CKA Forums
Login 
canadian forums
bottom
 
 
Canadian Forums

Author Topic Options
Offline
Forum Elite
Forum Elite
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 1905
PostPosted: Sat Sep 25, 2010 5:59 am
 


Well If you didn't know already according to Maclean Québec is the most Corrupt Province in Canada.

And for that I would d'like to thanks all the Québec Fédéralist who voted for such asshole As Jean Chrétien, Tony tomasso, Julie Boulet, Jacques Dupuis, Sam Hamad, Gérald Tremblay, And of course Jean Charest. (I probably forgot a few, well more than few, in fact the list go on and on...)

And a special thank to the English community in Montreal who will vote in the most corrupt and inept politician just because he is a Liberal.

To all of you Québec fédéralist Thank you Very much.


Offline
CKA Super Elite
CKA Super Elite
 Montreal Canadiens
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 7580
PostPosted: Sat Sep 25, 2010 6:48 am
 


How old are you Elvis..? corruption is nothing new from the feds to various provincial governments over time. Do you remember Maurice Le Noblet Duplessis ? I do. And there was nothing federalist about him. Nice try though to blame the fédéralists. There has been corruption in politics from time memorial. And don't forget the RC church in Québec. The PQ have been guilty of the same shit. And if you would like more of it, elect Pauline la Reine du Québec and see what happens


Offline
Forum Elite
Forum Elite
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 1905
PostPosted: Sat Sep 25, 2010 7:08 am
 


I'm old enough to remember the 80's and the 90's very well. Duplessis that was Before the quiet révolution.

And No the PQ has never ever been guilty of the same shit!!!

When they where in Power the pequist dealt whit corruption quickly 1 week later and the guy was out of the caucus. The PQ never dealt in influence peddling like the PLQ or the PLC for that matter.

Sorry but nobody who really follow Québec politics can honestly say that the PQ and the PLQ are the same. Thats just bullshit.

In the last 30 years Every major scandal came from corrupt Québec federalist ! And that is your burden. The Federalist in Québec (french part of Québec) are burn.


Offline
Forum Elite
Forum Elite
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 1905
PostPosted: Sat Sep 25, 2010 8:12 am
 


Voici un commentaire que quelqu'un à écris sur le blogue de Martineau. Il reflète bien (et c'est mieux écris) ma pensez d'aujourd'hui. Bonne lecture les Fédés. :twisted:

$1:
Attention: sur cette UNE dévastatrice de Maclean's, il manque un élément fondamental ( une omission probablement volontaire, considérant la provenance ...)
Sur la valise plein de piastres, IL MANQUE UN GROS ‘’STICKER’’: I LOVE CANADA !

Car depuis le début des révélations de toute cette merde, soit depuis la commission sur le scandaleux programme des commandites, rare sont les noms qui ne sont pas clairement ''du même bord'' dans le débat sur l'avenir du Québec en tant que ‘’société distincte’’.

Et la fameux titre de ''Palerme du Nord'' ne vient-ils pas grâce à une communauté qui a toujours combattu farouchement au coté du ROC contre toutes aspirations nationalistes des québécois (d'où sont parti les émeutes contre la toute première loi sur la langue, le fameux bill 22 pourtant créé par les libéraux de Robert Bourassa ? ) ???

McClean dit que les québécois sont probablement si obnibulés par le débat national qu'ils en ont oublié la bonne gouvernance. Je crois que McClean n'a pas tort, mais ils se trompent - volontairement - de cible !

Cette analyse colle d'abord au clan fédéraliste, autant du ROC que du Québec. Ils est pour eux si important de tenir les rangs serrés, au nom de la lutte contre les méchants souverainistes, que la plupart des dérapages sont ignorés, quand ce n'est pas carrément excusés, en autant qu'ils servent la cause.

L'ignoble programme des commandites, un programme ‘canadian’ -faut-il le rappeler - en a été une belle preuve. La réélection de l'administration Tremblay par les quartiers ouest de Montréal, malgré les puisssantes odeurs de corruption connues avant le scrutin, en est une autre !

Avec la Loi sur le financement des parties politiques, le Québec a fait de gros pas en avant pour se détacher de la triste époque du Duplessisme. Cette Loi est d’ailleurs encore une des meilleures d’Amérique du Nord pour limiter l’influence indue de l’argent et, OUI, elle est due pour être améliorée.

Mais l’apathie des citoyens face à la politique en général, et en particulier face aux agissements du ROC pour remettre le Québec à sa place depuis le dernier référendum, est en train de nous faire reculer à vitesse grand V ( à noter quand même que ce qui est dénoncé au Québec serait tout à fait légal à Washington, et considéré comme de la bien petite bière en termes de traffic d’influence).

Une chose est certaine, les éditeurs de McCleans ont du salivé de plaisir à préparer cet article !

Tout comme vont le faire leurs lecteurs ‘’canadians’’ en le lisant ...


Offline
Forum Elite
Forum Elite
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 1331
PostPosted: Sat Sep 25, 2010 9:52 am
 


Elvis Elvis:
Well If you didn't know already according to Maclean Québec is the most Corrupt Province in Canada.

And for that I would d'like to thanks all the Québec Fédéralist .


It has nothing to do with Fédéralist it has to do with all the government programs Quebec has. The larger the government the more corruption. You want to get ride of the corruption just reduce the size of your government.

That problem solved whats next, lol.


Offline
Forum Elite
Forum Elite
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 1905
PostPosted: Sat Sep 25, 2010 10:20 am
 


$1:
It has nothing to do with Fédéralist it has to do with all the government programs Quebec has. The larger the government the more corruption. You want to get ride of the corruption just reduce the size of your government.

That problem solved whats next, lol.


Bullshit !!

in 2002 we didn't have a government who was selling it's influence to the highest bidder. for crist sake the PLQ is doing influence peddling with daycare place!!!! How low can you go!

And BTW the smaller the state the more you have to subcontract therefor more opportunity for corruption. (M*r*n)


Offline
Forum Elite
Forum Elite
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 1331
PostPosted: Sat Sep 25, 2010 11:07 am
 


Elvis Elvis:

in 2002 we didn't have a government who was selling it's influence to the highest bidder. for crist sake the PLQ is doing influence peddling with daycare place!!!! How low can you go!

And BTW the smaller the state the more you have to subcontract therefor more opportunity for corruption. (M*r*n)


No, the smaller the state means you would not need to subcontract out because those servers would not be provided by the government they would be only provided by the private sector were they should be. The government real only has 5 to 10 jobs at the most. Cut the governments budge by 90% and then see how much corruption you have. Large government= corruption, very very small government= next to no corruption.

Plus, if the government only did a few things than there would be no "influence" to sell.

As for your little nationalism tiff, I would found it very hard to believe that one party is that much least corrupt than another. All parties are pretty much the same. Steal from their people and they offer us "free serves" we pay for.


Offline
Forum Elite
Forum Elite
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 1905
PostPosted: Sat Sep 25, 2010 11:22 am
 


$1:
I would found it very hard to believe that one party is that much least corrupt than another.


Believe what you want it is a fact!


Offline
CKA Super Elite
CKA Super Elite
 Montreal Canadiens


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 6584
PostPosted: Sat Sep 25, 2010 11:26 am
 


Sapio Sapio:
Elvis Elvis:
Well If you didn't know already according to Maclean Québec is the most Corrupt Province in Canada.

And for that I would d'like to thanks all the Québec Fédéralist .


It has nothing to do with Fédéralist it has to do with all the government programs Quebec has. The larger the government the more corruption. You want to get ride of the corruption just reduce the size of your government.

That problem solved whats next, lol.


Right on ! R=UP

With power comes corruption. We didn't have any corruption in the childcare system when it was not in the government hands.


Offline
CKA Super Elite
CKA Super Elite
 Montreal Canadiens


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 6584
PostPosted: Sat Sep 25, 2010 11:31 am
 


I guess when you are talking about Quebec federalists, you are talking also about the FTQ ?


Offline
Forum Elite
Forum Elite
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 1905
PostPosted: Sat Sep 25, 2010 11:34 am
 


Procu you are now a certified moron!

According to your logic Every time someone has power he become automatically corrupt.

Corruption come from dishonest people in place of power you moron.

And yes we didn't have corruption in the childcare system in 2002 and yes it was in the government hand. You fédéralist are just pathétique.

Like I said before "Thank you for voting in such corrupt politician for the last 30 years"


Offline
Forum Elite
Forum Elite
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 1905
PostPosted: Sat Sep 25, 2010 11:35 am
 


The FTQ are in a league of there OWN :D


Offline
CKA Super Elite
CKA Super Elite
 Montreal Canadiens


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 6584
PostPosted: Sat Sep 25, 2010 11:44 am
 


Elvis Elvis:
Procu you are now a certified moron!

According to your logic Every time someone has power he become automatically corrupt.

Corruption come from dishonest people in place of power you moron.

And yes we didn't have corruption in the childcare system in 2002 and yes it was in the government hand. You fédéralist are just pathétique.

Like I said before "Thank you for voting in such corrupt politician for the last 30 years"


Aaah des insultes... Ca ca toute une argumentation ;-) Ca vous aide vraiment !

There's nothing new in the equation more government = more corruption. How can there be government corruption in places it doesn't control ? That's logical. Nothing "moronic" in that.

Btw, I never voted PLQ.


Offline
Forum Elite
Forum Elite
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 1905
PostPosted: Sat Sep 25, 2010 11:53 am
 


Scusez mais je suis en tabarnak Et ton raisonnement est boiteux au boutte. et malheureusement pour toi j'ai argumenter mon point

check ça

Ton argument

With power comes corruption. We didn't have any corruption in the childcare system when it was not in the government hands.

Deux prémisse:

1: si tu as du pouvoir t'es corrompu
2: On avait pas de corruption quand le gouvernement ne s'occupait pas des garderie.

Ma réplique qui démoli ton raisonnement simpliste

1:According to your logic Every time someone has power he become automatically corrupt.

Corruption come from dishonest people in place of power. not from power itself.


2:And yes we didn't have corruption in the childcare system in 2002 and yes it was in the government hand.

En conclusion: Lis un peu ça fait dure ton affaire.


Offline
Forum Elite
Forum Elite
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 1331
PostPosted: Sat Sep 25, 2010 12:49 pm
 


Elvis Elvis:
Corruption come from dishonest people in place of power you moron.


Then is this not any reason to limit the power that people have access to in government. Limit the governments power limit the changes for corruption


Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 42 posts ]  1  2  3  Next



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest




 
     
All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © Canadaka.net. Powered by © phpBB.