Think I'm joking about Liberals starting to revolt against the Progressive hijacking of their movement? Well maybe a small winkie is called for, but not really.
In fact I could show you liberals all day who are rebelling or have rebelled, but seeing as Martin mentions the Prog trick of always going immediately to "all muslims" the minute anybody doesn't like anything any group of Mohammedans do...
Basically there's this popular group of YouTube Prog hijackers of Liberalism who like to preach to you how white people suck and anytime Islam is driving up the rape statistics or crucifying Christians, or whatever, it's because "not all muslims", or "a Christian or a Jew might have done something vaguely like it last week or thirty to thousands of years ago".
So here's one of the new movement of rebel liberals going after the progs of "the Young Turks" on their meme of 'Not all Muslims'
Pretty sure Roo isn't a Liberal. He is somewhat of a Racist though.
|
Posts: 9445
Posted: Tue Sep 29, 2015 2:56 pm
The last time Germany was this fucked it enabled Hitler's rise to power. 
|
Posted: Tue Sep 29, 2015 5:24 pm
sandorski sandorski:
Pretty sure Roo isn't a Liberal. He is somewhat of a Racist though.
I'm absolutely positive he says he is a Liberal and I've heard his explanation of why he's not a racist and why those who call him one are idiots. He's the one that makes the most sense to me.
|
Posted: Tue Sep 29, 2015 5:41 pm
You know Sandy, I think the problem might be you don't know what Liberalism is supposed to be and how that differs from the thing calling itself Progressive now. Here's the liberal left represented by Carl Benjamin also know as Sargon of Akkad explaining it to you. Although there are Progs who will scream at you about how classic liberals like the philosophers of the movement, or historical liberals like Thomas Jefferson liked a little collectivism every now and again argue with Sargon is what I say.
|
Posts: 11362
Posted: Tue Sep 29, 2015 6:40 pm
N_Fiddledog N_Fiddledog: sandorski sandorski:
Pretty sure Roo isn't a Liberal. He is somewhat of a Racist though.
I'm absolutely positive he says he is a Liberal and I've heard his explanation of why he's not a racist and why those who call him one are idiots. He's the one that makes the most sense to me.Of course, I never doubted that. Every Racist has an explanation as to why they are not Racist. Roo's attempt is just pathetic.
|
Posts: 21611
Posted: Tue Sep 29, 2015 8:43 pm
Last edited by Public_Domain on Mon Feb 24, 2025 9:58 am, edited 1 time in total.
|
Posted: Tue Sep 29, 2015 9:47 pm
sandorski sandorski: Of course, I never doubted that.
Every Racist has an explanation as to why they are not Racist. Roo's attempt is just pathetic. Race-baiting regressives call "Racist" when they can't win the argument based on the facts. The R word is all they got. I think that's his explanation." And he would find your predictable response comical.
|
Posts: 11362
Posted: Tue Sep 29, 2015 11:00 pm
N_Fiddledog N_Fiddledog: sandorski sandorski: Of course, I never doubted that.
Every Racist has an explanation as to why they are not Racist. Roo's attempt is just pathetic. Race-baiting regressives call "Racist" when they can't win the argument based on the facts. The R word is all they got. I think that's his explanation." And he would find your predictable response comical. Nah, he does all the race baiting himself. I don't respect the guy, so I don't care what he may think of me.
|
Posted: Tue Sep 29, 2015 11:12 pm
And I'm sure he's losing sleep at night, worried what you think of him. Oh wait, he doesn't know you. Because you're nobody. Just another snarky regressive out there somewhere in the darker realms of cyber space, spitting out recycled one liners, looking to get the race argument going.
Atheism-is-Unstoppable, or if you prefer - "Roo's" schtick is he's an atheist and he doesn't approve of the harm religions do.
Race only comes into it when the racist race baiters come at him for being white and not willing to check his white privilege and come kiss ass at the alter of the progressive agenda where any unbeliever is a "racist" if he calls attention to the negatives of the Prog-protected ideology of Islamo-fascism.
The Regressive race-baiters want to make race the issue, and it's not.
|
Posts: 11362
Posted: Wed Sep 30, 2015 2:16 am
N_Fiddledog N_Fiddledog: And I'm sure he's losing sleep at night, worried what you think of him. Oh wait, he doesn't know you. Because you're nobody. Just another snarky regressive out there somewhere in the darker realms of cyber space, spitting out recycled one liners, looking to get the race argument going.
Atheism-is-Unstoppable, or if you prefer - "Roo's" schtick is he's an atheist and he doesn't approve of the harm religions do.
Race only comes into it when the racist race baiters come at him for being white and not willing to check his white privilege and come kiss ass at the alter of the progressive agenda where any unbeliever is a "racist" if he calls attention to the negatives of the Prog-protected ideology of Islamo-fascism.
The Regressive race-baiters want to make race the issue, and it's not. He made it an issue all by himself. Sorry.
|
Posted: Wed Sep 30, 2015 9:38 am
sandorski sandorski: He made it an issue all by himself. Sorry.
Apologize all you want. You're still wrong. The big issue amongst New Atheists before this was whether or not it was possible to be Agnostic. The progressive arm of the online movement wanted to talk crap like Dylan Roof and Black Lives Matter, or ISIS. New Atheists were commanded to march in goose step out of guilt over white privilege to bullshit arguments like false equivalency ignoring all factual evidence that might contradict people like Puddin Face (I forget his actual name) or the Young Turks. At that point some New Atheists like Devon Tracy (The Atheist Roo) turned and said "Wait a minute. Who are these guys? And what is this Progressivism bullshit anyway?" This was happening in other New Media movements across the internet. You could see it with people like Liberal Pat Condell reacting against Muslim Apologism, Liberal Sargon of Akkad reacting against the attempted Prog takeover of gaming culture, or liberal Karen Straughan, and Libertarian Lauren Southern reacting against New Wave Feminist authoritarianism. Liberals and Libertarians like that aren't attacking. They're counter-attacking.
|
Posts: 11362
Posted: Wed Sep 30, 2015 11:59 am
N_Fiddledog N_Fiddledog: sandorski sandorski: He made it an issue all by himself. Sorry.
Apologize all you want. You're still wrong. The big issue amongst New Atheists before this was whether or not it was possible to be Agnostic. The progressive arm of the online movement wanted to talk crap like Dylan Roof and Black Lives Matter, or ISIS. New Atheists were commanded to march in goose step out of guilt over white privilege to bullshit arguments like false equivalency ignoring all factual evidence that might contradict people like Puddin Face (I forget his actual name) or the Young Turks. At that point some New Atheists like Devon Tracy (The Atheist Roo) turned and said "Wait a minute. Who are these guys? And what is this Progressivism bullshit anyway?" This was happening in other New Media movements across the internet. You could see it with people like Liberal Pat Condell reacting against Muslim Apologism, Liberal Sargon of Akkad reacting against the attempted Prog takeover of gaming culture, or liberal Karen Straughan, and Libertarian Lauren Southern reacting against New Wave Feminist authoritarianism. Liberals and Libertarians like that aren't attacking. They're counter-attacking. ....and?
|
Posted: Wed Sep 30, 2015 12:52 pm
And as usual, and always, you're wrong. He did not, as you say, "create the issue" of how he was supposed to bend a knee to the Regressive overlords out of white guilt. He called bullshit, just as other liberals and libertarians are starting to do in reaction to the bullshit of "Regressives".
|
Posted: Wed Sep 30, 2015 12:59 pm
I'm more interested to know why exactly you think these YouTube champions or podcast crusaders you link to all the time mean anything to anyone but you.
|
|
Page 2 of 4
|
[ 48 posts ] |
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests |
|
|