Xort Xort:
ShepherdsDog ShepherdsDog:
This is an actual informed opinion on the story from a friend of mine who spent 22 years as a military doctor, doing two rotations at KAF with ISAF:
$1:
Misleading and poorly researched story once again. The health of veterans fluctuate and illnesses progress. A regular health review with a physician ensures that services can be added or enhanced based on the most current. health assessment. It's not a matter of proving whether a vet still needs a wheelchair, but whether the current wheelchair is adequate based on changes in mobility, for example. The pervasive yellow journalism is getting old.
Go ask your friend that has 22 years not working in the VA what happens if you don't show up for your yearly 'review', or now tri-yearly review.
"A regular health review with a physician ensures that services can be added or enhanced based on the most current."
Or reduced and ended at the judgment of the VA employee, starting the fight for care all over again.
I actually think you're both right here.
To Shep's point, it's not uncommon for disability programs to require recurring medical visits, not just for the purpose of verifying if someone's still disabled but to assess their condition in the context of ever-evolving treatment options. For example, the legless veteran is wheelchair-bound presumably because currently there are no artificial legs that suitable to his condition....however prosthetic limb technology is developing rapidly and perhaps a future tri-annual review will identify him as an ideal candidate for a new set of robotic limbs that will allow him to walk again, and will greatly improve his quality of life and potential for gainful employment.
OTOH, from past controversies, the culture of VA seems to be cold and openly hostile to veterans as Xort mentions...lacking a system of due process and opening secret files on so-called "trouble maker" vets who just trying to improve things. So you can set up all kinds of 'best practice' policies with the best of intentions but if the people in charge of the day-to-day administration are predisposed to a certain viewpoint, at best it's a pointless endeavour.