CKA Forums
Login 
canadian forums
bottom
 
 
Canadian Forums

Author Topic Options
Offline
CKA Moderator
CKA Moderator
 Vancouver Canucks


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 65472
PostPosted: Tue May 04, 2010 7:36 pm
 


http://capoliticalnews.com/blog_post/show/5025

$1:
By Rosalind S. Helderman, Washington Post, 5/4/10

RICHMOND -- Virginia Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli II is demanding that the University of Virginia turn over a broad range of documents from a former professor to determine whether he defrauded taxpayers as he sought grants for global warming research.

The civil investigative demand asks for all data and materials presented by former professor Michael Mann when he applied for five research grants from the university. It also gives the school until May 27 to produce all correspondence or e-mails between Mann and 39 other scientists since 1999.

The actions by Cuccinelli (R) -- who has sued the federal government over its regulation of greenhouse gases and has become a leading national voice in alleging that scientists have skewed data to show evidence the Earth is warming -- were cheered by those on the right, who have long targeted Mann as a leading proponent of the theory.

Mann, who works at Penn State, was one of the authors of the "hockey stick" graph, a study that used a variety of data, including tree rings, to chart climate change. His research showed a rapid recent increase in the Earth's temperature.

Mann's work has been repeatedly targeted by global warming skeptics, particularly after an e-mail from him referring to a statistical "trick" he used in his research surfaced in a series of leaked e-mails from the University of East Anglia's Climatic Research Unit. Mann has said the e-mail was taken out of context, and an inquiry by Penn State concluded that there was no evidence Mann has engaged in efforts to falsify or suppress data.

Mann and several academic groups decried Cuccinelli's subpoena as an unprecedented inquisition that could threaten academic freedom.

"I think he's simply trying to smear me as part of a larger campaign to discredit my science," said Mann, who left the University of Virginia in 2005.

Rachel Levinson, senior counsel with the American Association of University Professors, said Cuccinelli's request had "echoes of McCarthyism."

"It would be incredibly chilling to anyone else practicing in either the same area or in any politically sensitive area," she said.

In an interview, Cuccinelli said the request is part of an "open inquiry" into whether there were "knowing inconsistencies" made by Mann as he sought taxpayer dollars to fund research.

"In light of the Climategate e-mails, there does seem to at least be an argument to be made that a course was undertaken by some of the individuals involved, including potentially Michael Mann, where they were steering a course to reach a conclusion," he said. "Our act, frankly, just requires honesty."

Carol Wood, a spokesman for the University of Virginia, confirmed that the school had received the April 23 request. She said that it will take time for the university to decide how to proceed but that "the university has a legal obligation to answer this request and it is our intention to respond to the extent required by law."

According to the document, the demand was issued under the Virginia Fraud Against Taxpayers Act, a 2002 law that gives the attorney general the right to demand documents and testimony in cases in which tax dollars have allegedly been obtained falsely by state employees. The document indicates that Cuccinelli is investigating possible violations of sections of the act forbidding employees from making false claims for payment, submitting false records for payment or conspiring to defraud the state.

If Cuccinelli were to successfully pursue a civil allegation against Mann, the professor could be forced to return research money or pay a civil fine.

"It's essentially a subpoena," said Steve Benjamin, a Richmond defense attorney who advises the General Assembly on legal issues. "It permits the issuance of that subpoena without the filing of any lawsuit and without the intervention or permission of any court."

Tim Donaghy, a scientific integrity analyst with the Union of Concerned Scientists, said that although Mann and other climate scientists have been called to defend their science before Congress and other bodies, he was not aware of a previous attorney general investigating their work as fraud. "It would be a disturbing precedent," he said.

But Mark R. Levin, president of the Landmark Legal Foundation, a leading group challenging climate change science, said Cuccinelli's inquiry is logical given his suit against the Environmental Protection Agency.

"There is no scientific consensus on global warming or Mann's influence on global warming, if indeed it is occurring," Levin said. "The federal government is relying on junk science. So it's perfectly reasonable the attorney general is raising these issues."

This is not the university's first brush with the political sensitivities of the climate change issue. In 2006, then-Gov. Timothy M. Kaine (D) asked that former Virginia state climatologist and university professor Patrick J. Michaels make clear that he was not speaking on behalf of the state when he publicly offered skepticism about global warming.

Michaels, who is a fellow at the Cato Institute, said: "There was a great deal of academic intolerance shown to me, and, because of that, I don't want to comment on this. That's not the way we should behave."


Offline
CKA Moderator
CKA Moderator
 Vancouver Canucks


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 65472
PostPosted: Tue May 04, 2010 7:37 pm
 


The BS about global warming may just have to have its day in court. This will be interesting to see if the AGW cultists can prove their beliefs in a court of law.


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 14747
PostPosted: Tue May 04, 2010 8:08 pm
 


This should prove interesting? Your right though Bart, it's the first challenge of the new religion in a public forum that could have a definative outcome.

I wait with bated breath for the acolytes to mass at the court house to try and disrupt the proceedings if there is even a chance that the outcome won't go their way.


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
Profile
Posts: 12349
PostPosted: Tue May 04, 2010 8:14 pm
 


BartSimpson BartSimpson:
The BS about global warming may just have to have its day in court. This will be interesting to see if the AGW cultists can prove their beliefs in a court of law.


Maybe. Sounds like the Scopes trial in a lot of ways, doesn't it?


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 19926
PostPosted: Tue May 04, 2010 9:06 pm
 


Sounds more like an AG with too much time on his hands trying to score some cheap political points.


Offline
CKA Moderator
CKA Moderator
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 53170
PostPosted: Tue May 04, 2010 11:31 pm
 


xerxes xerxes:
Sounds more like an AG with too much time on his hands trying to score some cheap political points.


Bingo.

http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/washing ... -seal.html


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 42160
PostPosted: Wed May 05, 2010 12:19 am
 


Nope. Sounds like an AG trying to determine if taxpayers were defrauded by a snakeoil salesman.


Offline
Forum Addict
Forum Addict
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 883
PostPosted: Wed May 05, 2010 2:15 am
 


I look forward to the true debate.


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Vancouver Canucks
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 11362
PostPosted: Wed May 05, 2010 10:06 am
 


A Politics and GW. Fail AG, Fail.


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Toronto Maple Leafs
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 14139
PostPosted: Wed May 05, 2010 11:09 am
 


ShepherdsDog ShepherdsDog:
Nope. Sounds like an AG trying to determine if taxpayers were defrauded by a snakeoil salesman.


Exactly. If it turns out that that the final evidence for AGW is wrong or even inconclusive, that's one thing. But if they can prove he was getting cash while fudging numbers to get that cash, he's screwed.


Offline
CKA Moderator
CKA Moderator
 Vancouver Canucks


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 65472
PostPosted: Wed May 05, 2010 11:20 am
 


PublicAnimalNo9 PublicAnimalNo9:
ShepherdsDog ShepherdsDog:
Nope. Sounds like an AG trying to determine if taxpayers were defrauded by a snakeoil salesman.


Exactly. If it turns out that that the final evidence for AGW is wrong or even inconclusive, that's one thing. But if they can prove he was getting cash while fudging numbers to get that cash, he's screwed.


Bingo! That's the point. If the guy is following the lead of the other folks in the AGW movement (Hansen, Suzuki, Gore, IPCC, etc.) and "adjusting" data to fit a preconceived notion and then applying for and receiving grants based on fraudulent data then he's committed fraud and should be prosecuted for it.

And he'll have his day in court to prove himself. I wonder, though, will Algore and Hansen and Suzuki come testify under oath to defend this guy or will they merely pose for the cameras outside the courtroom?


Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 11 posts ] 



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests




 
     
All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © Canadaka.net. Powered by © phpBB.