[CanadianODST]

lol

[Guy_Fawkes]

A troll is the last thing we need in this thread.

[CanadianODST]

Its seem to be getting in to a slam-fest.

[Gunnair]

CanadianODST CanadianODST:

Its seem to be getting in to a slam-fest.

This is a relatively polite one if it is.

[CanadianODST]

Gunnair Gunnair:

CanadianODST CanadianODST:

Its seem to be getting in to a slam-fest.

This is a relatively polite one if it is.

Didn't someone just call you a prick? Lol

[Gunnair]

CanadianODST CanadianODST:

Gunnair Gunnair:

CanadianODST CanadianODST:

Its seem to be getting in to a slam-fest.

This is a relatively polite one if it is.

Didn't someone just call you a prick? Lol

Oh yes, but that's still quite polite. I've been called much worse by much better.

[CanadianODST]

[/quote]

This is a relatively polite one if it is.[/quote]
Didn't someone just call you a prick? Lol[/quote]

Oh yes, but that's still quite polite. I've been called much worse by much better. [/quote]

Lol alright i'll leave you to it

[Lemmy]

Gunnair Gunnair:

EyeBrock EyeBrock:

Gunny, I think some of the non-religious have valid points as do you Christians. Two sides to this one mate.

Agreed, two sides to it.

There's two sides and there aren't. When it comes to the theist-atheist question, yes, there are two sides, neither are able to prove their point. To debate the existence of a supreme being, creator, whatever, can be a stimulating exercise, but both positions must enter such a debate admitting the possibility that they're wrong. It's not provable.

But if we're talking about organized religion then no, there are not two sides. There is not a human-conceived religion that correctly explains creation. And if you chose to bring human-constructed fairy tales to scientific discussions, you deserve whatever shit you take. There aren't two sides to the age of the earth. There aren't two sides to the process of evolution.

If theists want the atheists to stand down, all they have to say is "You don't know how things are, do you?" Then the atheist will say, "No, I don't". Then we can all agree to disagree and move on. But if the theist wants to bring up the "Yeah, but the bible says" argument, then they deserve whatever dose of reality they don't want to hear.

[Gunnair]

Lemmy Lemmy:

Gunnair Gunnair:

EyeBrock EyeBrock:

Gunny, I think some of the non-religious have valid points as do you Christians. Two sides to this one mate.

Agreed, two sides to it.

There's two sides and there aren't. When it comes to the theist-atheist question, yes, there are two sides, neither are able to prove their point. To debate the existence of a supreme being, creator, whatever, can be a stimulating exercise, but both positions must enter such a debate admitting the possibility that they're wrong. It's not provable.

But if we're talking about organized religion then no, there are not two sides. There is not a human-conceived religion that correctly explains creation. And if you chose to bring human-constructed fairy tales to scientific discussions, you deserve whatever shit you take. There aren't two sides to the age of the earth. There aren't two sides to the process of evolution.

If theists want the atheists to stand down, all they have to say is "You don't know how things are, do you?" Then the atheist will say, "No, I don't". Then we can all agree to disagree and move on. But if the theist wants to bring up the "Yeah, but the bible says" argument, then they deserve whatever dose of reality they don't want to hear.

What a shock you'd roll in looking for round two. Start tossing the shit then and see where it takes us.

[Lemmy]

You've been kind-of a grumpy sonofabitch all around lately, dude. Others have pointed out to you, as I will now, that no one other than you is looking for a fight. You're projecting. I'm not sure what criticism of your belief has touched such a nerve and, frankly, I don't care. There's still middle ground here. It comes from admitting we can't know what's unknowable.

[Gunnair]

Lemmy Lemmy:

You've been kind-of a grumpy sonofabitch all around lately, dude. Others have pointed out to you, as I will now, that no one other than you is looking for a fight. You're projecting. I'm not sure what criticism of your belief has touched such a nerve and, frankly, I don't care. There's still middle ground here. It comes from admitting we can't know what's unknowable.

$1:

And if you chose to bring human-constructed fairy tales to scientific discussions, you deserve whatever shit you take.

Funny thing is, it's guys like you who have chosen to bring scientific discussions and ridicule unwanted onto human-constructed fairy tales.

Fact is, you've been an insufferable asshole in these and other conversations because you feel you're somehow entitled to ridicule anyone's beliefs, even those unpresented, based on the sole reason that they bother you. I'm not sure what has touched your nerve and I also don't give a shit.

Ridicule and be ridiculed.

[Lemmy]

Call it as you will. If you say stupid shit, I'm going to call you on it. You've been sayin' a lot of stupid shit lately. If that makes me an asshole, okay, I'm an asshole.

[Gunnair]

Lemmy Lemmy:

Call it as you will. If you say stupid shit, I'm going to call you on it. If that makes me an asshole, okay, I'm an asshole.

Aye, call it as you will. If you're going to play insufferable asshole, then you'll be called on it. Reach for the kleenex if your feelings are hurt.

[Lemmy]

You're the only one crying.

[Tricks]

Still pretty tame.